(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(a, f(x, a)), a) → f(a, f(f(x, a), a))

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(f(a, f(x, a)), a) → F(a, f(f(x, a), a))
F(f(a, f(x, a)), a) → F(f(x, a), a)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(a, f(x, a)), a) → f(a, f(f(x, a), a))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(f(a, f(x, a)), a) → F(f(x, a), a)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(a, f(x, a)), a) → f(a, f(f(x, a), a))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


F(f(a, f(x, a)), a) → F(f(x, a), a)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(x0, x1, x2)  =  F(x0, x1, x2)

Tags:
F has argument tags [0,0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(F(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(a) = 0   
POL(f(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(a, f(x, a)), a) → f(a, f(f(x, a), a))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(8) TRUE