* Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(b(x)) -> b(a(x)) a(c(x)) -> x - Signature: {a/1} / {b/1,c/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a} and constructors {b,c} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(b(x)) -> b(a(x)) a(c(x)) -> x - Signature: {a/1} / {b/1,c/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a} and constructors {b,c} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: a(x){x -> b(x)} = a(b(x)) ->^+ b(a(x)) = C[a(x) = a(x){}] ** Step 1.b:1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: a(b(x)) -> b(a(x)) a(c(x)) -> x - Signature: {a/1} / {b/1,c/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a} and constructors {b,c} + Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} + Details: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. a_0(2) -> 1 a_1(2) -> 3 b_0(2) -> 1 b_0(2) -> 2 b_0(2) -> 3 b_1(3) -> 1 b_1(3) -> 3 c_0(2) -> 1 c_0(2) -> 2 c_0(2) -> 3 2 -> 1 2 -> 3 ** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: a(b(x)) -> b(a(x)) a(c(x)) -> x - Signature: {a/1} / {b/1,c/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {a} and constructors {b,c} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))