(0) Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given
CpxTRS could be proven to be
BOUNDS(1, n^1).
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(g(x), s(0), y) → f(y, y, g(x))
g(s(x)) → s(g(x))
g(0) → 0
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
(1) DependencyGraphProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)
The following rules are not reachable from basic terms in the dependency graph and can be removed:
f(g(x), s(0), y) → f(y, y, g(x))
(2) Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given
CpxTRS could be proven to be
BOUNDS(1, n^1).
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(s(x)) → s(g(x))
g(0) → 0
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
(3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match Bound [MATCHBOUNDS1,MATCHBOUNDS2] of 1.
The certificate found is represented by the following graph.
Start state: 1
Accept states: [2]
Transitions:
1→2[g_1|0, 0|1]
1→3[s_1|1]
2→2[s_1|0, 0|0]
3→2[g_1|1, 0|1]
3→3[s_1|1]
(4) BOUNDS(1, n^1)