*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: f(s(X)) -> f(X) g(cons(0(),Y)) -> g(Y) g(cons(s(X),Y)) -> s(X) h(cons(X,Y)) -> h(g(cons(X,Y))) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/1,g/1,h/1} / {0/0,cons/2,s/1} Obligation: Full basic terms: {f,g,h}/{0,cons,s} Applied Processor: ToInnermost Proof: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules *** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: f(s(X)) -> f(X) g(cons(0(),Y)) -> g(Y) g(cons(s(X),Y)) -> s(X) h(cons(X,Y)) -> h(g(cons(X,Y))) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/1,g/1,h/1} / {0/0,cons/2,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f,g,h}/{0,cons,s} Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} Proof: The problem is match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. 0_0() -> 2 cons_0(2,2) -> 2 cons_1(2,2) -> 4 f_0(2) -> 1 f_1(2) -> 1 g_0(2) -> 1 g_1(2) -> 1 g_1(2) -> 3 g_1(4) -> 3 h_0(2) -> 1 h_1(3) -> 1 s_0(2) -> 2 s_1(2) -> 1 s_1(2) -> 3 *** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: f(s(X)) -> f(X) g(cons(0(),Y)) -> g(Y) g(cons(s(X),Y)) -> s(X) h(cons(X,Y)) -> h(g(cons(X,Y))) Signature: {f/1,g/1,h/1} / {0/0,cons/2,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f,g,h}/{0,cons,s} Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor Proof: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).