(0) Obligation:
Clauses:
f(X) :- ','(p(X), q(X)).
p(a) :- !.
p(X) :- p(Y).
q(b).
Queries:
f(a).
(1) PrologToPrologProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)
Built Prolog problem from termination graph.
(2) Obligation:
Clauses:
p4(a).
p4(T5).
f1(T3) :- p4(T3).
f1(b) :- p4(b).
Queries:
f1(a).
(3) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND transformation)
We use the technique of [LOPSTR]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
f1_in: (f)
Transforming
Prolog into the following
Term Rewriting System:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f1_in_a(T3) → U1_a(T3, p4_in_a(T3))
p4_in_a(a) → p4_out_a(a)
p4_in_a(T5) → p4_out_a(T5)
U1_a(T3, p4_out_a(T3)) → f1_out_a(T3)
f1_in_a(b) → U2_a(p4_in_g(b))
p4_in_g(a) → p4_out_g(a)
p4_in_g(T5) → p4_out_g(T5)
U2_a(p4_out_g(b)) → f1_out_a(b)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
f1_in_a(
x1) =
f1_in_a
U1_a(
x1,
x2) =
U1_a(
x2)
p4_in_a(
x1) =
p4_in_a
p4_out_a(
x1) =
p4_out_a
f1_out_a(
x1) =
f1_out_a
U2_a(
x1) =
U2_a(
x1)
p4_in_g(
x1) =
p4_in_g(
x1)
a =
a
p4_out_g(
x1) =
p4_out_g
b =
b
Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog
(4) Obligation:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f1_in_a(T3) → U1_a(T3, p4_in_a(T3))
p4_in_a(a) → p4_out_a(a)
p4_in_a(T5) → p4_out_a(T5)
U1_a(T3, p4_out_a(T3)) → f1_out_a(T3)
f1_in_a(b) → U2_a(p4_in_g(b))
p4_in_g(a) → p4_out_g(a)
p4_in_g(T5) → p4_out_g(T5)
U2_a(p4_out_g(b)) → f1_out_a(b)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
f1_in_a(
x1) =
f1_in_a
U1_a(
x1,
x2) =
U1_a(
x2)
p4_in_a(
x1) =
p4_in_a
p4_out_a(
x1) =
p4_out_a
f1_out_a(
x1) =
f1_out_a
U2_a(
x1) =
U2_a(
x1)
p4_in_g(
x1) =
p4_in_g(
x1)
a =
a
p4_out_g(
x1) =
p4_out_g
b =
b
(5) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F1_IN_A(T3) → U1_A(T3, p4_in_a(T3))
F1_IN_A(T3) → P4_IN_A(T3)
F1_IN_A(b) → U2_A(p4_in_g(b))
F1_IN_A(b) → P4_IN_G(b)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f1_in_a(T3) → U1_a(T3, p4_in_a(T3))
p4_in_a(a) → p4_out_a(a)
p4_in_a(T5) → p4_out_a(T5)
U1_a(T3, p4_out_a(T3)) → f1_out_a(T3)
f1_in_a(b) → U2_a(p4_in_g(b))
p4_in_g(a) → p4_out_g(a)
p4_in_g(T5) → p4_out_g(T5)
U2_a(p4_out_g(b)) → f1_out_a(b)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
f1_in_a(
x1) =
f1_in_a
U1_a(
x1,
x2) =
U1_a(
x2)
p4_in_a(
x1) =
p4_in_a
p4_out_a(
x1) =
p4_out_a
f1_out_a(
x1) =
f1_out_a
U2_a(
x1) =
U2_a(
x1)
p4_in_g(
x1) =
p4_in_g(
x1)
a =
a
p4_out_g(
x1) =
p4_out_g
b =
b
F1_IN_A(
x1) =
F1_IN_A
U1_A(
x1,
x2) =
U1_A(
x2)
P4_IN_A(
x1) =
P4_IN_A
U2_A(
x1) =
U2_A(
x1)
P4_IN_G(
x1) =
P4_IN_G(
x1)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(6) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F1_IN_A(T3) → U1_A(T3, p4_in_a(T3))
F1_IN_A(T3) → P4_IN_A(T3)
F1_IN_A(b) → U2_A(p4_in_g(b))
F1_IN_A(b) → P4_IN_G(b)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f1_in_a(T3) → U1_a(T3, p4_in_a(T3))
p4_in_a(a) → p4_out_a(a)
p4_in_a(T5) → p4_out_a(T5)
U1_a(T3, p4_out_a(T3)) → f1_out_a(T3)
f1_in_a(b) → U2_a(p4_in_g(b))
p4_in_g(a) → p4_out_g(a)
p4_in_g(T5) → p4_out_g(T5)
U2_a(p4_out_g(b)) → f1_out_a(b)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
f1_in_a(
x1) =
f1_in_a
U1_a(
x1,
x2) =
U1_a(
x2)
p4_in_a(
x1) =
p4_in_a
p4_out_a(
x1) =
p4_out_a
f1_out_a(
x1) =
f1_out_a
U2_a(
x1) =
U2_a(
x1)
p4_in_g(
x1) =
p4_in_g(
x1)
a =
a
p4_out_g(
x1) =
p4_out_g
b =
b
F1_IN_A(
x1) =
F1_IN_A
U1_A(
x1,
x2) =
U1_A(
x2)
P4_IN_A(
x1) =
P4_IN_A
U2_A(
x1) =
U2_A(
x1)
P4_IN_G(
x1) =
P4_IN_G(
x1)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 0 SCCs with 4 less nodes.
(8) TRUE