Left Termination of the query pattern mergesort_in_2(g, a) w.r.t. the given Prolog program could successfully be proven:

(0) Obligation:

Clauses:

mergesort([], []).
mergesort(.(E, []), .(E, [])).
mergesort(.(E, .(F, U)), V) :- ','(split(U, L2, L1), ','(mergesort(.(E, L2), X), ','(mergesort(.(F, L1), Z), merge(X, Z, V)))).
merge(X, [], X).
merge([], X, X).
merge(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) :- ','(le(A, B), merge(X, .(B, Y), Z)).
merge(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) :- ','(gt(A, B), merge(.(A, X), Y, Z)).
split([], [], []).
split(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) :- split(U, W, V).
gt(s(X), s(Y)) :- gt(X, Y).
gt(s(X), 0).
le(s(X), s(Y)) :- le(X, Y).
le(0, s(Y)).
le(0, 0).

Queries:

mergesort(g,a).

(1) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND transformation)

We use the technique of [LOPSTR]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
mergesort_in: (b,f)
split_in: (b,f,f)
merge_in: (b,b,f)
le_in: (b,b)
gt_in: (b,b)
Transforming Prolog into the following Term Rewriting System:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)

Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog

(2) Obligation:

Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)

(3) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, L2, L1)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_GAA(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, W, V)
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2), X)
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1), Z)
U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_GA(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, Z, V)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → LE_IN_GG(A, B)
LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_GG(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y), Z)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → GT_IN_GG(A, B)
GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_GG(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y, Z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GA(x1, x2, x5)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1)
U9_GAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_GAA(x1, x5)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GA(x2, x5, x6)
U3_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_GA(x5, x6)
U4_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_GA(x5)
MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3)  =  MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2)
U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U11_GG(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_GG(x3)
U6_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_GGA(x1, x6)
U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U10_GG(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_GG(x3)
U8_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_GGA(x3, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(4) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, L2, L1)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_GAA(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, W, V)
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2), X)
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1), Z)
U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_GA(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, Z, V)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → LE_IN_GG(A, B)
LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_GG(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y), Z)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → GT_IN_GG(A, B)
GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_GG(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y, Z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GA(x1, x2, x5)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1)
U9_GAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_GAA(x1, x5)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GA(x2, x5, x6)
U3_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_GA(x5, x6)
U4_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_GA(x5)
MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3)  =  MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2)
U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U11_GG(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_GG(x3)
U6_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_GGA(x1, x6)
U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U10_GG(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_GG(x3)
U8_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_GGA(x3, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 5 SCCs with 11 less nodes.

(6) Complex Obligation (AND)

(7) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)
GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(9) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)

R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(10) PiDPToQDPProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

(13) TRUE

(14) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)
LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(15) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(16) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)

R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(17) PiDPToQDPProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

(20) TRUE

(21) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y), Z)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y, Z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)
MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3)  =  MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2)
U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(22) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(23) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y), Z)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y, Z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3)  =  MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2)
U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(24) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg
U11_gg(le_out_gg) → le_out_gg
U10_gg(gt_out_gg) → gt_out_gg

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0)
U10_gg(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(.(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(0) = 1   
POL(MERGE_IN_GGA(x₁, x₂)) = x₁   
POL(U10_gg(x₁)) = 0   
POL(U11_gg(x₁)) = 1   
POL(U5_GGA(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = x₂ + x₅   
POL(U7_GGA(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(gt_in_gg(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(gt_out_gg) = 0   
POL(le_in_gg(x₁, x₂)) = x₁   
POL(le_out_gg) = 1   
POL(s(x₁)) = 1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg
U11_gg(le_out_gg) → le_out_gg

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg
U11_gg(le_out_gg) → le_out_gg
U10_gg(gt_out_gg) → gt_out_gg

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0)
U10_gg(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(29) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg
U11_gg(le_out_gg) → le_out_gg
U10_gg(gt_out_gg) → gt_out_gg

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0)
U10_gg(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(30) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(31) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg
U10_gg(gt_out_gg) → gt_out_gg

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0)
U10_gg(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(32) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0)

(33) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg
U10_gg(gt_out_gg) → gt_out_gg

The set Q consists of the following terms:

gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U10_gg(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(34) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y)
  The graph contains the following edges 4 >= 2

• MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 1 > 2, 2 > 3, 2 > 4

(35) TRUE

(36) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, W, V)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(37) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(38) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, W, V)

R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(39) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(40) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U)) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(41) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U)) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U)
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(42) TRUE

(43) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1), Z)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2), X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GA(x1, x2, x5)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GA(x2, x5, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(44) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(45) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1), Z)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2), X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x2, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x3, x6)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GA(x1, x2, x5)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GA(x2, x5, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(46) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(47) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U1_GA(E, F, split_out_gaa(L2, L1)) → U2_GA(F, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2)))
U2_GA(F, L1, mergesort_out_ga(X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1))
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U))) → U1_GA(E, F, split_in_gaa(U))
U1_GA(E, F, split_out_gaa(L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga(.(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U))) → U1_ga(E, F, split_in_gaa(U))
split_in_gaa([]) → split_out_gaa([], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U)) → U9_gaa(E, split_in_gaa(U))
U1_ga(E, F, split_out_gaa(L2, L1)) → U2_ga(F, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2)))
U9_gaa(E, split_out_gaa(W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, V), W)
U2_ga(F, L1, mergesort_out_ga(X)) → U3_ga(X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1)))
U3_ga(X, mergesort_out_ga(Z)) → U4_ga(merge_in_gga(X, Z))
U4_ga(merge_out_gga(V)) → mergesort_out_ga(V)
merge_in_gga(X, []) → merge_out_gga(X)
merge_in_gga([], X) → merge_out_gga(X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg) → U6_gga(A, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y)))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg) → U8_gga(B, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg
U6_gga(A, merge_out_gga(Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, Z))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg
U8_gga(B, merge_out_gga(Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(B, Z))
U11_gg(le_out_gg) → le_out_gg
U10_gg(gt_out_gg) → gt_out_gg

The set Q consists of the following terms:

mergesort_in_ga(x0)
split_in_gaa(x0)
U1_ga(x0, x1, x2)
U9_gaa(x0, x1)
U2_ga(x0, x1, x2)
U3_ga(x0, x1)
U4_ga(x0)
merge_in_gga(x0, x1)
U5_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U7_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
le_in_gg(x0, x1)
U6_gga(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U8_gga(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0)
U10_gg(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(48) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U))) → U1_GA(E, F, split_in_gaa(U))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(.(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂   
POL(0) = 1   
POL(MERGESORT_IN_GA(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(U10_gg(x₁)) = 0   
POL(U11_gg(x₁)) = 1 + x₁   
POL(U1_GA(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₃   
POL(U1_ga(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0   
POL(U2_GA(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂   
POL(U2_ga(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0   
POL(U3_ga(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(U4_ga(x₁)) = 0   
POL(U5_gga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0   
POL(U6_gga(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(U7_gga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0   
POL(U8_gga(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(U9_gaa(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂   
POL([]) = 0   
POL(gt_in_gg(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(gt_out_gg) = 0   
POL(le_in_gg(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(le_out_gg) = 1   
POL(merge_in_gga(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(merge_out_gga(x₁)) = 0   
POL(mergesort_in_ga(x₁)) = 0   
POL(mergesort_out_ga(x₁)) = 0   
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁   
POL(split_in_gaa(x₁)) = 1 + x₁   
POL(split_out_gaa(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

split_in_gaa([]) → split_out_gaa([], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U)) → U9_gaa(E, split_in_gaa(U))
U9_gaa(E, split_out_gaa(W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, V), W)

(49) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U1_GA(E, F, split_out_gaa(L2, L1)) → U2_GA(F, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2)))
U2_GA(F, L1, mergesort_out_ga(X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1))
U1_GA(E, F, split_out_gaa(L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga(.(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U))) → U1_ga(E, F, split_in_gaa(U))
split_in_gaa([]) → split_out_gaa([], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U)) → U9_gaa(E, split_in_gaa(U))
U1_ga(E, F, split_out_gaa(L2, L1)) → U2_ga(F, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2)))
U9_gaa(E, split_out_gaa(W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, V), W)
U2_ga(F, L1, mergesort_out_ga(X)) → U3_ga(X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1)))
U3_ga(X, mergesort_out_ga(Z)) → U4_ga(merge_in_gga(X, Z))
U4_ga(merge_out_gga(V)) → mergesort_out_ga(V)
merge_in_gga(X, []) → merge_out_gga(X)
merge_in_gga([], X) → merge_out_gga(X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg) → U6_gga(A, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y)))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg) → U8_gga(B, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg
U6_gga(A, merge_out_gga(Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, Z))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg
U8_gga(B, merge_out_gga(Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(B, Z))
U11_gg(le_out_gg) → le_out_gg
U10_gg(gt_out_gg) → gt_out_gg

The set Q consists of the following terms:

mergesort_in_ga(x0)
split_in_gaa(x0)
U1_ga(x0, x1, x2)
U9_gaa(x0, x1)
U2_ga(x0, x1, x2)
U3_ga(x0, x1)
U4_ga(x0)
merge_in_gga(x0, x1)
U5_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U7_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
le_in_gg(x0, x1)
U6_gga(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U8_gga(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0)
U10_gg(x0)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(50) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(51) TRUE

(52) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND transformation)

We use the technique of [LOPSTR]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
mergesort_in: (b,f)
split_in: (b,f,f)
merge_in: (b,b,f)
le_in: (b,b)
gt_in: (b,b)
Transforming Prolog into the following Term Rewriting System:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)

Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog

(53) Obligation:

Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)

(54) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, L2, L1)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_GAA(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, W, V)
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2), X)
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1), Z)
U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_GA(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, Z, V)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → LE_IN_GG(A, B)
LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_GG(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y), Z)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → GT_IN_GG(A, B)
GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_GG(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y, Z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1)
U9_GAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_GAA(x1, x2, x5)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5)
MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3)  =  MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2)
U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U11_GG(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_GG(x1, x2, x3)
U6_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U10_GG(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_GG(x1, x2, x3)
U8_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(55) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, L2, L1)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_GAA(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, W, V)
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2), X)
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1), Z)
U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_GA(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
U3_GA(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, Z, V)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → LE_IN_GG(A, B)
LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_GG(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y), Z)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → GT_IN_GG(A, B)
GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_GG(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y, Z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1)
U9_GAA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_GAA(x1, x2, x5)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5)
MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3)  =  MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2)
U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U11_GG(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_GG(x1, x2, x3)
U6_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)
U10_GG(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_GG(x1, x2, x3)
U8_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(56) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 5 SCCs with 11 less nodes.

(57) Complex Obligation (AND)

(58) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  GT_IN_GG(x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(59) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(60) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)

R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(61) PiDPToQDPProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(62) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(63) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• GT_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → GT_IN_GG(X, Y)
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

(64) TRUE

(65) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)  =  LE_IN_GG(x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(66) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(67) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)

R is empty.
Pi is empty.
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(68) PiDPToQDPProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(69) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(70) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• LE_IN_GG(s(X), s(Y)) → LE_IN_GG(X, Y)
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

(71) TRUE

(72) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y), Z)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y, Z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3)  =  MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2)
U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(73) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(74) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y), Z)
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y, Z)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2, x3)  =  MERGE_IN_GGA(x1, x2)
U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_GGA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(75) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(76) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0, x1, x2)
U10_gg(x0, x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(77) MRRProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), Y)

Strictly oriented rules of the TRS R:

gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(.(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂   
POL(0) = 2   
POL(MERGE_IN_GGA(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + 2·x₂   
POL(U10_gg(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 2·x₁ + 2·x₂ + x₃   
POL(U11_gg(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃   
POL(U5_GGA(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = x₁ + 2·x₂ + 2·x₃ + 2·x₄ + 2·x₅   
POL(U7_GGA(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 2·x₁ + 2·x₂ + 2·x₃ + 2·x₄ + x₅   
POL(gt_in_gg(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + 2·x₂   
POL(gt_out_gg(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + 2·x₁ + x₂   
POL(le_in_gg(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(le_out_gg(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂   
POL(s(x₁)) = 2·x₁   

(78) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_GGA(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0, x1, x2)
U10_gg(x0, x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(79) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(80) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0, x1, x2)
U10_gg(x0, x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(81) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

(82) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0, x1, x2)
U10_gg(x0, x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(83) QReductionProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U10_gg(x0, x1, x2)

(84) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

le_in_gg(x0, x1)
U11_gg(x0, x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(85) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg(A, B)) → MERGE_IN_GGA(X, .(B, Y))
  The graph contains the following edges 2 >= 1

• MERGE_IN_GGA(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_GGA(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 1 > 2, 2 > 3, 2 > 4

(86) TRUE

(87) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, W, V)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(88) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(89) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U, W, V)

R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  SPLIT_IN_GAA(x1)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(90) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(91) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U)) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(92) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

• SPLIT_IN_GAA(.(E, U)) → SPLIT_IN_GAA(U)
  The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1

(93) TRUE

(94) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1), Z)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2), X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga([], []) → mergesort_out_ga([], [])
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(95) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.

(96) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U2_GA(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1), Z)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
U1_GA(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2), X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga(.(E, []), .(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V) → U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_in_gaa(U, L2, L1))
split_in_gaa([], [], []) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W) → U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_in_gaa(U, W, V))
U1_ga(E, F, U, V, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2), X))
U9_gaa(E, U, V, W, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U2_ga(E, F, U, V, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1), Z))
U3_ga(E, F, U, V, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_in_gga(X, Z, V))
U4_ga(E, F, U, V, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)
merge_in_gga(X, [], X) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X, X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_in_gg(A, B))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, Z, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mergesort_in_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_in_ga(x1)
[]  =  []
mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)  =  mergesort_out_ga(x1, x2)
.(x1, x2)  =  .(x1, x2)
U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
split_in_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_in_gaa(x1)
split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  split_out_gaa(x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U9_gaa(x1, x2, x5)
U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U3_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)
U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U4_ga(x1, x2, x3, x5)
merge_in_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_in_gga(x1, x2)
merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)  =  merge_out_gga(x1, x2, x3)
U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U5_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
le_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_in_gg(x1, x2)
s(x1)  =  s(x1)
U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U11_gg(x1, x2, x3)
0  =  0
le_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  le_out_gg(x1, x2)
U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U6_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U7_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
gt_in_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_in_gg(x1, x2)
U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)  =  U10_gg(x1, x2, x3)
gt_out_gg(x1, x2)  =  gt_out_gg(x1, x2)
U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U8_gga(x1, x2, x3, x4, x6)
MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1, x2)  =  MERGESORT_IN_GA(x1)
U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5)  =  U1_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5)
U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6)  =  U2_GA(x1, x2, x3, x5, x6)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(97) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)

Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.

(98) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U1_GA(E, F, U, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2)))
U2_GA(E, F, U, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1))
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U))) → U1_GA(E, F, U, split_in_gaa(U))
U1_GA(E, F, U, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga(.(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U))) → U1_ga(E, F, U, split_in_gaa(U))
split_in_gaa([]) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U)) → U9_gaa(E, U, split_in_gaa(U))
U1_ga(E, F, U, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2)))
U9_gaa(E, U, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U2_ga(E, F, U, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1)))
U3_ga(E, F, U, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, merge_in_gga(X, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)
merge_in_gga(X, []) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y)))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

mergesort_in_ga(x0)
split_in_gaa(x0)
U1_ga(x0, x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x0, x1, x2)
U2_ga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U3_ga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U4_ga(x0, x1, x2, x3)
merge_in_gga(x0, x1)
U5_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U7_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
le_in_gg(x0, x1)
U6_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U8_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U11_gg(x0, x1, x2)
U10_gg(x0, x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

(99) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U1_GA(E, F, U, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_GA(E, F, U, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2)))
U1_GA(E, F, U, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, L2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(.(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(MERGESORT_IN_GA(x₁)) = x₁   
POL(U10_gg(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0   
POL(U11_gg(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0   
POL(U1_GA(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 1 + x₄   
POL(U1_ga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 0   
POL(U2_GA(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 1 + x₄   
POL(U2_ga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0   
POL(U3_ga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0   
POL(U4_ga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄)) = 0   
POL(U5_gga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0   
POL(U6_gga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0   
POL(U7_gga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0   
POL(U8_gga(x₁, x₂, x₃, x₄, x₅)) = 0   
POL(U9_gaa(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₃   
POL([]) = 0   
POL(gt_in_gg(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(gt_out_gg(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(le_in_gg(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(le_out_gg(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(merge_in_gga(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(merge_out_gga(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0   
POL(mergesort_in_ga(x₁)) = 0   
POL(mergesort_out_ga(x₁, x₂)) = 0   
POL(s(x₁)) = 0   
POL(split_in_gaa(x₁)) = 1 + x₁   
POL(split_out_gaa(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

split_in_gaa([]) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U)) → U9_gaa(E, U, split_in_gaa(U))
U9_gaa(E, U, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)

(100) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U2_GA(E, F, U, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(F, L1))
MERGESORT_IN_GA(.(E, .(F, U))) → U1_GA(E, F, U, split_in_gaa(U))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

mergesort_in_ga(.(E, [])) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, []), .(E, []))
mergesort_in_ga(.(E, .(F, U))) → U1_ga(E, F, U, split_in_gaa(U))
split_in_gaa([]) → split_out_gaa([], [], [])
split_in_gaa(.(E, U)) → U9_gaa(E, U, split_in_gaa(U))
U1_ga(E, F, U, split_out_gaa(U, L2, L1)) → U2_ga(E, F, U, L1, mergesort_in_ga(.(E, L2)))
U9_gaa(E, U, split_out_gaa(U, W, V)) → split_out_gaa(.(E, U), .(E, V), W)
U2_ga(E, F, U, L1, mergesort_out_ga(.(E, L2), X)) → U3_ga(E, F, U, X, mergesort_in_ga(.(F, L1)))
U3_ga(E, F, U, X, mergesort_out_ga(.(F, L1), Z)) → U4_ga(E, F, U, merge_in_gga(X, Z))
U4_ga(E, F, U, merge_out_gga(X, Z, V)) → mergesort_out_ga(.(E, .(F, U)), V)
merge_in_gga(X, []) → merge_out_gga(X, [], X)
merge_in_gga([], X) → merge_out_gga([], X, X)
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, le_in_gg(A, B))
merge_in_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y)) → U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, gt_in_gg(A, B))
U5_gga(A, X, B, Y, le_out_gg(A, B)) → U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, merge_in_gga(X, .(B, Y)))
U7_gga(A, X, B, Y, gt_out_gg(A, B)) → U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, merge_in_gga(.(A, X), Y))
le_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U11_gg(X, Y, le_in_gg(X, Y))
le_in_gg(0, s(Y)) → le_out_gg(0, s(Y))
le_in_gg(0, 0) → le_out_gg(0, 0)
U6_gga(A, X, B, Y, merge_out_gga(X, .(B, Y), Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(A, Z))
gt_in_gg(s(X), s(Y)) → U10_gg(X, Y, gt_in_gg(X, Y))
gt_in_gg(s(X), 0) → gt_out_gg(s(X), 0)
U8_gga(A, X, B, Y, merge_out_gga(.(A, X), Y, Z)) → merge_out_gga(.(A, X), .(B, Y), .(B, Z))
U11_gg(X, Y, le_out_gg(X, Y)) → le_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))
U10_gg(X, Y, gt_out_gg(X, Y)) → gt_out_gg(s(X), s(Y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

mergesort_in_ga(x0)
split_in_gaa(x0)
U1_ga(x0, x1, x2, x3)
U9_gaa(x0, x1, x2)
U2_ga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U3_ga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U4_ga(x0, x1, x2, x3)
merge_in_gga(x0, x1)
U5_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U7_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
le_in_gg(x0, x1)
U6_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
gt_in_gg(x0, x1)
U8_gga(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
U11_gg(x0, x1, x2)
U10_gg(x0, x1, x2)

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.