active(f(a, b, X)) → mark(f(X, X, X))
active(c) → mark(a)
active(c) → mark(b)
active(f(X1, X2, X3)) → f(X1, X2, active(X3))
f(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → mark(f(X1, X2, X3))
proper(f(X1, X2, X3)) → f(proper(X1), proper(X2), proper(X3))
proper(a) → ok(a)
proper(b) → ok(b)
proper(c) → ok(c)
f(ok(X1), ok(X2), ok(X3)) → ok(f(X1, X2, X3))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))
Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol.
Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
active'(f'(a', b', X)) → mark'(f'(X, X, X))
active'(c') → mark'(a')
active'(c') → mark'(b')
active'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(X1, X2, active'(X3))
f'(X1, X2, mark'(X3)) → mark'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
proper'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(proper'(X1), proper'(X2), proper'(X3))
proper'(a') → ok'(a')
proper'(b') → ok'(b')
proper'(c') → ok'(c')
f'(ok'(X1), ok'(X2), ok'(X3)) → ok'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
top'(mark'(X)) → top'(proper'(X))
top'(ok'(X)) → top'(active'(X))
Infered types.
Rules:
active'(f'(a', b', X)) → mark'(f'(X, X, X))
active'(c') → mark'(a')
active'(c') → mark'(b')
active'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(X1, X2, active'(X3))
f'(X1, X2, mark'(X3)) → mark'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
proper'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(proper'(X1), proper'(X2), proper'(X3))
proper'(a') → ok'(a')
proper'(b') → ok'(b')
proper'(c') → ok'(c')
f'(ok'(X1), ok'(X2), ok'(X3)) → ok'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
top'(mark'(X)) → top'(proper'(X))
top'(ok'(X)) → top'(active'(X))
Types:
active' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
f' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
a' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
b' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
mark' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
c' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
proper' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
ok' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
top' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → top'
_hole_a':b':mark':c':ok'1 :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
_hole_top'2 :: top'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3 :: Nat → a':b':mark':c':ok'
Heuristically decided to analyse the following defined symbols:
active', f', proper', top'
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
f' < active'
active' < top'
f' < proper'
proper' < top'
Rules:
active'(f'(a', b', X)) → mark'(f'(X, X, X))
active'(c') → mark'(a')
active'(c') → mark'(b')
active'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(X1, X2, active'(X3))
f'(X1, X2, mark'(X3)) → mark'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
proper'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(proper'(X1), proper'(X2), proper'(X3))
proper'(a') → ok'(a')
proper'(b') → ok'(b')
proper'(c') → ok'(c')
f'(ok'(X1), ok'(X2), ok'(X3)) → ok'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
top'(mark'(X)) → top'(proper'(X))
top'(ok'(X)) → top'(active'(X))
Types:
active' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
f' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
a' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
b' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
mark' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
c' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
proper' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
ok' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
top' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → top'
_hole_a':b':mark':c':ok'1 :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
_hole_top'2 :: top'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3 :: Nat → a':b':mark':c':ok'
Generator Equations:
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(0) ⇔ a'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
f', active', proper', top'
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
f' < active'
active' < top'
f' < proper'
proper' < top'
Proved the following rewrite lemma:
f'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(a), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(b), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(1, _n5))) → _*4, rt ∈ Ω(n5)
Induction Base:
f'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(a), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(b), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(1, 0)))
Induction Step:
f'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(_a1018), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(_b1019), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(1, +(_$n6, 1)))) →RΩ(1)
mark'(f'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(_a1018), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(_b1019), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(1, _$n6)))) →IH
mark'(_*4)
We have rt ∈ Ω(n) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have ircR ∈ Ω(n).
Rules:
active'(f'(a', b', X)) → mark'(f'(X, X, X))
active'(c') → mark'(a')
active'(c') → mark'(b')
active'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(X1, X2, active'(X3))
f'(X1, X2, mark'(X3)) → mark'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
proper'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(proper'(X1), proper'(X2), proper'(X3))
proper'(a') → ok'(a')
proper'(b') → ok'(b')
proper'(c') → ok'(c')
f'(ok'(X1), ok'(X2), ok'(X3)) → ok'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
top'(mark'(X)) → top'(proper'(X))
top'(ok'(X)) → top'(active'(X))
Types:
active' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
f' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
a' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
b' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
mark' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
c' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
proper' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
ok' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
top' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → top'
_hole_a':b':mark':c':ok'1 :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
_hole_top'2 :: top'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3 :: Nat → a':b':mark':c':ok'
Lemmas:
f'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(a), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(b), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(1, _n5))) → _*4, rt ∈ Ω(n5)
Generator Equations:
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(0) ⇔ a'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
active', proper', top'
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
active' < top'
proper' < top'
Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol active'.
Rules:
active'(f'(a', b', X)) → mark'(f'(X, X, X))
active'(c') → mark'(a')
active'(c') → mark'(b')
active'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(X1, X2, active'(X3))
f'(X1, X2, mark'(X3)) → mark'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
proper'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(proper'(X1), proper'(X2), proper'(X3))
proper'(a') → ok'(a')
proper'(b') → ok'(b')
proper'(c') → ok'(c')
f'(ok'(X1), ok'(X2), ok'(X3)) → ok'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
top'(mark'(X)) → top'(proper'(X))
top'(ok'(X)) → top'(active'(X))
Types:
active' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
f' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
a' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
b' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
mark' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
c' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
proper' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
ok' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
top' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → top'
_hole_a':b':mark':c':ok'1 :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
_hole_top'2 :: top'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3 :: Nat → a':b':mark':c':ok'
Lemmas:
f'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(a), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(b), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(1, _n5))) → _*4, rt ∈ Ω(n5)
Generator Equations:
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(0) ⇔ a'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
proper', top'
They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
proper' < top'
Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol proper'.
Rules:
active'(f'(a', b', X)) → mark'(f'(X, X, X))
active'(c') → mark'(a')
active'(c') → mark'(b')
active'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(X1, X2, active'(X3))
f'(X1, X2, mark'(X3)) → mark'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
proper'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(proper'(X1), proper'(X2), proper'(X3))
proper'(a') → ok'(a')
proper'(b') → ok'(b')
proper'(c') → ok'(c')
f'(ok'(X1), ok'(X2), ok'(X3)) → ok'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
top'(mark'(X)) → top'(proper'(X))
top'(ok'(X)) → top'(active'(X))
Types:
active' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
f' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
a' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
b' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
mark' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
c' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
proper' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
ok' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
top' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → top'
_hole_a':b':mark':c':ok'1 :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
_hole_top'2 :: top'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3 :: Nat → a':b':mark':c':ok'
Lemmas:
f'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(a), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(b), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(1, _n5))) → _*4, rt ∈ Ω(n5)
Generator Equations:
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(0) ⇔ a'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(x))
The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
top'
Could not prove a rewrite lemma for the defined symbol top'.
Rules:
active'(f'(a', b', X)) → mark'(f'(X, X, X))
active'(c') → mark'(a')
active'(c') → mark'(b')
active'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(X1, X2, active'(X3))
f'(X1, X2, mark'(X3)) → mark'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
proper'(f'(X1, X2, X3)) → f'(proper'(X1), proper'(X2), proper'(X3))
proper'(a') → ok'(a')
proper'(b') → ok'(b')
proper'(c') → ok'(c')
f'(ok'(X1), ok'(X2), ok'(X3)) → ok'(f'(X1, X2, X3))
top'(mark'(X)) → top'(proper'(X))
top'(ok'(X)) → top'(active'(X))
Types:
active' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
f' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
a' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
b' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
mark' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
c' :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
proper' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
ok' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → a':b':mark':c':ok'
top' :: a':b':mark':c':ok' → top'
_hole_a':b':mark':c':ok'1 :: a':b':mark':c':ok'
_hole_top'2 :: top'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3 :: Nat → a':b':mark':c':ok'
Lemmas:
f'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(a), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(b), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(1, _n5))) → _*4, rt ∈ Ω(n5)
Generator Equations:
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(0) ⇔ a'
_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(x, 1)) ⇔ mark'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(x))
No more defined symbols left to analyse.
The lowerbound Ω(n) was proven with the following lemma:
f'(_gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(a), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(b), _gen_a':b':mark':c':ok'3(+(1, _n5))) → _*4, rt ∈ Ω(n5)