Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmp7Ocx2M/PEANO_nosorts_noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳11 QDP

        ↳12 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳13 QDP

        ↳14 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳15 TRUE

    ↳16 QDP

        ↳17 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳18 QDP

        ↳19 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳20 QDP

        ↳21 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳22 TRUE

    ↳23 QDP

        ↳24 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳25 QDP

        ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳27 QDP

        ↳28 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳29 QDP

        ↳30 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳31 QDP

        ↳32 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳33 QDP

        ↳34 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳35 TRUE

    ↳36 QDP

        ↳37 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳38 QDP

        ↳39 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳40 QDP

        ↳41 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳42 QDP

        ↳43 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳44 QDP

        ↳45 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳46 QDP

        ↳47 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳48 TRUE

    ↳49 QDP

        ↳50 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳51 QDP

        ↳52 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳53 QDP

        ↳54 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳55 QDP

        ↳56 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳57 QDP

        ↳58 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳59 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → U12¹(tt, M, N)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U11¹(tt, M, N)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 5 SCCs with 10 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x0)

Tags:
PLUS has argument tags [0,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = x1
mark(x1) = x1
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x0, x1, x2)

Tags:
PLUS has argument tags [1,2,2] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = PLUS(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = x1
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[PLUS₂, active₁]

Status:

PLUS₂: [1,2]
active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x2)

Tags:
PLUS has argument tags [2,1,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = PLUS(x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[PLUS₁, mark₁]

Status:

PLUS₁: multiset
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x0, x1)

Tags:
PLUS has argument tags [0,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = PLUS
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

mark₁ > PLUS

Status:

PLUS: multiset
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(13) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(14) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(15) TRUE

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(active(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
S(x0, x1) = S(x1)

Tags:
S has argument tags [1,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S
active(x1) = active(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

S: multiset
active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
S(x0, x1) = S(x1)

Tags:
S has argument tags [1,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[S, mark₁]

Status:

S: multiset
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(22) TRUE

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x3)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [2,0,0,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12¹(x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x1, x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U12^1₂: multiset
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x0, x3)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [3,1,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12¹(x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x2, x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U12^1₂: multiset
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x1)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [2,3,3,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12¹(x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U12^1₂: multiset
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(29) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(30) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x0, x2)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [1,0,1,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12¹(x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x1, x2)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

active₁ > U12^1₂

Status:

U12^1₂: [1,2]
active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(31) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(32) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x3)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [3,1,0,2] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12¹(x1, x2, x3) = U12¹
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U12^1: []
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(33) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(34) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(35) TRUE

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x3)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [2,0,0,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x1, x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U11^1₂: multiset
mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(38) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(39) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x0, x3)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [3,1,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x2, x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U11^1₂: multiset
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(40) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(41) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x1)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [2,3,3,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U11^1₂: multiset
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(42) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(43) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x0, x2)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [1,0,1,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x1, x2)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

active₁ > U11^1₂

Status:

U11^1₂: [1,2]
active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(44) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(45) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x3)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [3,1,0,2] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2, x3) = U11¹
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U11^1: []
active₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(46) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(47) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(48) TRUE

(49) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(50) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x0, x1)
ACTIVE(x0, x1) = ACTIVE(x0, x1)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [2,0] and root tag 0
ACTIVE has argument tags [2,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK
U11(x1, x2, x3) = U11(x1, x2, x3)
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE
mark(x1) = x1
tt = tt
U12(x1, x2, x3) = U12(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1) = s(x1)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
0 = 0
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[MARK, U11₃, ACTIVE, U12₃, plus₂] > s₁ > tt
0 > tt

Status:

MARK: multiset
U11₃: multiset
ACTIVE: multiset
tt: multiset
U12₃: multiset
s₁: [1]
plus₂: multiset
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(51) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(52) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x0, x1)
ACTIVE(x0, x1) = ACTIVE(x0)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [1,2] and root tag 0
ACTIVE has argument tags [2,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = x1
U11(x1, x2, x3) = U11
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE
mark(x1) = mark
tt = tt
U12(x1, x2, x3) = U12
s(x1) = s(x1)
plus(x1, x2) = plus
active(x1) = active
0 = 0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[mark, active] > [U11, ACTIVE, tt, U12, s₁, plus]
[mark, active] > 0

Status:

U11: multiset
ACTIVE: multiset
mark: multiset
tt: multiset
U12: multiset
s₁: multiset
plus: multiset
active: []
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(53) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(54) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x0)
ACTIVE(x0, x1) = ACTIVE(x0)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [0,3] and root tag 0
ACTIVE has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = x1
U11(x1, x2, x3) = U11
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE
mark(x1) = mark
tt = tt
U12(x1, x2, x3) = U12
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x2)
active(x1) = active(x1)
s(x1) = s
0 = 0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

tt > plus₁ > mark > active₁ > [U11, ACTIVE, U12]
tt > plus₁ > mark > 0
tt > s > mark > active₁ > [U11, ACTIVE, U12]
tt > s > mark > 0

Status:

U11: []
ACTIVE: []
mark: []
tt: multiset
U12: []
plus₁: multiset
active₁: multiset
s: []
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(55) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(56) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x0, x1)
ACTIVE(x0, x1) = ACTIVE(x0, x1)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [2,1] and root tag 0
ACTIVE has argument tags [2,2] and root tag 1

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
U11(x1, x2, x3) = U11(x1)
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE
mark(x1) = x1
tt = tt
U12(x1, x2, x3) = x1
active(x1) = x1
s(x1) = s
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
0 = 0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[tt, s] > [MARK₁, U11₁, ACTIVE, plus₂]

Status:

MARK₁: [1]
U11₁: [1]
ACTIVE: []
tt: multiset
s: multiset
plus₂: [2,1]
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)

(57) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(58) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) Obligation:

(12) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(13) Obligation:

(14) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(15) TRUE

(16) Obligation:

(17) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(18) Obligation:

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(20) Obligation:

(21) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(22) TRUE

(23) Obligation:

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(25) Obligation:

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) Obligation:

(28) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(29) Obligation:

(30) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(31) Obligation:

(32) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(33) Obligation:

(34) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(35) TRUE

(36) Obligation:

(37) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(38) Obligation:

(39) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(40) Obligation:

(41) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(42) Obligation:

(43) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(44) Obligation:

(45) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(46) Obligation:

(47) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(48) TRUE

(49) Obligation:

(50) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(51) Obligation:

(52) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(53) Obligation:

(54) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(55) Obligation:

(56) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(57) Obligation:

(58) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(59) TRUE