*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        f(0(),y) -> 0()
        f(s(x),y) -> f(f(x,y),y)
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        
      Signature:
        {f/2} / {0/0,s/1}
      Obligation:
        Innermost
        basic terms: {f}/{0,s}
    Applied Processor:
      WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
    Proof:
      The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
        We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
        The following argument positions are considered usable:
          uargs(f) = {1}
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          {}
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
          p(0) = [0]         
          p(f) = [1] x1 + [0]
          p(s) = [1] x1 + [1]
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
        f(s(x),y) = [1] x + [1]
                  > [1] x + [0]
                  = f(f(x,y),y)
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        f(0(),y) =  [0]
                 >= [0]
                 =  0()
        
      Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        f(0(),y) -> 0()
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        f(s(x),y) -> f(f(x,y),y)
      Signature:
        {f/2} / {0/0,s/1}
      Obligation:
        Innermost
        basic terms: {f}/{0,s}
    Applied Processor:
      WeightGap {wgDimension = 1, wgDegree = 1, wgKind = Algebraic, wgUArgs = UArgs, wgOn = WgOnAny}
    Proof:
      The weightgap principle applies using the following nonconstant growth matrix-interpretation:
        We apply a matrix interpretation of kind constructor based matrix interpretation:
        The following argument positions are considered usable:
          uargs(f) = {1}
        
        Following symbols are considered usable:
          {}
        TcT has computed the following interpretation:
          p(0) = [2]         
          p(f) = [1] x1 + [4]
          p(s) = [1] x1 + [4]
        
        Following rules are strictly oriented:
        f(0(),y) = [6]
                 > [2]
                 = 0()
        
        
        Following rules are (at-least) weakly oriented:
        f(s(x),y) =  [1] x + [8]
                  >= [1] x + [8]
                  =  f(f(x,y),y)
        
      Further, it can be verified that all rules not oriented are covered by the weightgap condition.
*** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        f(0(),y) -> 0()
        f(s(x),y) -> f(f(x,y),y)
      Signature:
        {f/2} / {0/0,s/1}
      Obligation:
        Innermost
        basic terms: {f}/{0,s}
    Applied Processor:
      EmptyProcessor
    Proof:
      The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).