*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: g(x,s(y)) -> g(f(x,y),0()) g(0(),f(x,x)) -> x g(f(x,y),0()) -> f(g(x,0()),g(y,0())) g(s(x),y) -> g(f(x,y),0()) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {g/2} / {0/0,f/2,s/1} Obligation: Full basic terms: {g}/{0,f,s} Applied Processor: ToInnermost Proof: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules *** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: g(x,s(y)) -> g(f(x,y),0()) g(0(),f(x,x)) -> x g(f(x,y),0()) -> f(g(x,0()),g(y,0())) g(s(x),y) -> g(f(x,y),0()) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {g/2} / {0/0,f/2,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {g}/{0,f,s} Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} Proof: The problem is match-bounded by 2. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. 0_0() -> 1 0_0() -> 2 0_1() -> 4 0_2() -> 9 0_2() -> 10 f_0(2,2) -> 1 f_0(2,2) -> 2 f_1(2,2) -> 3 f_1(2,4) -> 1 f_1(2,4) -> 2 f_1(2,9) -> 11 f_1(2,10) -> 12 f_1(5,6) -> 1 f_1(6,6) -> 5 f_1(6,6) -> 6 f_1(6,6) -> 7 f_1(6,6) -> 8 f_2(7,8) -> 1 f_2(8,13) -> 5 f_2(8,13) -> 6 f_2(8,13) -> 7 f_2(8,13) -> 8 g_0(2,2) -> 1 g_1(2,4) -> 5 g_1(2,4) -> 6 g_1(3,4) -> 1 g_1(4,4) -> 6 g_1(11,4) -> 7 g_1(12,4) -> 8 g_2(2,9) -> 7 g_2(2,10) -> 8 g_2(4,10) -> 13 g_2(9,10) -> 13 g_2(10,10) -> 13 s_0(2) -> 1 s_0(2) -> 2 2 -> 1 *** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: g(x,s(y)) -> g(f(x,y),0()) g(0(),f(x,x)) -> x g(f(x,y),0()) -> f(g(x,0()),g(y,0())) g(s(x),y) -> g(f(x,y),0()) Signature: {g/2} / {0/0,f/2,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {g}/{0,f,s} Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor Proof: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).