Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmp_CveQL/PEANO_nosorts_noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳11 TRUE

    ↳12 QDP

        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳14 QDP

        ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳16 QDP

        ↳17 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳18 TRUE

    ↳19 QDP

        ↳20 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳21 QDP

        ↳22 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳23 QDP

        ↳24 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳25 QDP

        ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳27 QDP

        ↳28 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳29 TRUE

    ↳30 QDP

        ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳32 QDP

        ↳33 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳34 QDP

        ↳35 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳36 QDP

        ↳37 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳38 QDP

        ↳39 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳40 TRUE

    ↳41 QDP

        ↳42 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳43 QDP

        ↳44 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳45 QDP

        ↳46 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳47 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → U12¹(tt, M, N)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → S(plus(N, M))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → PLUS(N, M)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → U11¹(tt, M, N)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 5 SCCs with 10 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(X1, mark(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(mark(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x0, x1)

Tags:
PLUS has argument tags [2,2,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = x2
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

mark₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(active(X1), X2) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(X1, active(X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x1, x2)

Tags:
PLUS has argument tags [3,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: DMS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = x2
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(active(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
S(x0, x1) = S(x0, x1)

Tags:
S has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S
active(x1) = active(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

active₁ > S

Status:

S: multiset
active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
S(x0, x1) = S(x0, x1)

Tags:
S has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[S, mark₁]

Status:

S: multiset
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(18) TRUE

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [0,1,2,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12¹(x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x1, x2, x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U12^1₃: [3,2,1]
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x0, x2)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [0,1,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12¹(x1, x2, x3) = x2
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)
U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x0)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [0,3,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12¹(x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x3)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[U12^1₁, active₁]

Status:

U12^1₁: [1]
active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x1, x2)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [1,0,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12¹(x1, x2, x3) = U12¹(x2, x3)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

active₁ > U12^1₂

Status:

U12^1₂: multiset
active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(29) TRUE

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [0,1,2,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x1, x2, x3)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U11^1₃: [3,2,1]
mark₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x0, x2)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [0,1,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2, x3) = x2
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)
U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x0)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [0,3,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x3)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[U11^1₁, active₁]

Status:

U11^1₁: [1]
active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(36) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(37) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U11¹(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11¹(X1, X2, X3)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x1, x2)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [1,0,0,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MS
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x2, x3)
active(x1) = active(x1)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

active₁ > U11^1₂

Status:

U11^1₂: multiset
active₁: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(38) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(39) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(40) TRUE

(41) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, M, N)) → MARK(s(plus(N, M)))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(plus(N, 0)) → MARK(N)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(plus(N, s(M))) → MARK(U11(tt, M, N))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x0, x1)
ACTIVE(x0, x1) = ACTIVE(x1)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [2,1] and root tag 1
ACTIVE has argument tags [3,2] and root tag 1

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = x1
U11(x1, x2, x3) = U11(x1, x2, x3)
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE
mark(x1) = x1
tt = tt
U12(x1, x2, x3) = U12(x1, x2, x3)
s(x1) = s(x1)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
0 = 0
active(x1) = x1

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

ACTIVE > [U11₃, tt, U12₃, plus₂] > s₁

Status:

U11₃: [3,2,1]
ACTIVE: multiset
tt: multiset
U12₃: [3,2,1]
s₁: [1]
plus₂: [1,2]
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)

(43) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(44) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, M, N)) → MARK(U12(tt, M, N))
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x0, x1)
ACTIVE(x0, x1) = ACTIVE(x1)

Tags:
MARK has argument tags [0,2] and root tag 1
ACTIVE has argument tags [3,2] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = x1
U11(x1, x2, x3) = U11(x2, x3)
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
tt = tt
U12(x1, x2, x3) = x2
s(x1) = s
plus(x1, x2) = plus
active(x1) = x1
0 = 0

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

U11₂ > [ACTIVE₁, s] > mark₁
tt > [ACTIVE₁, s] > mark₁
tt > plus > mark₁
0 > mark₁

Status:

U11₂: [1,2]
ACTIVE₁: multiset
mark₁: [1]
tt: multiset
s: []
plus: multiset
0: multiset

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

(45) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(U11(tt, M, N)) → mark(U12(tt, M, N))
active(U12(tt, M, N)) → mark(s(plus(N, M)))
active(plus(N, 0)) → mark(N)
active(plus(N, s(M))) → mark(U11(tt, M, N))
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2, X3))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → active(plus(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(0) → active(0)
U11(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(active(X1), X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, active(X2), X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U11(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
U12(mark(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, mark(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, mark(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(active(X1), X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, active(X2), X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
U12(X1, X2, active(X3)) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
plus(mark(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, mark(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(active(X1), X2) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(X1, active(X2)) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(46) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) Obligation:

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) Obligation:

(17) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(18) TRUE

(19) Obligation:

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(21) Obligation:

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(23) Obligation:

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(25) Obligation:

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) Obligation:

(28) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(29) TRUE

(30) Obligation:

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(32) Obligation:

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(34) Obligation:

(35) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(36) Obligation:

(37) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(38) Obligation:

(39) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(40) TRUE

(41) Obligation:

(42) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(43) Obligation:

(44) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(45) Obligation:

(46) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(47) TRUE