*** 1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: f(s(X),Y) -> h(s(f(h(Y),X))) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/2} / {h/1,s/1} Obligation: Full basic terms: {f}/{h,s} Applied Processor: ToInnermost Proof: switch to innermost, as the system is overlay and right linear and does not contain weak rules *** 1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: f(s(X),Y) -> h(s(f(h(Y),X))) Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/2} / {h/1,s/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f}/{h,s} Applied Processor: DependencyPairs {dpKind_ = DT} Proof: We add the following dependency tuples: Strict DPs f#(s(X),Y) -> c_1(f#(h(Y),X)) Weak DPs and mark the set of starting terms. *** 1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: f#(s(X),Y) -> c_1(f#(h(Y),X)) Strict TRS Rules: Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: f(s(X),Y) -> h(s(f(h(Y),X))) Signature: {f/2,f#/2} / {h/1,s/1,c_1/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f#}/{h,s} Applied Processor: UsableRules Proof: We replace rewrite rules by usable rules: f#(s(X),Y) -> c_1(f#(h(Y),X)) *** 1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: f#(s(X),Y) -> c_1(f#(h(Y),X)) Strict TRS Rules: Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/2,f#/2} / {h/1,s/1,c_1/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f#}/{h,s} Applied Processor: Trivial Proof: Consider the dependency graph 1:S:f#(s(X),Y) -> c_1(f#(h(Y),X)) The dependency graph contains no loops, we remove all dependency pairs. *** 1.1.1.1.1 Progress [(O(1),O(1))] *** Considered Problem: Strict DP Rules: Strict TRS Rules: Weak DP Rules: Weak TRS Rules: Signature: {f/2,f#/2} / {h/1,s/1,c_1/1} Obligation: Innermost basic terms: {f#}/{h,s} Applied Processor: EmptyProcessor Proof: The problem is already closed. The intended complexity is O(1).