Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS
↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)
↳2 QDP
↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
↳4 AND
    ↳5 QDP
        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳7 QDP
        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳9 QDP
        ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
        ↳11 TRUE
    ↳12 QDP
        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
        ↳14 QDP
        ↳15 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
        ↳16 AND
            ↳17 QDP
                ↳18 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
                ↳19 QDP
                ↳20 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
                ↳21 TRUE
            ↳22 QDP
                ↳23 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
                ↳24 QDP
                ↳25 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
                ↳26 QDP
                ↳27 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
                ↳28 QDP
                ↳29 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)
                ↳30 QDP
                ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔)
                ↳32 QDP
                ↳33 PisEmptyProof (⇔)
                ↳34 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, V2) → A__U12(a__isNat(V2))
A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__ISNAT(N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__U21(a__isNat(V1))
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__ISNAT(N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__ISNAT(M)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → A__U11(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X)) → A__U12(mark(X))
MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(isNat(X)) → A__ISNAT(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → A__U21(mark(X))
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 9 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__U11(x1, x2)  =  A__U11(x2)
A__ISNAT(x1)  =  A__ISNAT(x1)

Tags:
A__U11 has tags [3,0]
A__ISNAT has tags [0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1   
POL(U12(x1)) = x1   
POL(U21(x1)) = x1   
POL(a__U11(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(a__U12(x1)) = 1   
POL(a__U21(x1)) = 1   
POL(a__isNat(x1)) = 0   
POL(isNat(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(s(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(tt) = 1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__U11(x1, x2)  =  A__U11(x2)
A__ISNAT(x1)  =  A__ISNAT(x1)

Tags:
A__U11 has tags [1,1]
A__ISNAT has tags [0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1   
POL(U12(x1)) = x1   
POL(U21(x1)) = x1   
POL(a__U11(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(a__U12(x1)) = x1   
POL(a__U21(x1)) = 0   
POL(a__isNat(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(isNat(x1)) = 1   
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(tt) = 1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)
A__U31(x1, x2)  =  A__U31(x2)
A__U41(x1, x2, x3)  =  A__U41(x2, x3)
A__U42(x1, x2, x3)  =  A__U42(x2, x3)
A__PLUS(x1, x2)  =  A__PLUS(x1, x2)

Tags:
MARK has tags [1]
A__U31 has tags [14,1]
A__U41 has tags [1,10,10]
A__U42 has tags [13,9,10]
A__PLUS has tags [10,5]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(U12(x1)) = x1   
POL(U21(x1)) = x1   
POL(U31(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(U41(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x1 + x2 + x3   
POL(U42(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x1 + x2 + x3   
POL(a__U11(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(a__U12(x1)) = x1   
POL(a__U21(x1)) = x1   
POL(a__U31(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(a__U41(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x1 + x2 + x3   
POL(a__U42(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x1 + x2 + x3   
POL(a__isNat(x1)) = 1   
POL(a__plus(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(isNat(x1)) = 1   
POL(mark(x1)) = x1   
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(s(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(tt) = 1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs.

(16) Complex Obligation (AND)

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__U42(x1, x2, x3)  =  A__U42(x2)
A__PLUS(x1, x2)  =  A__PLUS(x2)
A__U41(x1, x2, x3)  =  A__U41(x1, x2)

Tags:
A__U42 has tags [1,1,0]
A__PLUS has tags [2,1]
A__U41 has tags [7,6,7]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(U12(x1)) = 0   
POL(U21(x1)) = 0   
POL(U31(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(U41(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x2 + x3   
POL(U42(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x2 + x3   
POL(a__U11(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(a__U12(x1)) = 0   
POL(a__U21(x1)) = 0   
POL(a__U31(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(a__U41(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x2 + x3   
POL(a__U42(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x2 + x3   
POL(a__isNat(x1)) = 0   
POL(a__plus(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(isNat(x1)) = 0   
POL(mark(x1)) = x1   
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(s(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(tt) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(21) TRUE

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)
A__U31(x1, x2)  =  A__U31(x2)

Tags:
MARK has tags [1]
A__U31 has tags [2,1]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(U12(x1)) = x1   
POL(U21(x1)) = x1   
POL(U31(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(U41(x1, x2, x3)) = x3   
POL(U42(x1, x2, x3)) = 0   
POL(a__U11(x1, x2)) = x1   
POL(a__U12(x1)) = 0   
POL(a__U21(x1)) = 1   
POL(a__U31(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(a__U41(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x1 + x2 + x3   
POL(a__U42(x1, x2, x3)) = x2   
POL(a__isNat(x1)) = 0   
POL(a__plus(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1   
POL(isNat(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(tt) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(24) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(25) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)
A__U31(x1, x2)  =  A__U31(x2)

Tags:
MARK has tags [0]
A__U31 has tags [1,0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 1   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(U12(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(U21(x1)) = x1   
POL(U31(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(U41(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x2 + x3   
POL(U42(x1, x2, x3)) = 1   
POL(a__U11(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(a__U12(x1)) = 1   
POL(a__U21(x1)) = 0   
POL(a__U31(x1, x2)) = 1 + x2   
POL(a__U41(x1, x2, x3)) = x1 + x2   
POL(a__U42(x1, x2, x3)) = x3   
POL(a__isNat(x1)) = 0   
POL(a__plus(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(isNat(x1)) = 1 + x1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(tt) = 1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(26) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(27) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)
A__U31(x1, x2)  =  A__U31(x2)

Tags:
MARK has tags [0]
A__U31 has tags [2,0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2   
POL(U12(x1)) = x1   
POL(U21(x1)) = x1   
POL(U31(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1 + x2   
POL(U41(x1, x2, x3)) = 1 + x3   
POL(U42(x1, x2, x3)) = 1   
POL(a__U11(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(a__U12(x1)) = 0   
POL(a__U21(x1)) = 1   
POL(a__U31(x1, x2)) = x2   
POL(a__U41(x1, x2, x3)) = x2   
POL(a__U42(x1, x2, x3)) = x2   
POL(a__isNat(x1)) = 1   
POL(a__plus(x1, x2)) = 1   
POL(isNat(x1)) = 0   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(plus(x1, x2)) = 1   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(tt) = 0   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(28) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(29) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1)  =  MARK(x1)

Tags:
MARK has tags [0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(U21(x1)) = 1 + x1   

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(34) TRUE