* Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
+(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
+(f(x),+(f(y),z)) -> +(f(+(x,y)),z)
+(f(x),f(y)) -> f(+(x,y))
- Signature:
{+/2} / {f/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {f}
+ Applied Processor:
Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy}
+ Details:
()
** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?)
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
+(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
+(f(x),+(f(y),z)) -> +(f(+(x,y)),z)
+(f(x),f(y)) -> f(+(x,y))
- Signature:
{+/2} / {f/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {f}
+ Applied Processor:
DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10}
+ Details:
The system has following decreasing Loops:
+(x,y){x -> f(x),y -> f(y)} =
+(f(x),f(y)) ->^+ f(+(x,y))
= C[+(x,y) = +(x,y){}]
** Step 1.b:1: Bounds WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Strict TRS:
+(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
+(f(x),+(f(y),z)) -> +(f(+(x,y)),z)
+(f(x),f(y)) -> f(+(x,y))
- Signature:
{+/2} / {f/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {f}
+ Applied Processor:
Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match}
+ Details:
The problem is match-bounded by 1.
The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
+_0(2,2) -> 1
+_1(2,2) -> 3
f_0(2) -> 2
f_1(3) -> 1
f_1(3) -> 3
** Step 1.b:2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1))
+ Considered Problem:
- Weak TRS:
+(+(x,y),z) -> +(x,+(y,z))
+(f(x),+(f(y),z)) -> +(f(+(x,y)),z)
+(f(x),f(y)) -> f(+(x,y))
- Signature:
{+/2} / {f/1}
- Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {+} and constructors {f}
+ Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
+ Details:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).
WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^1))