*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        g(x,h(y,z)) -> h(g(x,y),z)
        g(f(x,y),z) -> f(x,g(y,z))
        g(h(x,y),z) -> g(x,f(y,z))
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        
      Signature:
        {g/2} / {f/2,h/2}
      Obligation:
        Full
        basic terms: {g}/{f,h}
    Applied Processor:
      ToInnermost
    Proof:
      switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        g(x,h(y,z)) -> h(g(x,y),z)
        g(f(x,y),z) -> f(x,g(y,z))
        g(h(x,y),z) -> g(x,f(y,z))
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        
      Signature:
        {g/2} / {f/2,h/2}
      Obligation:
        Innermost
        basic terms: {g}/{f,h}
    Applied Processor:
      Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    Proof:
      The problem is match-bounded by 1.
      The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
        f_0(2,2) -> 2
        f_1(2,2) -> 4
        f_1(2,3) -> 1
        f_1(2,3) -> 3
        f_1(2,4) -> 4
        g_0(2,2) -> 1
        g_1(2,2) -> 3
        g_1(2,4) -> 1
        g_1(2,4) -> 3
        h_0(2,2) -> 2
        h_1(3,2) -> 1
        h_1(3,2) -> 3
*** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        g(x,h(y,z)) -> h(g(x,y),z)
        g(f(x,y),z) -> f(x,g(y,z))
        g(h(x,y),z) -> g(x,f(y,z))
      Signature:
        {g/2} / {f/2,h/2}
      Obligation:
        Innermost
        basic terms: {g}/{f,h}
    Applied Processor:
      EmptyProcessor
    Proof:
      The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).