*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: f(a(),a()) -> f(a(),b()) f(a(),b()) -> f(s(a()),c()) f(c(),c()) -> f(a(),a()) f(s(X),c()) -> f(X,c()) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/2} / {a/0,b/0,c/0,s/1} Obligation: Full basic terms: {f}/{a,b,c,s} Applied Processor: ToInnermost Proof: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules *** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(n^1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: f(a(),a()) -> f(a(),b()) f(a(),b()) -> f(s(a()),c()) f(c(),c()) -> f(a(),a()) f(s(X),c()) -> f(X,c()) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/2} / {a/0,b/0,c/0,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f}/{a,b,c,s} Applied Processor: Bounds {initialAutomaton = minimal, enrichment = match} Proof: The problem is match-bounded by 4. The enriched problem is compatible with follwoing automaton. a_0() -> 2 a_1() -> 3 a_2() -> 7 a_3() -> 10 b_0() -> 2 b_1() -> 4 b_2() -> 9 c_0() -> 2 c_1() -> 4 c_2() -> 6 c_3() -> 8 c_4() -> 11 f_0(2,2) -> 1 f_1(2,4) -> 1 f_1(3,3) -> 1 f_1(3,4) -> 1 f_2(3,6) -> 1 f_2(5,6) -> 1 f_2(7,9) -> 1 f_3(7,8) -> 1 f_4(10,11) -> 1 s_0(2) -> 2 s_1(3) -> 3 s_2(7) -> 5 s_3(10) -> 7 *** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: f(a(),a()) -> f(a(),b()) f(a(),b()) -> f(s(a()),c()) f(c(),c()) -> f(a(),a()) f(s(X),c()) -> f(X,c()) Signature: {f/2} / {a/0,b/0,c/0,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f}/{a,b,c,s} Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor Proof: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).