*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
h(f(x,y)) -> f(y,f(h(h(x)),a()))
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{h/1} / {a/0,f/2}
Obligation:
Full
basic terms: {h}/{a,f}
Applied Processor:
ToInnermost
Proof:
switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
h(f(x,y)) -> f(y,f(h(h(x)),a()))
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{h/1} / {a/0,f/2}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {h}/{a,f}
Applied Processor:
Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
Proof:
The problem is match-bounded by 2.
The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
a_0() -> 2
a_1() -> 5
a_2() -> 9
f_0(2,2) -> 2
f_1(2,3) -> 1
f_1(2,3) -> 6
f_1(2,3) -> 10
f_1(4,5) -> 3
f_2(3,7) -> 4
f_2(3,7) -> 8
f_2(8,9) -> 7
h_0(2) -> 1
h_1(2) -> 6
h_1(6) -> 4
h_2(2) -> 10
h_2(10) -> 8
*** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
h(f(x,y)) -> f(y,f(h(h(x)),a()))
Signature:
{h/1} / {a/0,f/2}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {h}/{a,f}
Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
Proof:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).