(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(f(a, a), a)) → f(f(a, f(a, a)), x)
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, f(f(a, a), a)) → F(f(a, f(a, a)), x)
F(x, f(f(a, a), a)) → F(a, f(a, a))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(f(a, a), a)) → f(f(a, f(a, a)), x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
F(x, f(f(a, a), a)) → F(f(a, f(a, a)), x)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(f(a, a), a)) → f(f(a, f(a, a)), x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
F(x, f(f(a, a), a)) → F(f(a, f(a, a)), x)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
F(
x0,
x1,
x2) =
F(
x0,
x2)
Tags:
F has argument tags [2,2,2] and root tag 0
Comparison: MS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
F(
x1,
x2) =
x1
f(
x1,
x2) =
f(
x1,
x2)
a =
a
Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:
[f2, a]
Status:
f2: [1,2]
a: multiset
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(6) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
f(x, f(f(a, a), a)) → f(f(a, f(a, a)), x)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(7) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(8) TRUE