(0) Obligation:
Clauses:
select(X1, [], X2) :- ','(!, failure(a)).
select(X, Y, Zs) :- ','(head(Y, X), tail(Y, Zs)).
select(X, Y, .(H, Zs)) :- ','(head(Y, H), ','(tail(Y, T), select(X, T, Zs))).
head([], X3).
head(.(H, X4), H).
tail([], []).
tail(.(X5, T), T).
failure(b).
Queries:
select(g,g,a).
(1) PrologToPrologProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)
Built Prolog problem from termination graph.
(2) Obligation:
Clauses:
select1(T12, .(T12, T13), T13).
select1(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) :- select1(T14, T24, T22).
Queries:
select1(g,g,a).
(3) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND transformation)
We use the technique of [LOPSTR]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
select1_in: (b,b,f)
Transforming
Prolog into the following
Term Rewriting System:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
select1_in_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13) → select1_out_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13)
select1_in_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_in_gga(T14, T24, T22))
U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_out_gga(T14, T24, T22)) → select1_out_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22))
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog
(4) Obligation:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
select1_in_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13) → select1_out_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13)
select1_in_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_in_gga(T14, T24, T22))
U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_out_gga(T14, T24, T22)) → select1_out_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22))
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
(5) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → U1_GGA(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_in_gga(T14, T24, T22))
SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, T24, T22)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
select1_in_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13) → select1_out_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13)
select1_in_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_in_gga(T14, T24, T22))
U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_out_gga(T14, T24, T22)) → select1_out_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22))
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
SELECT1_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
SELECT1_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
U1_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(6) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → U1_GGA(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_in_gga(T14, T24, T22))
SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, T24, T22)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
select1_in_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13) → select1_out_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13)
select1_in_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_in_gga(T14, T24, T22))
U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_out_gga(T14, T24, T22)) → select1_out_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22))
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
SELECT1_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
SELECT1_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
U1_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
(8) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, T24, T22)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
select1_in_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13) → select1_out_gga(T12, .(T12, T13), T13)
select1_in_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_in_gga(T14, T24, T22))
U1_gga(T14, T23, T24, T22, select1_out_gga(T14, T24, T22)) → select1_out_gga(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22))
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_in_gga(
x1,
x2)
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
select1_out_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3)
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4,
x5) =
U1_gga(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x5)
SELECT1_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
SELECT1_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(9) UsableRulesProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
For (infinitary) constructor rewriting [LOPSTR] we can delete all non-usable rules from R.
(10) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, .(T23, T24), .(T23, T22)) → SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, T24, T22)
R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
SELECT1_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
SELECT1_IN_GGA(
x1,
x2)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(11) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.
(12) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, .(T23, T24)) → SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, T24)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(13) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, .(T23, T24)) → SELECT1_IN_GGA(T14, T24)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2
(14) TRUE