*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(a())) -> a__f(g(f(a()))) mark(a()) -> a() mark(f(X)) -> a__f(X) mark(g(X)) -> g(mark(X)) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {a/0,f/1,g/1} Obligation: Full basic terms: {a__f,mark}/{a,f,g} Applied Processor: ToInnermost Proof: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules *** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(a())) -> a__f(g(f(a()))) mark(a()) -> a() mark(f(X)) -> a__f(X) mark(g(X)) -> g(mark(X)) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {a/0,f/1,g/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {a__f,mark}/{a,f,g} Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = perSymbol, enrichment = match} Proof: The problem is match-bounded by 2. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. a_0() -> 1 a_1() -> 5 a_1() -> 8 a_1() -> 9 a__f_0(1) -> 2 a__f_0(3) -> 2 a__f_0(4) -> 2 a__f_1(1) -> 5 a__f_1(1) -> 9 a__f_1(3) -> 5 a__f_1(3) -> 9 a__f_1(4) -> 5 a__f_1(4) -> 9 a__f_1(6) -> 2 a__f_1(6) -> 5 a__f_1(6) -> 9 f_0(1) -> 3 f_0(3) -> 3 f_0(4) -> 3 f_1(1) -> 2 f_1(3) -> 2 f_1(4) -> 2 f_1(8) -> 7 f_2(1) -> 5 f_2(1) -> 9 f_2(3) -> 5 f_2(3) -> 9 f_2(4) -> 5 f_2(4) -> 9 f_2(6) -> 2 f_2(6) -> 5 f_2(6) -> 9 g_0(1) -> 4 g_0(3) -> 4 g_0(4) -> 4 g_1(7) -> 6 g_1(9) -> 5 g_1(9) -> 9 mark_0(1) -> 5 mark_0(3) -> 5 mark_0(4) -> 5 mark_1(1) -> 9 mark_1(3) -> 9 mark_1(4) -> 9 *** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: a__f(X) -> f(X) a__f(f(a())) -> a__f(g(f(a()))) mark(a()) -> a() mark(f(X)) -> a__f(X) mark(g(X)) -> g(mark(X)) Signature: {a__f/1,mark/1} / {a/0,f/1,g/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {a__f,mark}/{a,f,g} Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor Proof: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).