*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
f(+(x,y)) -> *(f(x),f(y))
f(+(x,s(0()))) -> +(s(s(0())),f(x))
f(0()) -> s(0())
f(s(0())) -> *(s(s(0())),f(0()))
f(s(0())) -> s(s(0()))
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{f/1} / {*/2,+/2,0/0,s/1}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {f}/{*,+,0,s}
Applied Processor:
Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match}
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 2.
The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
*_0(1,1) -> 1
*_0(1,2) -> 1
*_0(1,3) -> 1
*_0(1,5) -> 1
*_0(2,1) -> 1
*_0(2,2) -> 1
*_0(2,3) -> 1
*_0(2,5) -> 1
*_0(3,1) -> 1
*_0(3,2) -> 1
*_0(3,3) -> 1
*_0(3,5) -> 1
*_0(5,1) -> 1
*_0(5,2) -> 1
*_0(5,3) -> 1
*_0(5,5) -> 1
*_1(6,7) -> 4
*_1(7,7) -> 4
*_1(7,7) -> 7
*_1(8,11) -> 4
*_1(8,11) -> 7
+_0(1,1) -> 2
+_0(1,2) -> 2
+_0(1,3) -> 2
+_0(1,5) -> 2
+_0(2,1) -> 2
+_0(2,2) -> 2
+_0(2,3) -> 2
+_0(2,5) -> 2
+_0(3,1) -> 2
+_0(3,2) -> 2
+_0(3,3) -> 2
+_0(3,5) -> 2
+_0(5,1) -> 2
+_0(5,2) -> 2
+_0(5,3) -> 2
+_0(5,5) -> 2
+_1(8,7) -> 4
+_1(8,7) -> 7
0_0() -> 3
0_1() -> 10
0_2() -> 12
f_0(1) -> 4
f_0(2) -> 4
f_0(3) -> 4
f_0(5) -> 4
f_1(1) -> 6
f_1(1) -> 7
f_1(2) -> 7
f_1(3) -> 7
f_1(5) -> 7
f_1(10) -> 11
s_0(1) -> 5
s_0(2) -> 5
s_0(3) -> 5
s_0(5) -> 5
s_1(9) -> 4
s_1(9) -> 7
s_1(9) -> 8
s_1(10) -> 4
s_1(10) -> 7
s_1(10) -> 9
s_2(12) -> 11
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
f(+(x,y)) -> *(f(x),f(y))
f(+(x,s(0()))) -> +(s(s(0())),f(x))
f(0()) -> s(0())
f(s(0())) -> *(s(s(0())),f(0()))
f(s(0())) -> s(s(0()))
Signature:
{f/1} / {*/2,+/2,0/0,s/1}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {f}/{*,+,0,s}
Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
Proof:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).