(0) Obligation:

Clauses:

p(X, Y, Z) :- ','(=(X, Y), ','(=(Z, 1), !)).
p(X, Y, Z) :- ','(=(Z, 1), ','(=(Y, X), p(X, Y, Z))).
=(X, X).

Queries:

p(a,a,a).

(1) PrologToPrologProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)

Built Prolog problem from termination graph.

(2) Obligation:

Clauses:

p6(T26, T26, 1).
p1(T10, T10, 1).
p1(T1, T2, T3) :- p6(T1, T2, T3).
p1(T26, T26, 1).

Queries:

p1(a,a,a).

(3) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND transformation)

We use the technique of [LOPSTR]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
p1_in: (f,f,f)
Transforming Prolog into the following Term Rewriting System:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p1_in_aaa(T10, T10, 1) → p1_out_aaa(T10, T10, 1)
p1_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3) → U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
p6_in_aaa(T26, T26, 1) → p6_out_aaa(T26, T26, 1)
U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)) → p1_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p1_in_aaa
p1_out_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p1_out_aaa(x3)
U1_aaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  U1_aaa(x4)
p6_in_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p6_in_aaa
p6_out_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p6_out_aaa(x3)

Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog

(4) Obligation:

Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p1_in_aaa(T10, T10, 1) → p1_out_aaa(T10, T10, 1)
p1_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3) → U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
p6_in_aaa(T26, T26, 1) → p6_out_aaa(T26, T26, 1)
U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)) → p1_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p1_in_aaa
p1_out_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p1_out_aaa(x3)
U1_aaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  U1_aaa(x4)
p6_in_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p6_in_aaa
p6_out_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p6_out_aaa(x3)

(5) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

P1_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3) → U1_AAA(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
P1_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3) → P6_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p1_in_aaa(T10, T10, 1) → p1_out_aaa(T10, T10, 1)
p1_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3) → U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
p6_in_aaa(T26, T26, 1) → p6_out_aaa(T26, T26, 1)
U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)) → p1_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p1_in_aaa
p1_out_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p1_out_aaa(x3)
U1_aaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  U1_aaa(x4)
p6_in_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p6_in_aaa
p6_out_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p6_out_aaa(x3)
P1_IN_AAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  P1_IN_AAA
U1_AAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  U1_AAA(x4)
P6_IN_AAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  P6_IN_AAA

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(6) Obligation:

Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

P1_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3) → U1_AAA(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
P1_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3) → P6_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

p1_in_aaa(T10, T10, 1) → p1_out_aaa(T10, T10, 1)
p1_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3) → U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
p6_in_aaa(T26, T26, 1) → p6_out_aaa(T26, T26, 1)
U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)) → p1_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)

The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p1_in_aaa
p1_out_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p1_out_aaa(x3)
U1_aaa(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  U1_aaa(x4)
p6_in_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p6_in_aaa
p6_out_aaa(x1, x2, x3)  =  p6_out_aaa(x3)
P1_IN_AAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  P1_IN_AAA
U1_AAA(x1, x2, x3, x4)  =  U1_AAA(x4)
P6_IN_AAA(x1, x2, x3)  =  P6_IN_AAA

We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(8) TRUE