*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
f(g(x),g(y)) -> f(p(f(g(x),s(y))),g(s(p(x))))
g(s(p(x))) -> p(x)
p(0()) -> g(0())
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{f/2,g/1,p/1} / {0/0,s/1}
Obligation:
Full
basic terms: {f,g,p}/{0,s}
Applied Processor:
DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT}
Proof:
We add the following weak dependency pairs:
Strict DPs
f#(g(x),g(y)) -> c_1(f#(p(f(g(x),s(y))),g(s(p(x)))))
g#(s(p(x))) -> c_2(p#(x))
p#(0()) -> c_3(g#(0()))
Weak DPs
and mark the set of starting terms.
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
f#(g(x),g(y)) -> c_1(f#(p(f(g(x),s(y))),g(s(p(x)))))
g#(s(p(x))) -> c_2(p#(x))
p#(0()) -> c_3(g#(0()))
Strict TRS Rules:
f(g(x),g(y)) -> f(p(f(g(x),s(y))),g(s(p(x))))
g(s(p(x))) -> p(x)
p(0()) -> g(0())
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{f/2,g/1,p/1,f#/2,g#/1,p#/1} / {0/0,s/1,c_1/1,c_2/1,c_3/1}
Obligation:
Full
basic terms: {f#,g#,p#}/{0,s}
Applied Processor:
UsableRules
Proof:
We replace rewrite rules by usable rules:
p#(0()) -> c_3(g#(0()))
*** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
p#(0()) -> c_3(g#(0()))
Strict TRS Rules:
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{f/2,g/1,p/1,f#/2,g#/1,p#/1} / {0/0,s/1,c_1/1,c_2/1,c_3/1}
Obligation:
Full
basic terms: {f#,g#,p#}/{0,s}
Applied Processor:
Trivial
Proof:
Consider the dependency graph
1:S:p#(0()) -> c_3(g#(0()))
The dependency graph contains no loops, we remove all dependency pairs.
*** 1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{f/2,g/1,p/1,f#/2,g#/1,p#/1} / {0/0,s/1,c_1/1,c_2/1,c_3/1}
Obligation:
Full
basic terms: {f#,g#,p#}/{0,s}
Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
Proof:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).