*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        rev(++(x,x)) -> rev(x)
        rev(++(x,y)) -> ++(rev(y),rev(x))
        rev(a()) -> a()
        rev(b()) -> b()
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        
      Signature:
        {rev/1} / {++/2,a/0,b/0}
      Obligation:
        Full
        basic terms: {rev}/{++,a,b}
    Applied Processor:
      ToInnermost
    Proof:
      switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules
*** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        rev(++(x,x)) -> rev(x)
        rev(++(x,y)) -> ++(rev(y),rev(x))
        rev(a()) -> a()
        rev(b()) -> b()
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        
      Signature:
        {rev/1} / {++/2,a/0,b/0}
      Obligation:
        Innermost
        basic terms: {rev}/{++,a,b}
    Applied Processor:
      Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match}
    Proof:
      The problem is match-bounded by 1.
      The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton.
        ++_0(2,2) -> 2
        ++_1(1,1) -> 1
        a_0() -> 2
        a_1() -> 1
        b_0() -> 2
        b_1() -> 1
        rev_0(2) -> 1
        rev_1(2) -> 1
*** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))]  ***
    Considered Problem:
      Strict DP Rules:
        
      Strict TRS Rules:
        
      Weak DP Rules:
        
      Weak TRS Rules:
        rev(++(x,x)) -> rev(x)
        rev(++(x,y)) -> ++(rev(y),rev(x))
        rev(a()) -> a()
        rev(b()) -> b()
      Signature:
        {rev/1} / {++/2,a/0,b/0}
      Obligation:
        Innermost
        basic terms: {rev}/{++,a,b}
    Applied Processor:
      EmptyProcessor
    Proof:
      The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).