(0) Obligation:
The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given
CpxTRS could be proven to be
BOUNDS(1, n^1).
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
c(c(b(c(x)))) → b(a(0, c(x)))
c(c(x)) → b(c(b(c(x))))
a(0, x) → c(c(x))
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
(1) CpxTrsMatchBoundsTAProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
A linear upper bound on the runtime complexity of the TRS R could be shown with a Match-Bound[TAB_LEFTLINEAR,TAB_NONLEFTLINEAR] (for contructor-based start-terms) of 2.
The compatible tree automaton used to show the Match-Boundedness (for constructor-based start-terms) is represented by:
final states : [1, 2]
transitions:
b0(0) → 0
00() → 0
c0(0) → 1
a0(0, 0) → 2
c1(0) → 3
c1(3) → 2
c2(0) → 6
b2(6) → 5
c2(5) → 4
b2(4) → 2
(2) BOUNDS(1, n^1)