(0) Obligation:
Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
+(*(x, y), *(x, z)) → *(x, +(y, z))
+(+(x, y), z) → +(x, +(y, z))
+(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
Q is empty.
(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.
(2) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
+1(*(x, y), *(x, z)) → +1(y, z)
+1(+(x, y), z) → +1(x, +(y, z))
+1(+(x, y), z) → +1(y, z)
+1(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +1(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
+1(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +1(y, z)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
+(*(x, y), *(x, z)) → *(x, +(y, z))
+(+(x, y), z) → +(x, +(y, z))
+(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
(4) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
+1(+(x, y), z) → +1(x, +(y, z))
+1(*(x, y), *(x, z)) → +1(y, z)
+1(+(x, y), z) → +1(y, z)
+1(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +1(y, z)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
+(*(x, y), *(x, z)) → *(x, +(y, z))
+(+(x, y), z) → +(x, +(y, z))
+(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
+1(*(x, y), *(x, z)) → +1(y, z)
+1(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +1(y, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
+1(
x0,
x1,
x2) =
+1(
x1)
Tags:
+1 has argument tags [3,0,1] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(*(x1, x2)) = 1 + x2
POL(+(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(+1(x1, x2)) = 1
POL(u) = 1
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(6) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
+1(+(x, y), z) → +1(x, +(y, z))
+1(+(x, y), z) → +1(y, z)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
+(*(x, y), *(x, z)) → *(x, +(y, z))
+(+(x, y), z) → +(x, +(y, z))
+(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
+1(+(x, y), z) → +1(x, +(y, z))
+1(+(x, y), z) → +1(y, z)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
+1(
x0,
x1,
x2) =
+1(
x0,
x1)
Tags:
+1 has argument tags [0,0,0] and root tag 0
Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:
POL(*(x1, x2)) = 0
POL(+(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2
POL(+1(x1, x2)) = 0
POL(u) = 0
The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:
none
(8) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
+(*(x, y), *(x, z)) → *(x, +(y, z))
+(+(x, y), z) → +(x, +(y, z))
+(*(x, y), +(*(x, z), u)) → +(*(x, +(y, z)), u)
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
(9) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
(10) TRUE