The Runtime Complexity (full) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^2, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(x, 0) → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0, y) → 0
times(x, 0) → 0
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0)) → 0
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(1) RenamingProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Renamed function symbols to avoid clashes with predefined symbol.

(2) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity Relative TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

S is empty.
Rewrite Strategy: FULL

(3) TypeInferenceProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)

Infered types.

(4) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

(5) OrderProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Heuristically decided to analyse the following defined symbols:
plus, times, p, fac

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
plus < times
times < fac
p < fac

(6) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s2_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s2_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s2_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
plus, times, p, fac

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
plus < times
times < fac
p < fac

(7) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)

Induction Base:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(0)) →_R^Ω(1)
gen_0':s2_0(a)

Induction Step:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, 1))) →_R^Ω(1)
s(plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0))) →_IH
s(gen_0':s2_0(+(a, c5_0)))

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(8) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(9) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s2_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s2_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s2_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
times, p, fac

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
times < fac
p < fac

(10) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)

Induction Base:
times(gen_0':s2_0(0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) →_R^Ω(1)
0'

Induction Step:
times(gen_0':s2_0(+(n475_0, 1)), gen_0':s2_0(b)) →_R^Ω(1)
plus(times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)), gen_0':s2_0(b)) →_IH
plus(gen_0':s2_0(*(c476_0, b)), gen_0':s2_0(b)) →_L^{Ω(1 + b)}
gen_0':s2_0(+(b, *(n475_0, b)))

We have rt ∈ Ω(n²) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n²).

(11) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(12) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s2_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s2_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s2_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
p, fac

They will be analysed ascendingly in the following order:
p < fac

(13) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
p(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1092_0))) → gen_0':s2_0(n1092_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1092₀)

Induction Base:
p(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, 0))) →_R^Ω(1)
0'

Induction Step:
p(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, +(n1092_0, 1)))) →_R^Ω(1)
s(p(s(gen_0':s2_0(n1092_0)))) →_IH
s(gen_0':s2_0(c1093_0))

We have rt ∈ Ω(n¹) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n).

(14) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(15) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)
p(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1092_0))) → gen_0':s2_0(n1092_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1092₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s2_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s2_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s2_0(x))

The following defined symbols remain to be analysed:
fac

(16) RewriteLemmaProof (LOWER BOUND(ID) transformation)

Proved the following rewrite lemma:
fac(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1276_0))) → *3_0, rt ∈ Ω(n1276₀ + n1276₀²)

Induction Base:
fac(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, 0)))

Induction Step:
fac(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, +(n1276_0, 1)))) →_R^Ω(1)
times(fac(p(s(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1276_0))))), s(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1276_0)))) →_L^{Ω(2 + n1276₀)}
times(fac(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1276_0))), s(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1276_0)))) →_IH
times(*3_0, s(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1276_0))))

We have rt ∈ Ω(n²) and sz ∈ O(n). Thus, we have irc_R ∈ Ω(n²).

(17) Complex Obligation (BEST)

(18) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)
p(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1092_0))) → gen_0':s2_0(n1092_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1092₀)
fac(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1276_0))) → *3_0, rt ∈ Ω(n1276₀ + n1276₀²)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s2_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s2_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s2_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(19) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n²) was proven with the following lemma:
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)

(20) BOUNDS(n^2, INF)

(21) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)
p(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1092_0))) → gen_0':s2_0(n1092_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1092₀)
fac(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1276_0))) → *3_0, rt ∈ Ω(n1276₀ + n1276₀²)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s2_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s2_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s2_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(22) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n²) was proven with the following lemma:
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)

(23) BOUNDS(n^2, INF)

(24) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)
p(gen_0':s2_0(+(1, n1092_0))) → gen_0':s2_0(n1092_0), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n1092₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s2_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s2_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s2_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(25) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n²) was proven with the following lemma:
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)

(26) BOUNDS(n^2, INF)

(27) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s2_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s2_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s2_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(28) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n²) was proven with the following lemma:
times(gen_0':s2_0(n475_0), gen_0':s2_0(b)) → gen_0':s2_0(*(n475_0, b)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + b·n475₀ + n475₀)

(29) BOUNDS(n^2, INF)

(30) Obligation:

TRS:
Rules:
plus(x, 0') → x
plus(x, s(y)) → s(plus(x, y))
times(0', y) → 0'
times(x, 0') → 0'
times(s(x), y) → plus(times(x, y), y)
p(s(s(x))) → s(p(s(x)))
p(s(0')) → 0'
fac(s(x)) → times(fac(p(s(x))), s(x))

Types:
plus :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
0' :: 0':s
s :: 0':s → 0':s
times :: 0':s → 0':s → 0':s
p :: 0':s → 0':s
fac :: 0':s → 0':s
hole_0':s1_0 :: 0':s
gen_0':s2_0 :: Nat → 0':s

Lemmas:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)

Generator Equations:
gen_0':s2_0(0) ⇔ 0'
gen_0':s2_0(+(x, 1)) ⇔ s(gen_0':s2_0(x))

No more defined symbols left to analyse.

(31) LowerBoundsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The lowerbound Ω(n¹) was proven with the following lemma:
plus(gen_0':s2_0(a), gen_0':s2_0(n4_0)) → gen_0':s2_0(+(n4_0, a)), rt ∈ Ω(1 + n4₀)

(32) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)