The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(O(1), O(n^2)).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

pred(s(x)) → x
minus(x, 0) → x
minus(x, s(y)) → pred(minus(x, y))
quot(0, s(y)) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST

(1) CpxTrsToCdtProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Converted Cpx (relative) TRS to CDT

(2) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

pred(s(z0)) → z0
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
quot(0, s(z0)) → 0
quot(s(z0), s(z1)) → s(quot(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)))

Tuples:

PRED(s(z0)) → c
MINUS(z0, 0) → c1
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(0, s(z0)) → c3
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))

S tuples:

PRED(s(z0)) → c
MINUS(z0, 0) → c1
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(0, s(z0)) → c3
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))

K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

pred, minus, quot

Defined Pair Symbols:

PRED, MINUS, QUOT

Compound Symbols:

c, c1, c2, c3, c4

(3) CdtLeafRemovalProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Removed 3 trailing nodes:

PRED(s(z0)) → c
MINUS(z0, 0) → c1
QUOT(0, s(z0)) → c3

(4) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

pred(s(z0)) → z0
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
quot(0, s(z0)) → 0
quot(s(z0), s(z1)) → s(quot(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)))

Tuples:

MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))

S tuples:

MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(PRED(minus(z0, z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))

K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

pred, minus, quot

Defined Pair Symbols:

MINUS, QUOT

Compound Symbols:

c2, c4

(5) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Removed 1 trailing tuple parts

(6) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

pred(s(z0)) → z0
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
quot(0, s(z0)) → 0
quot(s(z0), s(z1)) → s(quot(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)))

Tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

S tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

pred, minus, quot

Defined Pair Symbols:

QUOT, MINUS

Compound Symbols:

c4, c2

(7) CdtUsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following rules are not usable and were removed:

quot(0, s(z0)) → 0
quot(s(z0), s(z1)) → s(quot(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)))

(8) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
pred(s(z0)) → z0

Tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

S tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:

minus, pred

Defined Pair Symbols:

QUOT, MINUS

Compound Symbols:

c4, c2

(9) CdtRuleRemovalProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^1))) transformation)

Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))

We considered the (Usable) Rules:

minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
minus(z0, 0) → z0
pred(s(z0)) → z0

And the Tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :

POL(0) = 0   
POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(QUOT(x₁, x₂)) = x₁   
POL(c2(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(c4(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁   
POL(pred(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(s(x₁)) = [2] + x₁   

(10) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
pred(s(z0)) → z0

Tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

S tuples:

MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

K tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))

Defined Rule Symbols:

minus, pred

Defined Pair Symbols:

QUOT, MINUS

Compound Symbols:

c4, c2

(11) CdtRuleRemovalProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^2))) transformation)

Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.

MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

We considered the (Usable) Rules:

minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
minus(z0, 0) → z0
pred(s(z0)) → z0

And the Tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :

POL(0) = 0   
POL(MINUS(x₁, x₂)) = [2]x₂   
POL(QUOT(x₁, x₂)) = [2]x₁·x₂   
POL(c2(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(c4(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(minus(x₁, x₂)) = [1] + x₁   
POL(pred(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(s(x₁)) = [2] + x₁   

(12) Obligation:

Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:

minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(z0, s(z1)) → pred(minus(z0, z1))
pred(s(z0)) → z0

Tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

S tuples:none
K tuples:

QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c4(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(z0, s(z1)) → c2(MINUS(z0, z1))

Defined Rule Symbols:

minus, pred

Defined Pair Symbols:

QUOT, MINUS

Compound Symbols:

c4, c2

(13) SIsEmptyProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

The set S is empty

(14) BOUNDS(O(1), O(1))