* Step 1: Sum WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) inssort(xs) -> isort(xs,Nil()) isort(Cons(x,xs),r) -> isort(xs,insert(x,r)) isort(Nil(),r) -> r - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<,insert,insert[Ite][False][Ite],inssort ,isort} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: Sum {left = someStrategy, right = someStrategy} + Details: () ** Step 1.a:1: DecreasingLoops WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),?) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) inssort(xs) -> isort(xs,Nil()) isort(Cons(x,xs),r) -> isort(xs,insert(x,r)) isort(Nil(),r) -> r - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<,insert,insert[Ite][False][Ite],inssort ,isort} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: DecreasingLoops {bound = AnyLoop, narrow = 10} + Details: The system has following decreasing Loops: isort(y,z){y -> Cons(x,y)} = isort(Cons(x,y),z) ->^+ isort(y,insert(x,z)) = C[isort(y,insert(x,z)) = isort(y,z){z -> insert(x,z)}] ** Step 1.b:1: DependencyPairs WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict TRS: insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) inssort(xs) -> isort(xs,Nil()) isort(Cons(x,xs),r) -> isort(xs,insert(x,r)) isort(Nil(),r) -> r - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<,insert,insert[Ite][False][Ite],inssort ,isort} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} + Details: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)) inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5() Weak DPs <#(x,0()) -> c_6() <#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7() <#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(True(),x,r) -> c_10() and mark the set of starting terms. ** Step 1.b:2: UsableRules WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)) inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5() - Weak DPs: <#(x,0()) -> c_6() <#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7() <#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(True(),x,r) -> c_10() - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) inssort(xs) -> isort(xs,Nil()) isort(Cons(x,xs),r) -> isort(xs,insert(x,r)) isort(Nil(),r) -> r - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: UsableRules + Details: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) <#(x,0()) -> c_6() <#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7() <#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)) insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(True(),x,r) -> c_10() inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5() ** Step 1.b:3: PredecessorEstimation WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)) inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5() - Weak DPs: <#(x,0()) -> c_6() <#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7() <#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(True(),x,r) -> c_10() - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimation {onSelection = all simple predecessor estimation selector} + Details: We estimate the number of application of {5} by application of Pre({5}) = {3,4}. Here rules are labelled as follows: 1: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() 2: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)) 3: inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) 4: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) 5: isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5() 6: <#(x,0()) -> c_6() 7: <#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7() 8: <#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)) 9: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) 10: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(True(),x,r) -> c_10() ** Step 1.b:4: RemoveWeakSuffixes WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)) inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak DPs: <#(x,0()) -> c_6() <#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7() <#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(True(),x,r) -> c_10() isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5() - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() 2:S:insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)) -->_1 insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)):8 -->_2 <#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)):7 -->_1 insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(True(),x,r) -> c_10():9 -->_2 <#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7():6 -->_2 <#(x,0()) -> c_6():5 3:S:inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):4 -->_1 isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5():10 4:S:isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) -->_1 isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5():10 -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):4 -->_2 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)):2 -->_2 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():1 5:W:<#(x,0()) -> c_6() 6:W:<#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7() 7:W:<#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)) -->_1 <#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)):7 -->_1 <#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7():6 -->_1 <#(x,0()) -> c_6():5 8:W:insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) -->_1 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)):2 -->_1 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():1 9:W:insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(True(),x,r) -> c_10() 10:W:isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5() The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 10: isort#(Nil(),r) -> c_5() 9: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(True(),x,r) -> c_10() 7: <#(S(x),S(y)) -> c_8(<#(x,y)) 5: <#(x,0()) -> c_6() 6: <#(0(),S(y)) -> c_7() ** Step 1.b:5: SimplifyRHS WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)) inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak DPs: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/2,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: SimplifyRHS + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() 2:S:insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)) -->_1 insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)):8 3:S:inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):4 4:S:isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):4 -->_2 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)):2 -->_2 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():1 8:W:insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) -->_1 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)),<#(x',x)):2 -->_1 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():1 Due to missing edges in the depndency graph, the right-hand sides of following rules could be simplified: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) ** Step 1.b:6: RemoveHeads WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak DPs: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: RemoveHeads + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() 2:S:insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) -->_1 insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)):5 3:S:inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())) -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):4 4:S:isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):4 -->_2 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):2 -->_2 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():1 5:W:insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) -->_1 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):2 -->_1 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():1 Following roots of the dependency graph are removed, as the considered set of starting terms is closed under reduction with respect to these rules (modulo compound contexts). [(3,inssort#(xs) -> c_3(isort#(xs,Nil())))] ** Step 1.b:7: Decompose WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak DPs: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: Decompose {onSelection = all cycle independent sub-graph, withBound = RelativeAdd} + Details: We analyse the complexity of following sub-problems (R) and (S). Problem (S) is obtained from the input problem by shifting strict rules from (R) into the weak component. Problem (R) - Strict DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() - Weak DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0 ,c_8/1,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} Problem (S) - Strict DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0 ,c_8/1,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} *** Step 1.b:7.a:1: PredecessorEstimationCP WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() - Weak DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimationCP {onSelectionCP = any intersect of rules of CDG leaf and strict-rules, withComplexityPair = NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing}} + Details: We first use the processor NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} to orient following rules strictly: 1: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() The strictly oriented rules are moved into the weak component. **** Step 1.b:7.a:1.a:1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() - Weak DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just first alternative for predecessorEstimation on any intersect of rules of CDG leaf and strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation: The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(c_2) = {1}, uargs(c_4) = {1,2}, uargs(c_9) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {<,<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort#,isort#} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = [0] p(<) = [1] p(Cons) = [1] x2 + [2] p(False) = [1] p(Nil) = [0] p(S) = [4] p(True) = [0] p(insert) = [0] p(insert[Ite][False][Ite]) = [2] x2 + [10] p(inssort) = [2] x1 + [1] p(isort) = [4] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] p(<#) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1] p(insert#) = [2] p(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#) = [2] x1 + [0] p(inssort#) = [1] p(isort#) = [9] x1 + [1] p(c_1) = [0] p(c_2) = [1] x1 + [0] p(c_3) = [1] x1 + [8] p(c_4) = [1] x1 + [8] x2 + [2] p(c_5) = [2] p(c_6) = [4] p(c_7) = [1] p(c_8) = [1] x1 + [0] p(c_9) = [1] x1 + [0] p(c_10) = [1] Following rules are strictly oriented: insert#(x,Nil()) = [2] > [0] = c_1() Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) = [2] >= [2] = c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) = [2] >= [2] = c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) = [9] xs + [19] >= [9] xs + [19] = c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) <(x,0()) = [1] >= [1] = False() <(0(),S(y)) = [1] >= [0] = True() <(S(x),S(y)) = [1] >= [1] = <(x,y) **** Step 1.b:7.a:1.a:2: Assumption WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: Assumption {assumed = Certificate {spaceUB = Unknown, spaceLB = Unknown, timeUB = Poly (Just 0), timeLB = Unknown}} + Details: () **** Step 1.b:7.a:1.b:1: RemoveWeakSuffixes WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:W:insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() 2:W:insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) -->_1 insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)):3 3:W:insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) -->_1 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):2 -->_1 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():1 4:W:isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):4 -->_2 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):2 -->_2 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():1 The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 4: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) 2: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) 3: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) 1: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() **** Step 1.b:7.a:1.b:2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). *** Step 1.b:7.b:1: RemoveWeakSuffixes WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak DPs: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) -->_1 insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)):4 2:S:isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) -->_2 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():3 -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):2 -->_2 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):1 3:W:insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() 4:W:insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) -->_1 insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1():3 -->_1 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):1 The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 3: insert#(x,Nil()) -> c_1() *** Step 1.b:7.b:2: Decompose WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak DPs: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: Decompose {onSelection = all cycle independent sub-graph, withBound = RelativeAdd} + Details: We analyse the complexity of following sub-problems (R) and (S). Problem (S) is obtained from the input problem by shifting strict rules from (R) into the weak component. Problem (R) - Strict DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) - Weak DPs: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0 ,c_8/1,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} Problem (S) - Strict DPs: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0 ,c_8/1,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} **** Step 1.b:7.b:2.a:1: PredecessorEstimationCP WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) - Weak DPs: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimationCP {onSelectionCP = any intersect of rules of CDG leaf and strict-rules, withComplexityPair = NaturalPI {shape = Mixed 2, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing}} + Details: We first use the processor NaturalPI {shape = Mixed 2, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} to orient following rules strictly: 1: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) Consider the set of all dependency pairs 1: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) 2: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) 4: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) Processor NaturalPI {shape = Mixed 2, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing}induces the complexity certificateTIME (?,O(n^2)) SPACE(?,?)on application of the dependency pairs {1} These cover all (indirect) predecessors of dependency pairs {1,4} their number of applications is equally bounded. The dependency pairs are shifted into the weak component. ***** Step 1.b:7.b:2.a:1.a:1: NaturalPI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^2)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) - Weak DPs: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: NaturalPI {shape = Mixed 2, restrict = Restrict, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just first alternative for predecessorEstimation on any intersect of rules of CDG leaf and strict-rules} + Details: We apply a polynomial interpretation of kind constructor-based(mixed(2)): The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(c_2) = {1}, uargs(c_4) = {1,2}, uargs(c_9) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {insert,insert[Ite][False][Ite],<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort#,isort#} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = 0 p(<) = 0 p(Cons) = 1 + x2 p(False) = 0 p(Nil) = 0 p(S) = 0 p(True) = 1 p(insert) = 1 + x2 p(insert[Ite][False][Ite]) = 1 + x3 p(inssort) = x1 p(isort) = x2 p(<#) = 2*x2 p(insert#) = 1 + 2*x2 p(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#) = 2*x3 p(inssort#) = 0 p(isort#) = 2 + 2*x1 + 3*x1*x2 + 2*x1^2 p(c_1) = 1 p(c_2) = x1 p(c_3) = 0 p(c_4) = 1 + x1 + x2 p(c_5) = 0 p(c_6) = 1 p(c_7) = 1 p(c_8) = 0 p(c_9) = x1 p(c_10) = 0 Following rules are strictly oriented: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) = 3 + 2*xs > 2 + 2*xs = c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) = 2 + 2*xs >= 1 + 2*xs = c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) = 6 + 3*r + 3*r*xs + 6*xs + 2*xs^2 >= 4 + 2*r + 3*r*xs + 5*xs + 2*xs^2 = c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) insert(x,Nil()) = 1 >= 1 = Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) = 2 + xs >= 2 + xs = insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) = 2 + xs >= 2 + xs = Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) = 1 + r >= 1 + r = Cons(x,r) ***** Step 1.b:7.b:2.a:1.a:2: Assumption WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: Assumption {assumed = Certificate {spaceUB = Unknown, spaceLB = Unknown, timeUB = Poly (Just 0), timeLB = Unknown}} + Details: () ***** Step 1.b:7.b:2.a:1.b:1: RemoveWeakSuffixes WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:W:insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) -->_1 insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)):2 2:W:insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) -->_1 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):1 3:W:isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):3 -->_2 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):1 The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 3: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) 1: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) 2: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) ***** Step 1.b:7.b:2.a:1.b:2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). **** Step 1.b:7.b:2.b:1: RemoveWeakSuffixes WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak DPs: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) -->_2 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):2 -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):1 2:W:insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) -->_1 insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)):3 3:W:insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) -->_1 insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))):2 The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 2: insert#(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_2(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs))) 3: insert[Ite][False][Ite]#(False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> c_9(insert#(x',xs)) **** Step 1.b:7.b:2.b:2: SimplifyRHS WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/2,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: SimplifyRHS + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)) -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r)),insert#(x,r)):1 Due to missing edges in the depndency graph, the right-hand sides of following rules could be simplified: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))) **** Step 1.b:7.b:2.b:3: PredecessorEstimationCP WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/1,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: PredecessorEstimationCP {onSelectionCP = any intersect of rules of CDG leaf and strict-rules, withComplexityPair = NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing}} + Details: We first use the processor NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Nothing} to orient following rules strictly: 1: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))) The strictly oriented rules are moved into the weak component. ***** Step 1.b:7.b:2.b:3.a:1: NaturalMI WORST_CASE(?,O(n^1)) + Considered Problem: - Strict DPs: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/1,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: NaturalMI {miDimension = 1, miDegree = 1, miKind = Algebraic, uargs = UArgs, urules = URules, selector = Just first alternative for predecessorEstimation on any intersect of rules of CDG leaf and strict-rules} + Details: We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation: The following argument positions are considered usable: uargs(c_4) = {1} Following symbols are considered usable: {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort#,isort#} TcT has computed the following interpretation: p(0) = [3] p(<) = [5] x1 + [7] x2 + [0] p(Cons) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [4] p(False) = [1] p(Nil) = [10] p(S) = [1] p(True) = [0] p(insert) = [8] x1 + [0] p(insert[Ite][False][Ite]) = [0] p(inssort) = [0] p(isort) = [0] p(<#) = [1] x2 + [0] p(insert#) = [1] x1 + [0] p(insert[Ite][False][Ite]#) = [8] x2 + [8] x3 + [0] p(inssort#) = [1] x1 + [0] p(isort#) = [4] x1 + [9] p(c_1) = [0] p(c_2) = [0] p(c_3) = [0] p(c_4) = [1] x1 + [5] p(c_5) = [0] p(c_6) = [0] p(c_7) = [0] p(c_8) = [1] x1 + [1] p(c_9) = [2] x1 + [0] p(c_10) = [1] Following rules are strictly oriented: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) = [4] x + [4] xs + [25] > [4] xs + [14] = c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))) Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented: ***** Step 1.b:7.b:2.b:3.a:2: Assumption WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak DPs: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/1,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: Assumption {assumed = Certificate {spaceUB = Unknown, spaceLB = Unknown, timeUB = Poly (Just 0), timeLB = Unknown}} + Details: () ***** Step 1.b:7.b:2.b:3.b:1: RemoveWeakSuffixes WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak DPs: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))) - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/1,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: RemoveWeakSuffixes + Details: Consider the dependency graph 1:W:isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))) -->_1 isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))):1 The following weak DPs constitute a sub-graph of the DG that is closed under successors. The DPs are removed. 1: isort#(Cons(x,xs),r) -> c_4(isort#(xs,insert(x,r))) ***** Step 1.b:7.b:2.b:3.b:2: EmptyProcessor WORST_CASE(?,O(1)) + Considered Problem: - Weak TRS: <(x,0()) -> False() <(0(),S(y)) -> True() <(S(x),S(y)) -> <(x,y) insert(x,Nil()) -> Cons(x,Nil()) insert(x',Cons(x,xs)) -> insert[Ite][False][Ite](<(x',x),x',Cons(x,xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](False(),x',Cons(x,xs)) -> Cons(x,insert(x',xs)) insert[Ite][False][Ite](True(),x,r) -> Cons(x,r) - Signature: {2,insert/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]/3,inssort/1,isort/2,<#/2,insert#/2,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#/3 ,inssort#/1,isort#/2} / {0/0,Cons/2,False/0,Nil/0,S/1,True/0,c_1/0,c_2/1,c_3/1,c_4/1,c_5/0,c_6/0,c_7/0,c_8/1 ,c_9/1,c_10/0} - Obligation: innermost runtime complexity wrt. defined symbols {<#,insert#,insert[Ite][False][Ite]#,inssort# ,isort#} and constructors {0,Cons,False,Nil,S,True} + Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor + Details: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1). WORST_CASE(Omega(n^1),O(n^2))