We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the
certificate YES(?,O(n^10)).
Strict Trs:
{ f_0(x) -> a()
, f_1(x) -> g_1(x, x)
, g_1(s(x), y) -> b(f_0(y), g_1(x, y))
, f_2(x) -> g_2(x, x)
, g_2(s(x), y) -> b(f_1(y), g_2(x, y))
, f_3(x) -> g_3(x, x)
, g_3(s(x), y) -> b(f_2(y), g_3(x, y))
, f_4(x) -> g_4(x, x)
, g_4(s(x), y) -> b(f_3(y), g_4(x, y))
, f_5(x) -> g_5(x, x)
, g_5(s(x), y) -> b(f_4(y), g_5(x, y))
, f_6(x) -> g_6(x, x)
, g_6(s(x), y) -> b(f_5(y), g_6(x, y))
, f_7(x) -> g_7(x, x)
, g_7(s(x), y) -> b(f_6(y), g_7(x, y))
, f_8(x) -> g_8(x, x)
, g_8(s(x), y) -> b(f_7(y), g_8(x, y))
, f_9(x) -> g_9(x, x)
, g_9(s(x), y) -> b(f_8(y), g_9(x, y))
, f_10(x) -> g_10(x, x)
, g_10(s(x), y) -> b(f_9(y), g_10(x, y)) }
Obligation:
innermost runtime complexity
Answer:
YES(?,O(n^10))
The input was oriented with the instance of 'Small Polynomial Path
Order (PS,10-bounded)' as induced by the safe mapping
safe(f_0) = {1}, safe(a) = {}, safe(f_1) = {}, safe(g_1) = {},
safe(s) = {1}, safe(b) = {1, 2}, safe(f_2) = {}, safe(g_2) = {},
safe(f_3) = {}, safe(g_3) = {}, safe(f_4) = {}, safe(g_4) = {},
safe(f_5) = {}, safe(g_5) = {}, safe(f_6) = {}, safe(g_6) = {},
safe(f_7) = {}, safe(g_7) = {}, safe(f_8) = {}, safe(g_8) = {},
safe(f_9) = {}, safe(g_9) = {}, safe(f_10) = {}, safe(g_10) = {}
and precedence
f_1 > g_1, g_1 > f_0, f_2 > g_2, g_2 > f_1, f_3 > g_3, g_3 > f_2,
f_4 > g_4, g_4 > f_3, f_5 > g_5, g_5 > f_4, f_6 > g_6, g_6 > f_5,
f_7 > g_7, g_7 > f_6, f_8 > g_8, g_8 > f_7, f_9 > g_9, g_9 > f_8,
f_10 > g_10, g_10 > f_9 .
Following symbols are considered recursive:
{g_1, g_2, g_3, g_4, g_5, g_6, g_7, g_8, g_9, g_10}
The recursion depth is 10.
For your convenience, here are the satisfied ordering constraints:
f_0(; x) > a()
f_1(x;) > g_1(x, x;)
g_1(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_0(; y), g_1(x, y;))
f_2(x;) > g_2(x, x;)
g_2(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_1(y;), g_2(x, y;))
f_3(x;) > g_3(x, x;)
g_3(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_2(y;), g_3(x, y;))
f_4(x;) > g_4(x, x;)
g_4(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_3(y;), g_4(x, y;))
f_5(x;) > g_5(x, x;)
g_5(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_4(y;), g_5(x, y;))
f_6(x;) > g_6(x, x;)
g_6(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_5(y;), g_6(x, y;))
f_7(x;) > g_7(x, x;)
g_7(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_6(y;), g_7(x, y;))
f_8(x;) > g_8(x, x;)
g_8(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_7(y;), g_8(x, y;))
f_9(x;) > g_9(x, x;)
g_9(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_8(y;), g_9(x, y;))
f_10(x;) > g_10(x, x;)
g_10(s(; x), y;) > b(; f_9(y;), g_10(x, y;))
Hurray, we answered YES(?,O(n^10))