*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
__(X,nil()) -> X
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
__(__(X,Y),Z) -> __(X,__(Y,Z))
__(nil(),X) -> X
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
activate(n__o()) -> o()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
e() -> n__e()
i() -> n__i()
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNePal(n____(I,__(P,I))) -> and(isQid(activate(I)),n__isPal(activate(P)))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
o() -> n__o()
u() -> n__u()
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
InnermostRuleRemoval
Proof:
Arguments of following rules are not normal-forms.
__(X,nil()) -> X
__(__(X,Y),Z) -> __(X,__(Y,Z))
__(nil(),X) -> X
isNePal(n____(I,__(P,I))) -> and(isQid(activate(I)),n__isPal(activate(P)))
All above mentioned rules can be savely removed.
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
activate(n__o()) -> o()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
e() -> n__e()
i() -> n__i()
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
o() -> n__o()
u() -> n__u()
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(and) = {1,2},
uargs(isList) = {1},
uargs(isNeList) = {1},
uargs(isNePal) = {1},
uargs(isQid) = {1},
uargs(n__isList) = {1},
uargs(n__isNeList) = {1}
Following symbols are considered usable:
{}
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(__) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(a) = [0]
p(activate) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(and) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [7]
p(e) = [0]
p(i) = [0]
p(isList) = [1] x1 + [3]
p(isNeList) = [1] x1 + [1]
p(isNePal) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isPal) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isQid) = [1] x1 + [5]
p(n____) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [5]
p(n__a) = [0]
p(n__e) = [0]
p(n__i) = [0]
p(n__isList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isNeList) = [1] x1 + [3]
p(n__isPal) = [1] x1 + [3]
p(n__nil) = [0]
p(n__o) = [5]
p(n__u) = [0]
p(nil) = [0]
p(o) = [0]
p(tt) = [0]
p(u) = [1]
Following rules are strictly oriented:
activate(n____(X1,X2)) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [5]
> [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
= __(X1,X2)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) = [1] X + [3]
> [1] X + [1]
= isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) = [1] X + [3]
> [1] X + [0]
= isPal(X)
activate(n__o()) = [5]
> [0]
= o()
and(tt(),X) = [1] X + [7]
> [1] X + [0]
= activate(X)
isList(V) = [1] V + [3]
> [1] V + [1]
= isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) = [1] X + [3]
> [1] X + [0]
= n__isList(X)
isList(n__nil()) = [3]
> [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__a()) = [5]
> [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__e()) = [5]
> [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__i()) = [5]
> [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__o()) = [10]
> [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__u()) = [5]
> [0]
= tt()
u() = [1]
> [0]
= n__u()
Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
__(X1,X2) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [5]
= n____(X1,X2)
a() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__a()
activate(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= X
activate(n__a()) = [0]
>= [0]
= a()
activate(n__e()) = [0]
>= [0]
= e()
activate(n__i()) = [0]
>= [0]
= i()
activate(n__isList(X)) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [3]
= isList(X)
activate(n__nil()) = [0]
>= [0]
= nil()
activate(n__u()) = [0]
>= [1]
= u()
e() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__e()
i() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__i()
isList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [10]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(V) = [1] V + [1]
>= [1] V + [5]
= isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) = [1] X + [1]
>= [1] X + [3]
= n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [6]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [13]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [6]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
= and(isNeList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [5]
= isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [3]
= n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
nil() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__nil()
o() = [0]
>= [5]
= n__o()
Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
e() -> n__e()
i() -> n__i()
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
o() -> n__o()
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__o()) -> o()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
u() -> n__u()
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(and) = {1,2},
uargs(isList) = {1},
uargs(isNeList) = {1},
uargs(isNePal) = {1},
uargs(isQid) = {1},
uargs(n__isList) = {1},
uargs(n__isNeList) = {1}
Following symbols are considered usable:
{}
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(__) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1]
p(a) = [0]
p(activate) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(and) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(e) = [0]
p(i) = [0]
p(isList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isNeList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isNePal) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isPal) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isQid) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n____) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1]
p(n__a) = [5]
p(n__e) = [4]
p(n__i) = [1]
p(n__isList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isNeList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isPal) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__nil) = [0]
p(n__o) = [1]
p(n__u) = [1]
p(nil) = [1]
p(o) = [1]
p(tt) = [0]
p(u) = [1]
Following rules are strictly oriented:
activate(n__a()) = [5]
> [0]
= a()
activate(n__e()) = [4]
> [0]
= e()
activate(n__i()) = [1]
> [0]
= i()
isList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [1]
> [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [0]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [1]
> [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [0]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [1]
> [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [0]
= and(isNeList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
nil() = [1]
> [0]
= n__nil()
Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
__(X1,X2) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [1]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [1]
= n____(X1,X2)
a() = [0]
>= [5]
= n__a()
activate(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [1]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [1]
= __(X1,X2)
activate(n__isList(X)) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= isList(X)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) = [0]
>= [1]
= nil()
activate(n__o()) = [1]
>= [1]
= o()
activate(n__u()) = [1]
>= [1]
= u()
and(tt(),X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= activate(X)
e() = [0]
>= [4]
= n__e()
i() = [0]
>= [1]
= n__i()
isList(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isList(X)
isList(n__nil()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isNeList(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isNeList(X)
isNePal(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__a()) = [5]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__e()) = [4]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__i()) = [1]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__o()) = [1]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__u()) = [1]
>= [0]
= tt()
o() = [1]
>= [1]
= n__o()
u() = [1]
>= [1]
= n__u()
Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
e() -> n__e()
i() -> n__i()
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
o() -> n__o()
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__o()) -> o()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
u() -> n__u()
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(and) = {1,2},
uargs(isList) = {1},
uargs(isNeList) = {1},
uargs(isNePal) = {1},
uargs(isQid) = {1},
uargs(n__isList) = {1},
uargs(n__isNeList) = {1}
Following symbols are considered usable:
{}
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(__) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [4]
p(a) = [1]
p(activate) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(and) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [4]
p(e) = [1]
p(i) = [1]
p(isList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isNeList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isNePal) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isPal) = [1] x1 + [5]
p(isQid) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(n____) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [4]
p(n__a) = [1]
p(n__e) = [1]
p(n__i) = [1]
p(n__isList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isNeList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isPal) = [1] x1 + [5]
p(n__nil) = [1]
p(n__o) = [3]
p(n__u) = [7]
p(nil) = [1]
p(o) = [0]
p(tt) = [0]
p(u) = [7]
Following rules are strictly oriented:
isPal(V) = [1] V + [5]
> [1] V + [0]
= isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(n__nil()) = [6]
> [0]
= tt()
Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
__(X1,X2) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [4]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [4]
= n____(X1,X2)
a() = [1]
>= [1]
= n__a()
activate(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [4]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [4]
= __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) = [1]
>= [1]
= a()
activate(n__e()) = [1]
>= [1]
= e()
activate(n__i()) = [1]
>= [1]
= i()
activate(n__isList(X)) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= isList(X)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) = [1] X + [5]
>= [1] X + [5]
= isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) = [1]
>= [1]
= nil()
activate(n__o()) = [3]
>= [0]
= o()
activate(n__u()) = [7]
>= [7]
= u()
and(tt(),X) = [1] X + [4]
>= [1] X + [0]
= activate(X)
e() = [1]
>= [1]
= n__e()
i() = [1]
>= [1]
= n__i()
isList(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) = [1]
>= [0]
= tt()
isNeList(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [2]
= isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
= and(isNeList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [2]
= isQid(activate(V))
isPal(X) = [1] X + [5]
>= [1] X + [5]
= n__isPal(X)
isQid(n__a()) = [3]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__e()) = [3]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__i()) = [3]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__o()) = [5]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__u()) = [9]
>= [0]
= tt()
nil() = [1]
>= [1]
= n__nil()
o() = [0]
>= [3]
= n__o()
u() = [7]
>= [7]
= n__u()
Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
e() -> n__e()
i() -> n__i()
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
o() -> n__o()
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__o()) -> o()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
u() -> n__u()
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(and) = {1,2},
uargs(isList) = {1},
uargs(isNeList) = {1},
uargs(isNePal) = {1},
uargs(isQid) = {1},
uargs(n__isList) = {1},
uargs(n__isNeList) = {1}
Following symbols are considered usable:
{}
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(__) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(a) = [2]
p(activate) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(and) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(e) = [0]
p(i) = [0]
p(isList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isNeList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isNePal) = [1] x1 + [6]
p(isPal) = [1] x1 + [6]
p(isQid) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n____) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(n__a) = [3]
p(n__e) = [6]
p(n__i) = [0]
p(n__isList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isNeList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isPal) = [1] x1 + [6]
p(n__nil) = [0]
p(n__o) = [2]
p(n__u) = [3]
p(nil) = [1]
p(o) = [0]
p(tt) = [0]
p(u) = [3]
Following rules are strictly oriented:
isNePal(V) = [1] V + [6]
> [1] V + [0]
= isQid(activate(V))
Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
__(X1,X2) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
= n____(X1,X2)
a() = [2]
>= [3]
= n__a()
activate(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
= __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) = [3]
>= [2]
= a()
activate(n__e()) = [6]
>= [0]
= e()
activate(n__i()) = [0]
>= [0]
= i()
activate(n__isList(X)) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= isList(X)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) = [1] X + [6]
>= [1] X + [6]
= isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) = [0]
>= [1]
= nil()
activate(n__o()) = [2]
>= [0]
= o()
activate(n__u()) = [3]
>= [3]
= u()
and(tt(),X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= activate(X)
e() = [0]
>= [6]
= n__e()
i() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__i()
isList(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [0]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [0]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isNeList(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [0]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [0]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [0]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [0]
= and(isNeList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isPal(V) = [1] V + [6]
>= [1] V + [6]
= isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) = [1] X + [6]
>= [1] X + [6]
= n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) = [6]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__a()) = [3]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__e()) = [6]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__i()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__o()) = [2]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__u()) = [3]
>= [0]
= tt()
nil() = [1]
>= [0]
= n__nil()
o() = [0]
>= [2]
= n__o()
u() = [3]
>= [3]
= n__u()
Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1.1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
e() -> n__e()
i() -> n__i()
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
o() -> n__o()
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__o()) -> o()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
u() -> n__u()
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(and) = {1,2},
uargs(isList) = {1},
uargs(isNeList) = {1},
uargs(isNePal) = {1},
uargs(isQid) = {1},
uargs(n__isList) = {1},
uargs(n__isNeList) = {1}
Following symbols are considered usable:
{}
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(__) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [7]
p(a) = [0]
p(activate) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(and) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(e) = [0]
p(i) = [0]
p(isList) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(isNeList) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(isNePal) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isPal) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(isQid) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n____) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [7]
p(n__a) = [0]
p(n__e) = [0]
p(n__i) = [0]
p(n__isList) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(n__isNeList) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(n__isPal) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__nil) = [0]
p(n__o) = [0]
p(n__u) = [0]
p(nil) = [0]
p(o) = [0]
p(tt) = [0]
p(u) = [0]
Following rules are strictly oriented:
isNeList(V) = [1] V + [2]
> [1] V + [0]
= isQid(activate(V))
Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
__(X1,X2) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [7]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [7]
= n____(X1,X2)
a() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__a()
activate(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [7]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [7]
= __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) = [0]
>= [0]
= a()
activate(n__e()) = [0]
>= [0]
= e()
activate(n__i()) = [0]
>= [0]
= i()
activate(n__isList(X)) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [2]
= isList(X)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [2]
= isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) = [0]
>= [0]
= nil()
activate(n__o()) = [0]
>= [0]
= o()
activate(n__u()) = [0]
>= [0]
= u()
and(tt(),X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= activate(X)
e() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__e()
i() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__i()
isList(V) = [1] V + [2]
>= [1] V + [2]
= isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [2]
= n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [9]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) = [2]
>= [0]
= tt()
isNeList(X) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [2]
= n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [9]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [9]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
= and(isNeList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) = [1] V + [0]
>= [1] V + [0]
= isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) = [1] X + [0]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__a()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__e()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__i()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__o()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__u()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
nil() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__nil()
o() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__o()
u() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__u()
Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1.1.1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
e() -> n__e()
i() -> n__i()
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
o() -> n__o()
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__o()) -> o()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
u() -> n__u()
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(and) = {1,2},
uargs(isList) = {1},
uargs(isNeList) = {1},
uargs(isNePal) = {1},
uargs(isQid) = {1},
uargs(n__isList) = {1},
uargs(n__isNeList) = {1}
Following symbols are considered usable:
{}
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(__) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(a) = [1]
p(activate) = [1] x1 + [1]
p(and) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [1]
p(e) = [4]
p(i) = [0]
p(isList) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(isNeList) = [1] x1 + [1]
p(isNePal) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(isPal) = [1] x1 + [3]
p(isQid) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n____) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [4]
p(n__a) = [0]
p(n__e) = [3]
p(n__i) = [1]
p(n__isList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isNeList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isPal) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(n__nil) = [0]
p(n__o) = [2]
p(n__u) = [1]
p(nil) = [2]
p(o) = [3]
p(tt) = [0]
p(u) = [1]
Following rules are strictly oriented:
a() = [1]
> [0]
= n__a()
activate(X) = [1] X + [1]
> [1] X + [0]
= X
activate(n__u()) = [2]
> [1]
= u()
e() = [4]
> [3]
= n__e()
isNeList(X) = [1] X + [1]
> [1] X + [0]
= n__isNeList(X)
isPal(X) = [1] X + [3]
> [1] X + [2]
= n__isPal(X)
o() = [3]
> [2]
= n__o()
Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
__(X1,X2) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [4]
= n____(X1,X2)
activate(n____(X1,X2)) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [5]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
= __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) = [1]
>= [1]
= a()
activate(n__e()) = [4]
>= [4]
= e()
activate(n__i()) = [2]
>= [0]
= i()
activate(n__isList(X)) = [1] X + [1]
>= [1] X + [2]
= isList(X)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) = [1] X + [1]
>= [1] X + [1]
= isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) = [1] X + [3]
>= [1] X + [3]
= isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) = [1]
>= [2]
= nil()
activate(n__o()) = [3]
>= [3]
= o()
and(tt(),X) = [1] X + [1]
>= [1] X + [1]
= activate(X)
i() = [0]
>= [1]
= n__i()
isList(V) = [1] V + [2]
>= [1] V + [2]
= isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [6]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [5]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) = [2]
>= [0]
= tt()
isNeList(V) = [1] V + [1]
>= [1] V + [1]
= isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [5]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [5]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [5]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [4]
= and(isNeList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) = [1] V + [2]
>= [1] V + [1]
= isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) = [1] V + [3]
>= [1] V + [3]
= isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(n__nil()) = [3]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__a()) = [0]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__e()) = [3]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__i()) = [1]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__o()) = [2]
>= [0]
= tt()
isQid(n__u()) = [1]
>= [0]
= tt()
nil() = [2]
>= [0]
= n__nil()
u() = [1]
>= [1]
= n__u()
Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
i() -> n__i()
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__o()) -> o()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
e() -> n__e()
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
o() -> n__o()
u() -> n__u()
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(and) = {1,2},
uargs(isList) = {1},
uargs(isNeList) = {1},
uargs(isNePal) = {1},
uargs(isQid) = {1},
uargs(n__isList) = {1},
uargs(n__isNeList) = {1}
Following symbols are considered usable:
{}
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(__) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(a) = [3]
p(activate) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(and) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(e) = [4]
p(i) = [5]
p(isList) = [1] x1 + [4]
p(isNeList) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(isNePal) = [1] x1 + [4]
p(isPal) = [1] x1 + [6]
p(isQid) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n____) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [6]
p(n__a) = [2]
p(n__e) = [4]
p(n__i) = [4]
p(n__isList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isNeList) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n__isPal) = [1] x1 + [4]
p(n__nil) = [0]
p(n__o) = [2]
p(n__u) = [4]
p(nil) = [0]
p(o) = [2]
p(tt) = [2]
p(u) = [5]
Following rules are strictly oriented:
activate(n__nil()) = [2]
> [0]
= nil()
i() = [5]
> [4]
= n__i()
Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
__(X1,X2) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [6]
= n____(X1,X2)
a() = [3]
>= [2]
= n__a()
activate(X) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [0]
= X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [8]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [0]
= __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) = [4]
>= [3]
= a()
activate(n__e()) = [6]
>= [4]
= e()
activate(n__i()) = [6]
>= [5]
= i()
activate(n__isList(X)) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [4]
= isList(X)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [2]
= isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) = [1] X + [6]
>= [1] X + [6]
= isPal(X)
activate(n__o()) = [4]
>= [2]
= o()
activate(n__u()) = [6]
>= [5]
= u()
and(tt(),X) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [2]
= activate(X)
e() = [4]
>= [4]
= n__e()
isList(V) = [1] V + [4]
>= [1] V + [4]
= isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) = [1] X + [4]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [10]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) = [4]
>= [2]
= tt()
isNeList(V) = [1] V + [2]
>= [1] V + [2]
= isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [0]
= n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [6]
= and(isNeList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) = [1] V + [4]
>= [1] V + [2]
= isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) = [1] V + [6]
>= [1] V + [6]
= isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) = [1] X + [6]
>= [1] X + [4]
= n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) = [6]
>= [2]
= tt()
isQid(n__a()) = [2]
>= [2]
= tt()
isQid(n__e()) = [4]
>= [2]
= tt()
isQid(n__i()) = [4]
>= [2]
= tt()
isQid(n__o()) = [2]
>= [2]
= tt()
isQid(n__u()) = [4]
>= [2]
= tt()
nil() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__nil()
o() = [2]
>= [2]
= n__o()
u() = [5]
>= [4]
= n__u()
Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
activate(n__o()) -> o()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
e() -> n__e()
i() -> n__i()
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
o() -> n__o()
u() -> n__u()
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
Proof:
The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
The following argument positions are considered usable:
uargs(and) = {1,2},
uargs(isList) = {1},
uargs(isNeList) = {1},
uargs(isNePal) = {1},
uargs(isQid) = {1},
uargs(n__isList) = {1},
uargs(n__isNeList) = {1}
Following symbols are considered usable:
{}
TcT has computed the following interpretation:
p(__) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [7]
p(a) = [7]
p(activate) = [1] x1 + [1]
p(and) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [0]
p(e) = [1]
p(i) = [4]
p(isList) = [1] x1 + [4]
p(isNeList) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(isNePal) = [1] x1 + [1]
p(isPal) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(isQid) = [1] x1 + [0]
p(n____) = [1] x1 + [1] x2 + [6]
p(n__a) = [7]
p(n__e) = [1]
p(n__i) = [4]
p(n__isList) = [1] x1 + [4]
p(n__isNeList) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(n__isPal) = [1] x1 + [2]
p(n__nil) = [0]
p(n__o) = [3]
p(n__u) = [1]
p(nil) = [0]
p(o) = [3]
p(tt) = [1]
p(u) = [2]
Following rules are strictly oriented:
__(X1,X2) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [7]
> [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [6]
= n____(X1,X2)
activate(n__isList(X)) = [1] X + [5]
> [1] X + [4]
= isList(X)
Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
a() = [7]
>= [7]
= n__a()
activate(X) = [1] X + [1]
>= [1] X + [0]
= X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) = [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [7]
>= [1] X1 + [1] X2 + [7]
= __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) = [8]
>= [7]
= a()
activate(n__e()) = [2]
>= [1]
= e()
activate(n__i()) = [5]
>= [4]
= i()
activate(n__isNeList(X)) = [1] X + [3]
>= [1] X + [2]
= isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) = [1] X + [3]
>= [1] X + [2]
= isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) = [1]
>= [0]
= nil()
activate(n__o()) = [4]
>= [3]
= o()
activate(n__u()) = [2]
>= [2]
= u()
and(tt(),X) = [1] X + [1]
>= [1] X + [1]
= activate(X)
e() = [1]
>= [1]
= n__e()
i() = [4]
>= [4]
= n__i()
isList(V) = [1] V + [4]
>= [1] V + [3]
= isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) = [1] X + [4]
>= [1] X + [4]
= n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [10]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [10]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) = [4]
>= [1]
= tt()
isNeList(V) = [1] V + [2]
>= [1] V + [1]
= isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [2]
= n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
= and(isList(activate(V1))
,n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) = [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
>= [1] V1 + [1] V2 + [8]
= and(isNeList(activate(V1))
,n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) = [1] V + [1]
>= [1] V + [1]
= isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) = [1] V + [2]
>= [1] V + [2]
= isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) = [1] X + [2]
>= [1] X + [2]
= n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) = [2]
>= [1]
= tt()
isQid(n__a()) = [7]
>= [1]
= tt()
isQid(n__e()) = [1]
>= [1]
= tt()
isQid(n__i()) = [4]
>= [1]
= tt()
isQid(n__o()) = [3]
>= [1]
= tt()
isQid(n__u()) = [1]
>= [1]
= tt()
nil() = [0]
>= [0]
= n__nil()
o() = [3]
>= [3]
= n__o()
u() = [2]
>= [1]
= n__u()
Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
__(X1,X2) -> n____(X1,X2)
a() -> n__a()
activate(X) -> X
activate(n____(X1,X2)) -> __(X1,X2)
activate(n__a()) -> a()
activate(n__e()) -> e()
activate(n__i()) -> i()
activate(n__isList(X)) -> isList(X)
activate(n__isNeList(X)) -> isNeList(X)
activate(n__isPal(X)) -> isPal(X)
activate(n__nil()) -> nil()
activate(n__o()) -> o()
activate(n__u()) -> u()
and(tt(),X) -> activate(X)
e() -> n__e()
i() -> n__i()
isList(V) -> isNeList(activate(V))
isList(X) -> n__isList(X)
isList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isList(n__nil()) -> tt()
isNeList(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isNeList(X) -> n__isNeList(X)
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isList(activate(V1)),n__isNeList(activate(V2)))
isNeList(n____(V1,V2)) -> and(isNeList(activate(V1)),n__isList(activate(V2)))
isNePal(V) -> isQid(activate(V))
isPal(V) -> isNePal(activate(V))
isPal(X) -> n__isPal(X)
isPal(n__nil()) -> tt()
isQid(n__a()) -> tt()
isQid(n__e()) -> tt()
isQid(n__i()) -> tt()
isQid(n__o()) -> tt()
isQid(n__u()) -> tt()
nil() -> n__nil()
o() -> n__o()
u() -> n__u()
Signature:
{__/2,a/0,activate/1,and/2,e/0,i/0,isList/1,isNeList/1,isNePal/1,isPal/1,isQid/1,nil/0,o/0,u/0} / {n____/2,n__a/0,n__e/0,n__i/0,n__isList/1,n__isNeList/1,n__isPal/1,n__nil/0,n__o/0,n__u/0,tt/0}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {__,a,activate,and,e,i,isList,isNeList,isNePal,isPal,isQid,nil,o,u}/{n____,n__a,n__e,n__i,n__isList,n__isNeList,n__isPal,n__nil,n__o,n__u,tt}
Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
Proof:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).