*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        a__f(X) -> f(X)
        a__f(X) -> g(h(f(X)))
        mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X))
        mark(g(X)) -> g(X)
        mark(h(X)) -> h(mark(X))
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        
      Signature:
        {a__f/1,mark/1} / {f/1,g/1,h/1}
      Obligation:
        Innermost
        basic terms: {a__f,mark}/{f,g,h}
    Applied Processor:
      Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    Proof:
      The problem is match-bounded by 2.
      The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
        a__f_0(2) -> 1
        a__f_1(4) -> 1
        a__f_1(4) -> 4
        f_0(2) -> 2
        f_1(2) -> 1
        f_2(4) -> 1
        f_2(4) -> 4
        g_0(2) -> 2
        g_1(2) -> 1
        g_1(2) -> 4
        g_1(3) -> 1
        g_2(5) -> 1
        g_2(5) -> 4
        h_0(2) -> 2
        h_1(1) -> 3
        h_1(4) -> 1
        h_1(4) -> 4
        h_2(1) -> 5
        mark_0(2) -> 1
        mark_1(2) -> 4
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        a__f(X) -> f(X)
        a__f(X) -> g(h(f(X)))
        mark(f(X)) -> a__f(mark(X))
        mark(g(X)) -> g(X)
        mark(h(X)) -> h(mark(X))
      Signature:
        {a__f/1,mark/1} / {f/1,g/1,h/1}
      Obligation:
        Innermost
        basic terms: {a__f,mark}/{f,g,h}
    Applied Processor:
      EmptyProcessor
    Proof:
      The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).