* Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
f(x,g(x)) -> x
f(x,h(y)) -> f(h(x),y)
- Signature:
{f/2} / {g/1,h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g,h}
+ Applied Processor:
Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
+ Details:
()
** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
f(x,g(x)) -> x
f(x,h(y)) -> f(h(x),y)
- Signature:
{f/2} / {g/1,h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g,h}
+ Applied Processor:
DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10}
+ Details:
The system has following decreasing Loops:
f(x,y){y -> h(y)} =
f(x,h(y)) ->^+ f(h(x),y)
= C[f(h(x),y) = f(x,y){x -> h(x)}]
** Step 1.b:1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
f(x,g(x)) -> x
f(x,h(y)) -> f(h(x),y)
- Signature:
{f/2} / {g/1,h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g,h}
+ Applied Processor:
Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
+ Details:
The problem is match-bounded by 1.
The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
f_0(2,2) -> 1
f_1(3,2) -> 1
g_0(2) -> 1
g_0(2) -> 2
h_0(2) -> 1
h_0(2) -> 2
h_1(2) -> 1
h_1(2) -> 3
h_1(3) -> 1
h_1(3) -> 3
2 -> 1
3 -> 1
** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Weak TRS:
f(x,g(x)) -> x
f(x,h(y)) -> f(h(x),y)
- Signature:
{f/2} / {g/1,h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f} and constructors {g,h}
+ Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
+ Details:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))