(0) Obligation:

Clauses:

p(.(A, [])) :- l(.(A, [])).
r(1).
l([]).
l(.(H, T)) :- ','(r(H), l(T)).

Queries:

p(a).

(1) PrologToPrologProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)

Built Prolog problem from termination graph.

(2) Obligation:

Clauses:

p1(.(1, [])).

Queries:

p1(a).

(3) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND transformation)

We use the technique of [LOPSTR]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
Transforming Prolog into the following Term Rewriting System:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p1_in_a(.(1, [])) → p1_out_a(.(1, []))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_a(x1)  =  p1_in_a
p1_out_a(x1)  =  p1_out_a(x1)

Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog

(4) Obligation:

Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p1_in_a(.(1, [])) → p1_out_a(.(1, []))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_a(x1)  =  p1_in_a
p1_out_a(x1)  =  p1_out_a(x1)

(5) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p1_in_a(.(1, [])) → p1_out_a(.(1, []))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_a(x1)  =  p1_in_a
p1_out_a(x1)  =  p1_out_a(x1)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(6) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p1_in_a(.(1, [])) → p1_out_a(.(1, []))

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_a(x1)  =  p1_in_a
p1_out_a(x1)  =  p1_out_a(x1)

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,R,Pi) chain.

(8) YES