(0) Obligation:
Clauses:
p(X, Y, Z) :- ','(=(X, Y), ','(=(Z, 1), !)).
p(X, Y, Z) :- ','(=(Z, 1), ','(=(Y, X), p(X, Y, Z))).
=(X, X).
Queries:
p(a,a,a).
(1) PrologToPrologProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)
Built Prolog problem from termination graph.
(2) Obligation:
Clauses:
p6(T26, T26, 1).
p1(T10, T10, 1).
p1(T1, T2, T3) :- p6(T1, T2, T3).
p1(T26, T26, 1).
Queries:
p1(a,a,a).
(3) PrologToPiTRSProof (SOUND transformation)
We use the technique of [LOPSTR]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
p1_in: (f,f,f)
Transforming
Prolog into the following
Term Rewriting System:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
p1_in_aaa(T10, T10, 1) → p1_out_aaa(T10, T10, 1)
p1_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3) → U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
p6_in_aaa(T26, T26, 1) → p6_out_aaa(T26, T26, 1)
U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)) → p1_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p1_in_aaa
p1_out_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p1_out_aaa(
x3)
U1_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U1_aaa(
x4)
p6_in_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p6_in_aaa
p6_out_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p6_out_aaa(
x3)
Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiTRS implies Termination of Prolog
(4) Obligation:
Pi-finite rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
p1_in_aaa(T10, T10, 1) → p1_out_aaa(T10, T10, 1)
p1_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3) → U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
p6_in_aaa(T26, T26, 1) → p6_out_aaa(T26, T26, 1)
U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)) → p1_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p1_in_aaa
p1_out_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p1_out_aaa(
x3)
U1_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U1_aaa(
x4)
p6_in_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p6_in_aaa
p6_out_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p6_out_aaa(
x3)
(5) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LOPSTR] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
P1_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3) → U1_AAA(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
P1_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3) → P6_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
p1_in_aaa(T10, T10, 1) → p1_out_aaa(T10, T10, 1)
p1_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3) → U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
p6_in_aaa(T26, T26, 1) → p6_out_aaa(T26, T26, 1)
U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)) → p1_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p1_in_aaa
p1_out_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p1_out_aaa(
x3)
U1_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U1_aaa(
x4)
p6_in_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p6_in_aaa
p6_out_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p6_out_aaa(
x3)
P1_IN_AAA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
P1_IN_AAA
U1_AAA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U1_AAA(
x4)
P6_IN_AAA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
P6_IN_AAA
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(6) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
P1_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3) → U1_AAA(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
P1_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3) → P6_IN_AAA(T1, T2, T3)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
p1_in_aaa(T10, T10, 1) → p1_out_aaa(T10, T10, 1)
p1_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3) → U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_in_aaa(T1, T2, T3))
p6_in_aaa(T26, T26, 1) → p6_out_aaa(T26, T26, 1)
U1_aaa(T1, T2, T3, p6_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)) → p1_out_aaa(T1, T2, T3)
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
p1_in_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p1_in_aaa
p1_out_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p1_out_aaa(
x3)
U1_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U1_aaa(
x4)
p6_in_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p6_in_aaa
p6_out_aaa(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
p6_out_aaa(
x3)
P1_IN_AAA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
P1_IN_AAA
U1_AAA(
x1,
x2,
x3,
x4) =
U1_AAA(
x4)
P6_IN_AAA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
P6_IN_AAA
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.
(8) TRUE