* Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: plus(plus(X,Y),Z) -> plus(X,plus(Y,Z)) times(X,s(Y)) -> plus(X,times(Y,X)) - Signature: {plus/2,times/2} / {s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {plus,times} and constructors {s} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () * Step 2: MI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: plus(plus(X,Y),Z) -> plus(X,plus(Y,Z)) times(X,s(Y)) -> plus(X,times(Y,X)) - Signature: {plus/2,times/2} / {s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {plus,times} and constructors {s} + Applied Processor: MI {miKind = MaximalMatrix (UpperTriangular (Multiplicity Nothing)), miDimension = 1, miUArgs = UArgs, miURules = URules, miSelector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind MaximalMatrix (UpperTriangular (Multiplicity Nothing)): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(plus) = {2} Following symbols are considered usable: {plus,times} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(plus) = [1] x_2 + [0] p(s) = [1] x_1 + [4] p(times) = [1] x_1 + [1] x_2 + [0] Following rules are strictly oriented: times(X,s(Y)) = [1] X + [1] Y + [4] > [1] X + [1] Y + [0] = plus(X,times(Y,X)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: plus(plus(X,Y),Z) = [1] Z + [0] >= [1] Z + [0] = plus(X,plus(Y,Z)) * Step 3: MI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: plus(plus(X,Y),Z) -> plus(X,plus(Y,Z)) - Weak TRS: times(X,s(Y)) -> plus(X,times(Y,X)) - Signature: {plus/2,times/2} / {s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {plus,times} and constructors {s} + Applied Processor: MI {miKind = MaximalMatrix (UpperTriangular (Multiplicity (Just 1))), miDimension = 2, miUArgs = UArgs, miURules = URules, miSelector = Just any strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind MaximalMatrix (UpperTriangular (Multiplicity (Just 1))): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(plus) = {2} Following symbols are considered usable: {plus,times} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(plus) = [0 6] x_1 + [1 0] x_2 + [2] [0 1] [0 1] [2] p(s) = [1 2] x_1 + [2] [0 0] [1] p(times) = [14 9] x_1 + [14 2] x_2 + [0] [ 4 1] [ 4 0] [9] Following rules are strictly oriented: plus(plus(X,Y),Z) = [0 6] X + [0 6] Y + [1 0] Z + [14] [0 1] [0 1] [0 1] [4] > [0 6] X + [0 6] Y + [1 0] Z + [4] [0 1] [0 1] [0 1] [4] = plus(X,plus(Y,Z)) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: times(X,s(Y)) = [14 9] X + [14 28] Y + [30] [ 4 1] [ 4 8] [17] >= [14 8] X + [14 9] Y + [2] [ 4 1] [ 4 1] [11] = plus(X,times(Y,X)) * Step 4: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: plus(plus(X,Y),Z) -> plus(X,plus(Y,Z)) times(X,s(Y)) -> plus(X,times(Y,X)) - Signature: {plus/2,times/2} / {s/1} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {plus,times} and constructors {s} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1))