(0) Obligation:

Clauses:

rev(LS, RES) :- r1(LS, [], RES).
r1([], RES, RES).
r1(.(X, Xs), Accm, RES) :- r1(Xs, .(X, Accm), RES).

Queries:

rev(g,a).

(1) PrologToPrologProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)

Built Prolog problem from termination graph.

(2) Obligation:

Clauses:

r168([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398)).
r168(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) :- r168(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414).
rev1([], []).
rev1(.(T24, []), .(T24, [])).
rev1(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, []))).
rev1(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, [])))).
rev1(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, []))))).
rev1(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, [])))))).
rev1(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, []))))))).
rev1(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, [])))))))).
rev1(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) :- r168(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367).

Queries:

rev1(g,a).

(3) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND transformation)

We use the technique of [LOPSTR]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
rev1_in: (b,f)
r168_in: (b,b,b,f)
Transforming Prolog into the following Term Rewriting System:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

rev1_in_ga([], []) → rev1_out_ga([], [])
rev1_in_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, [])) → rev1_out_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, []))
rev1_in_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, []))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, [])))
rev1_in_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, [])))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, []))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, []))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, [])))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, [])))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, []))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, []))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, [])))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, [])))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, []))))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) → U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_in_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367))
r168_in_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398)) → r168_out_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398))
r168_in_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_in_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414))
U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_out_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414)) → r168_out_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414)
U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_out_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367)) → rev1_out_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
rev1_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
rev1_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11)  =  U2_ga(x11)
r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3)
r168_out_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_out_ggga(x4)
U1_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U1_ggga(x6)

Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog

(4) Obligation:

Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

rev1_in_ga([], []) → rev1_out_ga([], [])
rev1_in_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, [])) → rev1_out_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, []))
rev1_in_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, []))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, [])))
rev1_in_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, [])))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, []))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, []))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, [])))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, [])))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, []))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, []))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, [])))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, [])))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, []))))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) → U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_in_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367))
r168_in_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398)) → r168_out_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398))
r168_in_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_in_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414))
U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_out_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414)) → r168_out_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414)
U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_out_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367)) → rev1_out_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
rev1_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
rev1_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11)  =  U2_ga(x11)
r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3)
r168_out_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_out_ggga(x4)
U1_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U1_ggga(x6)

(5) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REV1_IN_GA(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) → U2_GA(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_in_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367))
REV1_IN_GA(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) → R168_IN_GGGA(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367)
R168_IN_GGGA(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → U1_GGGA(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_in_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414))
R168_IN_GGGA(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → R168_IN_GGGA(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

rev1_in_ga([], []) → rev1_out_ga([], [])
rev1_in_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, [])) → rev1_out_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, []))
rev1_in_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, []))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, [])))
rev1_in_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, [])))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, []))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, []))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, [])))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, [])))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, []))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, []))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, [])))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, [])))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, []))))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) → U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_in_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367))
r168_in_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398)) → r168_out_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398))
r168_in_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_in_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414))
U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_out_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414)) → r168_out_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414)
U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_out_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367)) → rev1_out_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
rev1_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
rev1_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11)  =  U2_ga(x11)
r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3)
r168_out_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_out_ggga(x4)
U1_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U1_ggga(x6)
REV1_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  REV1_IN_GA(x1)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11)  =  U2_GA(x11)
R168_IN_GGGA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  R168_IN_GGGA(x1, x2, x3)
U1_GGGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U1_GGGA(x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(6) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REV1_IN_GA(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) → U2_GA(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_in_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367))
REV1_IN_GA(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) → R168_IN_GGGA(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367)
R168_IN_GGGA(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → U1_GGGA(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_in_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414))
R168_IN_GGGA(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → R168_IN_GGGA(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

rev1_in_ga([], []) → rev1_out_ga([], [])
rev1_in_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, [])) → rev1_out_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, []))
rev1_in_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, []))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, [])))
rev1_in_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, [])))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, []))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, []))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, [])))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, [])))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, []))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, []))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, [])))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, [])))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, []))))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) → U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_in_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367))
r168_in_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398)) → r168_out_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398))
r168_in_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_in_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414))
U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_out_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414)) → r168_out_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414)
U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_out_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367)) → rev1_out_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
rev1_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
rev1_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11)  =  U2_ga(x11)
r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3)
r168_out_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_out_ggga(x4)
U1_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U1_ggga(x6)
REV1_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  REV1_IN_GA(x1)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11)  =  U2_GA(x11)
R168_IN_GGGA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  R168_IN_GGGA(x1, x2, x3)
U1_GGGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U1_GGGA(x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.

(8) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

R168_IN_GGGA(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → R168_IN_GGGA(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

rev1_in_ga([], []) → rev1_out_ga([], [])
rev1_in_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, [])) → rev1_out_ga(.(T24, []), .(T24, []))
rev1_in_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, []))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T51, .(T50, [])), .(T50, .(T51, [])))
rev1_in_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, [])))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T88, .(T87, .(T86, []))), .(T86, .(T87, .(T88, []))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, []))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T135, .(T134, .(T133, .(T132, [])))), .(T132, .(T133, .(T134, .(T135, [])))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, [])))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T192, .(T191, .(T190, .(T189, .(T188, []))))), .(T188, .(T189, .(T190, .(T191, .(T192, []))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, []))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T259, .(T258, .(T257, .(T256, .(T255, .(T254, [])))))), .(T254, .(T255, .(T256, .(T257, .(T258, .(T259, [])))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, [])))))))) → rev1_out_ga(.(T336, .(T335, .(T334, .(T333, .(T332, .(T331, .(T330, []))))))), .(T330, .(T331, .(T332, .(T333, .(T334, .(T335, .(T336, []))))))))
rev1_in_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367) → U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_in_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367))
r168_in_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398)) → r168_out_ggga([], T397, T398, .(T397, T398))
r168_in_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_in_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414))
U1_ggga(T409, T410, T411, T412, T414, r168_out_ggga(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414)) → r168_out_ggga(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414)
U2_ga(T365, T364, T363, T362, T361, T360, T359, T357, T358, T367, r168_out_ggga(T358, T357, .(T359, .(T360, .(T361, .(T362, .(T363, .(T364, .(T365, []))))))), T367)) → rev1_out_ga(.(T365, .(T364, .(T363, .(T362, .(T361, .(T360, .(T359, .(T357, T358)))))))), T367)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
rev1_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
rev1_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  rev1_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9, x10, x11)  =  U2_ga(x11)
r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_in_ggga(x1, x2, x3)
r168_out_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  r168_out_ggga(x4)
U1_ggga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U1_ggga(x6)
R168_IN_GGGA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  R168_IN_GGGA(x1, x2, x3)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(9) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(10) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

R168_IN_GGGA(.(T409, T410), T411, T412, T414) → R168_IN_GGGA(T410, T409, .(T411, T412), T414)

R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
R168_IN_GGGA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  R168_IN_GGGA(x1, x2, x3)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(11) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

R168_IN_GGGA(.(T409, T410), T411, T412) → R168_IN_GGGA(T410, T409, .(T411, T412))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

  • R168_IN_GGGA(.(T409, T410), T411, T412) → R168_IN_GGGA(T410, T409, .(T411, T412))
    The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 1 > 2

(14) YES