(0) Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given
CpxTRS could be proven to be
BOUNDS(1, n^1).
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(s(0), g(x)) → f(x, g(x))
g(s(x)) → g(x)
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
(1) DependencyGraphProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)
The following rules are not reachable from basic terms in the dependency graph and can be removed:
f(s(0), g(x)) → f(x, g(x))
(2) Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given
CpxTRS could be proven to be
BOUNDS(1, n^1).
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
g(s(x)) → g(x)
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
(3) CpxTrsMatchBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match Bound [MATCHBOUNDS1,MATCHBOUNDS2] of 1.
The certificate found is represented by the following graph.
Start state: 1
Accept states: [2]
Transitions:
1→2[g_1|0, g_1|1]
2→2[s_1|0]
(4) BOUNDS(1, n^1)