*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: f(x) -> x f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f,g}/{c,d,s} Applied Processor: InnermostRuleRemoval Proof: Arguments of following rules are not normal-forms. f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x))) All above mentioned rules can be savely removed. *** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: f(x) -> x f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f,g}/{c,d,s} Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} Proof: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. c_0(2,2) -> 1 c_0(2,2) -> 2 c_1(2,4) -> 1 c_1(2,4) -> 3 c_1(4,2) -> 5 d_0(2) -> 1 d_0(2) -> 2 f_0(2) -> 1 f_1(3) -> 1 g_0(2) -> 1 g_1(5) -> 1 s_0(2) -> 1 s_0(2) -> 2 s_1(2) -> 4 s_1(4) -> 4 2 -> 1 3 -> 1 *** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: f(x) -> x f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y))) g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y)) Signature: {f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f,g}/{c,d,s} Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor Proof: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).