(0) Obligation:
Clauses:
app(.(X, Xs), Ys, .(X, Zs)) :- app(Xs, Ys, Zs).
app([], Ys, Ys).
reverse(.(X, Xs), Ys) :- ','(reverse(Xs, Zs), app(Zs, .(X, []), Ys)).
reverse([], []).
Queries:
reverse(g,a).
(1) PrologToDTProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)
Built DT problem from termination graph.
(2) Obligation:
Triples:
reverse10(.(T33, T34), X69) :- reverse10(T34, X68).
reverse10(.(T33, T34), X69) :- ','(reversec10(T34, T37), app18(T37, T33, X69)).
app18(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) :- app18(T56, T57, X112).
app31(.(T91, T92), T93, .(T91, T95)) :- app31(T92, T93, T95).
reverse1(.(T6, .(T18, T19)), T9) :- reverse10(T19, X32).
reverse1(.(T6, .(T18, T19)), T9) :- ','(reversec10(T19, T22), app18(T22, T18, X33)).
reverse1(.(T6, .(T18, T19)), T9) :- ','(reversec10(T19, T22), ','(appc18(T22, T18, T67), app31(T67, T6, T9))).
Clauses:
reversec10(.(T33, T34), X69) :- ','(reversec10(T34, T37), appc18(T37, T33, X69)).
reversec10([], []).
appc18(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) :- appc18(T56, T57, X112).
appc18([], T63, .(T63, [])).
appc31(.(T91, T92), T93, .(T91, T95)) :- appc31(T92, T93, T95).
appc31([], T102, .(T102, [])).
Afs:
reverse1(x1, x2) = reverse1(x1)
(3) TriplesToPiDPProof (SOUND transformation)
We use the technique of [LOPSTR]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
reverse1_in: (b,f)
reverse10_in: (b,f)
reversec10_in: (b,f)
appc18_in: (b,b,f)
app18_in: (b,b,f)
app31_in: (b,b,f)
Transforming
TRIPLES into the following
Term Rewriting System:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
REVERSE1_IN_GA(.(T6, .(T18, T19)), T9) → U6_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reverse10_in_ga(T19, X32))
REVERSE1_IN_GA(.(T6, .(T18, T19)), T9) → REVERSE10_IN_GA(T19, X32)
REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34), X69) → U1_GA(T33, T34, X69, reverse10_in_ga(T34, X68))
REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34), X69) → REVERSE10_IN_GA(T34, X68)
REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34), X69) → U2_GA(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_in_ga(T34, T37))
U2_GA(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_out_ga(T34, T37)) → U3_GA(T33, T34, X69, app18_in_gga(T37, T33, X69))
U2_GA(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_out_ga(T34, T37)) → APP18_IN_GGA(T37, T33, X69)
APP18_IN_GGA(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → U4_GGA(T55, T56, T57, X112, app18_in_gga(T56, T57, X112))
APP18_IN_GGA(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → APP18_IN_GGA(T56, T57, X112)
REVERSE1_IN_GA(.(T6, .(T18, T19)), T9) → U7_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reversec10_in_ga(T19, T22))
U7_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reversec10_out_ga(T19, T22)) → U8_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, app18_in_gga(T22, T18, X33))
U7_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reversec10_out_ga(T19, T22)) → APP18_IN_GGA(T22, T18, X33)
U7_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reversec10_out_ga(T19, T22)) → U9_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, appc18_in_gga(T22, T18, T67))
U9_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, appc18_out_gga(T22, T18, T67)) → U10_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, app31_in_gga(T67, T6, T9))
U9_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, appc18_out_gga(T22, T18, T67)) → APP31_IN_GGA(T67, T6, T9)
APP31_IN_GGA(.(T91, T92), T93, .(T91, T95)) → U5_GGA(T91, T92, T93, T95, app31_in_gga(T92, T93, T95))
APP31_IN_GGA(.(T91, T92), T93, .(T91, T95)) → APP31_IN_GGA(T92, T93, T95)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
reversec10_in_ga(.(T33, T34), X69) → U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_in_ga(T34, T37))
reversec10_in_ga([], []) → reversec10_out_ga([], [])
U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_out_ga(T34, T37)) → U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_in_gga(T37, T33, X69))
appc18_in_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_in_gga(T56, T57, X112))
appc18_in_gga([], T63, .(T63, [])) → appc18_out_gga([], T63, .(T63, []))
U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_out_gga(T56, T57, X112)) → appc18_out_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112))
U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_out_gga(T37, T33, X69)) → reversec10_out_ga(.(T33, T34), X69)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
reverse10_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reverse10_in_ga(
x1)
reversec10_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_in_ga(
x1)
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
[] =
[]
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
app18_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
app18_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
app31_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
app31_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
REVERSE1_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
REVERSE1_IN_GA(
x1)
U6_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U6_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
REVERSE10_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
REVERSE10_IN_GA(
x1)
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x4)
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x4)
U3_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U3_GA(
x1,
x2,
x4)
APP18_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
APP18_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
U4_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U4_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U7_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U7_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U8_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U8_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U9_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U9_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U10_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U10_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
APP31_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
APP31_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
U5_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U5_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiDP implies Termination of TRIPLES
(4) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
REVERSE1_IN_GA(.(T6, .(T18, T19)), T9) → U6_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reverse10_in_ga(T19, X32))
REVERSE1_IN_GA(.(T6, .(T18, T19)), T9) → REVERSE10_IN_GA(T19, X32)
REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34), X69) → U1_GA(T33, T34, X69, reverse10_in_ga(T34, X68))
REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34), X69) → REVERSE10_IN_GA(T34, X68)
REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34), X69) → U2_GA(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_in_ga(T34, T37))
U2_GA(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_out_ga(T34, T37)) → U3_GA(T33, T34, X69, app18_in_gga(T37, T33, X69))
U2_GA(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_out_ga(T34, T37)) → APP18_IN_GGA(T37, T33, X69)
APP18_IN_GGA(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → U4_GGA(T55, T56, T57, X112, app18_in_gga(T56, T57, X112))
APP18_IN_GGA(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → APP18_IN_GGA(T56, T57, X112)
REVERSE1_IN_GA(.(T6, .(T18, T19)), T9) → U7_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reversec10_in_ga(T19, T22))
U7_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reversec10_out_ga(T19, T22)) → U8_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, app18_in_gga(T22, T18, X33))
U7_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reversec10_out_ga(T19, T22)) → APP18_IN_GGA(T22, T18, X33)
U7_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, reversec10_out_ga(T19, T22)) → U9_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, appc18_in_gga(T22, T18, T67))
U9_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, appc18_out_gga(T22, T18, T67)) → U10_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, app31_in_gga(T67, T6, T9))
U9_GA(T6, T18, T19, T9, appc18_out_gga(T22, T18, T67)) → APP31_IN_GGA(T67, T6, T9)
APP31_IN_GGA(.(T91, T92), T93, .(T91, T95)) → U5_GGA(T91, T92, T93, T95, app31_in_gga(T92, T93, T95))
APP31_IN_GGA(.(T91, T92), T93, .(T91, T95)) → APP31_IN_GGA(T92, T93, T95)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
reversec10_in_ga(.(T33, T34), X69) → U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_in_ga(T34, T37))
reversec10_in_ga([], []) → reversec10_out_ga([], [])
U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_out_ga(T34, T37)) → U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_in_gga(T37, T33, X69))
appc18_in_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_in_gga(T56, T57, X112))
appc18_in_gga([], T63, .(T63, [])) → appc18_out_gga([], T63, .(T63, []))
U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_out_gga(T56, T57, X112)) → appc18_out_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112))
U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_out_gga(T37, T33, X69)) → reversec10_out_ga(.(T33, T34), X69)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
reverse10_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reverse10_in_ga(
x1)
reversec10_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_in_ga(
x1)
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
[] =
[]
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
app18_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
app18_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
app31_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
app31_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
REVERSE1_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
REVERSE1_IN_GA(
x1)
U6_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U6_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
REVERSE10_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
REVERSE10_IN_GA(
x1)
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x4)
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U2_GA(
x1,
x2,
x4)
U3_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U3_GA(
x1,
x2,
x4)
APP18_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
APP18_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
U4_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U4_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U7_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U7_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U8_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U8_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U9_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U9_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
U10_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U10_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
APP31_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
APP31_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
U5_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U5_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 3 SCCs with 14 less nodes.
(6) Complex Obligation (AND)
(7) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
APP31_IN_GGA(.(T91, T92), T93, .(T91, T95)) → APP31_IN_GGA(T92, T93, T95)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
reversec10_in_ga(.(T33, T34), X69) → U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_in_ga(T34, T37))
reversec10_in_ga([], []) → reversec10_out_ga([], [])
U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_out_ga(T34, T37)) → U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_in_gga(T37, T33, X69))
appc18_in_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_in_gga(T56, T57, X112))
appc18_in_gga([], T63, .(T63, [])) → appc18_out_gga([], T63, .(T63, []))
U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_out_gga(T56, T57, X112)) → appc18_out_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112))
U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_out_gga(T37, T33, X69)) → reversec10_out_ga(.(T33, T34), X69)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
reversec10_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_in_ga(
x1)
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
[] =
[]
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
APP31_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
APP31_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(8) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.
(9) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
APP31_IN_GGA(.(T91, T92), T93, .(T91, T95)) → APP31_IN_GGA(T92, T93, T95)
R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
APP31_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
APP31_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(10) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.
(11) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
APP31_IN_GGA(.(T91, T92), T93) → APP31_IN_GGA(T92, T93)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(12) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- APP31_IN_GGA(.(T91, T92), T93) → APP31_IN_GGA(T92, T93)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
(13) YES
(14) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
APP18_IN_GGA(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → APP18_IN_GGA(T56, T57, X112)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
reversec10_in_ga(.(T33, T34), X69) → U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_in_ga(T34, T37))
reversec10_in_ga([], []) → reversec10_out_ga([], [])
U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_out_ga(T34, T37)) → U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_in_gga(T37, T33, X69))
appc18_in_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_in_gga(T56, T57, X112))
appc18_in_gga([], T63, .(T63, [])) → appc18_out_gga([], T63, .(T63, []))
U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_out_gga(T56, T57, X112)) → appc18_out_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112))
U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_out_gga(T37, T33, X69)) → reversec10_out_ga(.(T33, T34), X69)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
reversec10_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_in_ga(
x1)
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
[] =
[]
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
APP18_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
APP18_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(15) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.
(16) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
APP18_IN_GGA(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → APP18_IN_GGA(T56, T57, X112)
R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
APP18_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
APP18_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(17) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.
(18) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
APP18_IN_GGA(.(T55, T56), T57) → APP18_IN_GGA(T56, T57)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(19) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- APP18_IN_GGA(.(T55, T56), T57) → APP18_IN_GGA(T56, T57)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
(20) YES
(21) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34), X69) → REVERSE10_IN_GA(T34, X68)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
reversec10_in_ga(.(T33, T34), X69) → U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_in_ga(T34, T37))
reversec10_in_ga([], []) → reversec10_out_ga([], [])
U12_ga(T33, T34, X69, reversec10_out_ga(T34, T37)) → U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_in_gga(T37, T33, X69))
appc18_in_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112)) → U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_in_gga(T56, T57, X112))
appc18_in_gga([], T63, .(T63, [])) → appc18_out_gga([], T63, .(T63, []))
U14_gga(T55, T56, T57, X112, appc18_out_gga(T56, T57, X112)) → appc18_out_gga(.(T55, T56), T57, .(T55, X112))
U13_ga(T33, T34, X69, appc18_out_gga(T37, T33, X69)) → reversec10_out_ga(.(T33, T34), X69)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
reversec10_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_in_ga(
x1)
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U12_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
[] =
[]
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2) =
reversec10_out_ga(
x1,
x2)
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U13_ga(
x1,
x2,
x4)
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U14_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
appc18_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
REVERSE10_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
REVERSE10_IN_GA(
x1)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(22) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.
(23) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34), X69) → REVERSE10_IN_GA(T34, X68)
R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
REVERSE10_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
REVERSE10_IN_GA(
x1)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(24) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.
(25) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34)) → REVERSE10_IN_GA(T34)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(26) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- REVERSE10_IN_GA(.(T33, T34)) → REVERSE10_IN_GA(T34)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
(27) YES