* Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
f(x,y) -> g(x,y)
g(h(x),y) -> h(f(x,y))
g(h(x),y) -> h(g(x,y))
- Signature:
{f/2,g/2} / {h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {h}
+ Applied Processor:
Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
+ Details:
()
** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
f(x,y) -> g(x,y)
g(h(x),y) -> h(f(x,y))
g(h(x),y) -> h(g(x,y))
- Signature:
{f/2,g/2} / {h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {h}
+ Applied Processor:
DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10}
+ Details:
The system has following decreasing Loops:
g(x,y){x -> h(x)} =
g(h(x),y) ->^+ h(g(x,y))
= C[g(x,y) = g(x,y){}]
** Step 1.b:1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
f(x,y) -> g(x,y)
g(h(x),y) -> h(f(x,y))
g(h(x),y) -> h(g(x,y))
- Signature:
{f/2,g/2} / {h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {h}
+ Applied Processor:
Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
+ Details:
The problem is match-bounded by 2.
The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
f_0(2,2) -> 1
f_1(2,2) -> 3
g_0(2,2) -> 1
g_1(2,2) -> 1
g_2(2,2) -> 3
h_0(2) -> 2
h_1(1) -> 1
h_1(1) -> 3
h_1(3) -> 1
h_1(3) -> 3
** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Weak TRS:
f(x,y) -> g(x,y)
g(h(x),y) -> h(f(x,y))
g(h(x),y) -> h(g(x,y))
- Signature:
{f/2,g/2} / {h/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {f,g} and constructors {h}
+ Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
+ Details:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))