*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
a(b(x)) -> a(c(b(x)))
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{a/1} / {b/1,c/1}
Obligation:
Full
basic terms: {a}/{b,c}
Applied Processor:
ToInnermost
Proof:
switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
a(b(x)) -> a(c(b(x)))
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{a/1} / {b/1,c/1}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {a}/{b,c}
Applied Processor:
DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT}
Proof:
We add the following dependency tuples:
Strict DPs
a#(b(x)) -> c_1(a#(c(b(x))))
Weak DPs
and mark the set of starting terms.
*** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
a#(b(x)) -> c_1(a#(c(b(x))))
Strict TRS Rules:
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
a(b(x)) -> a(c(b(x)))
Signature:
{a/1,a#/1} / {b/1,c/1,c_1/1}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {a#}/{b,c}
Applied Processor:
UsableRules
Proof:
We replace rewrite rules by usable rules:
a#(b(x)) -> c_1(a#(c(b(x))))
*** 1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
a#(b(x)) -> c_1(a#(c(b(x))))
Strict TRS Rules:
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{a/1,a#/1} / {b/1,c/1,c_1/1}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {a#}/{b,c}
Applied Processor:
Trivial
Proof:
Consider the dependency graph
1:S:a#(b(x)) -> c_1(a#(c(b(x))))
The dependency graph contains no loops, we remove all dependency pairs.
*** 1.1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] ***
Considered Problem:
Strict DP Rules:
Strict TRS Rules:
Weak DP Rules:
Weak TRS Rules:
Signature:
{a/1,a#/1} / {b/1,c/1,c_1/1}
Obligation:
Innermost
basic terms: {a#}/{b,c}
Applied Processor:
EmptyProcessor
Proof:
The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).