*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
f(x) -> x
f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y)))
f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x)))
g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y))
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {f,g}/{c,d,s}
Applied Processor:
InnermostRuleRemoval
Proof:
Arguments of following rules are not normal-forms.
f(f(x)) -> f(d(f(x)))
All above mentioned rules can be savely removed.
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
f(x) -> x
f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y)))
g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y))
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {f,g}/{c,d,s}
Applied Processor:
Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 1.
The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
c_0(2,2) -> 1
c_0(2,2) -> 2
c_1(2,4) -> 1
c_1(2,4) -> 3
c_1(4,2) -> 5
d_0(2) -> 1
d_0(2) -> 2
f_0(2) -> 1
f_1(3) -> 1
g_0(2) -> 1
g_1(5) -> 1
s_0(2) -> 1
s_0(2) -> 2
s_1(2) -> 4
s_1(4) -> 4
2 -> 1
3 -> 1
*** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
f(x) -> x
f(c(s(x),y)) -> f(c(x,s(y)))
g(c(x,s(y))) -> g(c(s(x),y))
Signature:
{f/1,g/1} / {c/2,d/1,s/1}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {f,g}/{c,d,s}
Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
Proof:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).