Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpz5mtSS/PEANO_nokinds_noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳11 TRUE

    ↳12 QDP

        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳14 QDP

        ↳15 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳16 AND

            ↳17 QDP

                ↳18 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

                ↳19 QDP

                ↳20 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

                ↳21 QDP

                ↳22 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

                ↳23 QDP

                ↳24 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

                ↳25 TRUE

            ↳26 QDP

                ↳27 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

                ↳28 QDP

                ↳29 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

                ↳30 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, V2) → A__U12(a__isNat(V2))
A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__ISNAT(N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__U21(a__isNat(V1))
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__ISNAT(N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__ISNAT(M)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → A__U11(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X)) → A__U12(mark(X))
MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(isNat(X)) → A__ISNAT(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → A__U21(mark(X))
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 9 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__U11(tt, V2) → A__ISNAT(V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__U11(x1, x2) = A__U11(x2)
A__ISNAT(x1) = A__ISNAT(x1)

Tags:
A__U11 has tags [3,3]
A__ISNAT has tags [0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
tt = tt
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
a__isNat(x1) = a__isNat
s(x1) = x1
0 = 0
a__U11(x1, x2) = x2
a__U21(x1) = x1
isNat(x1) = isNat
a__U12(x1) = x1
U11(x1, x2) = U11(x1, x2)
U21(x1) = U21(x1)
U12(x1) = U12(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[a_{_isNat}, isNat] > [tt, 0]

Status:

tt: []
plus₂: [2,1]
a_{_isNat}: []
0: []
isNat: []
U11₂: [2,1]
U21₁: [1]
U12₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__ISNAT(x1) = A__ISNAT(x1)

Tags:
A__ISNAT has tags [0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

s₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → A__U31(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U31(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
MARK(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
A__U31(x1, x2) = A__U31(x2)
A__U41(x1, x2, x3) = A__U41(x2, x3)
A__U42(x1, x2, x3) = A__U42(x2, x3)
A__PLUS(x1, x2) = A__PLUS(x1, x2)

Tags:
MARK has tags [0]
A__U31 has tags [15,0]
A__U41 has tags [13,8,0]
A__U42 has tags [15,8,0]
A__PLUS has tags [0,3]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11(x1, x2) = x1
U12(x1) = x1
U21(x1) = x1
U31(x1, x2) = U31(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = x1
tt = tt
U41(x1, x2, x3) = U41(x1, x2, x3)
a__isNat(x1) = a__isNat
0 = 0
s(x1) = s(x1)
U42(x1, x2, x3) = U42(x1, x2, x3)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
a__U11(x1, x2) = x1
a__U12(x1) = x1
isNat(x1) = isNat
a__U21(x1) = x1
a__U31(x1, x2) = a__U31(x1, x2)
a__plus(x1, x2) = a__plus(x1, x2)
a__U41(x1, x2, x3) = a__U41(x1, x2, x3)
a__U42(x1, x2, x3) = a__U42(x1, x2, x3)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[U31₂, U41₃, U42₃, plus₂, a_{_U31₂}, a_{_plus₂}, a_{_U41₃}, a_{_U42₃}] > [tt, a_{_isNat}, 0, isNat] > s₁

Status:

U31₂: [2,1]
tt: []
U41₃: [3,2,1]
a_{_isNat}: []
0: []
s₁: [1]
U42₃: [3,2,1]
plus₂: [1,2]
isNat: []
a_{_U31₂}: [2,1]
a_{_plus₂}: [1,2]
a_{_U41₃}: [3,2,1]
a_{_U42₃}: [3,2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)
A__U31(tt, N) → MARK(N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs with 3 less nodes.

(16) Complex Obligation (AND)

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U21(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)

Tags:
MARK has tags [0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12(x1) = x1
U11(x1, x2) = x1
U21(x1) = U21(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U21₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U12(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)

Tags:
MARK has tags [0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U12(x1) = U12(x1)
U11(x1, x2) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U12₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)

Tags:
MARK has tags [0]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11(x1, x2) = U11(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U11₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(25) TRUE

(26) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(27) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__PLUS(x1, x2) = A__PLUS(x2)
A__U41(x1, x2, x3) = A__U41(x1, x2)
A__U42(x1, x2, x3) = A__U42(x1, x2)

Tags:
A__PLUS has tags [1,1]
A__U41 has tags [2,1,3]
A__U42 has tags [0,1,4]

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
s(x1) = s(x1)
a__isNat(x1) = a__isNat
tt = tt
mark(x1) = x1
0 = 0
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
a__U11(x1, x2) = a__U11
a__U21(x1) = a__U21
isNat(x1) = isNat
U11(x1, x2) = U11
U12(x1) = x1
a__U12(x1) = x1
U21(x1) = U21
U31(x1, x2) = x2
a__U31(x1, x2) = x2
a__plus(x1, x2) = a__plus(x1, x2)
U41(x1, x2, x3) = U41(x1, x2, x3)
a__U41(x1, x2, x3) = a__U41(x1, x2, x3)
U42(x1, x2, x3) = U42(x1, x2, x3)
a__U42(x1, x2, x3) = a__U42(x1, x2, x3)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[plus₂, a_{_plus₂}, U41₃, a_{_U41₃}, U42₃, a_{_U42₃}] > [s₁, a_{_isNat}, tt, a_{_U11}, a_{_U21}, isNat, U11, U21]

Status:

s₁: [1]
a_{_isNat}: []
tt: []
0: []
plus₂: [1,2]
a_{_U11}: []
a_{_U21}: []
isNat: []
U11: []
U21: []
a_{_plus₂}: [1,2]
U41₃: [3,2,1]
a_{_U41₃}: [3,2,1]
U42₃: [3,2,1]
a_{_U42₃}: [3,2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)

(28) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U41(tt, M, N) → A__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
A__U42(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, V2) → a__U12(a__isNat(V2))
a__U12(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U41(tt, M, N) → a__U42(a__isNat(N), M, N)
a__U42(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__U11(a__isNat(V1), V2)
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__U21(a__isNat(V1))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U31(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U41(a__isNat(M), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U12(X)) → a__U12(mark(X))
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(U21(X)) → a__U21(mark(X))
mark(U31(X1, X2)) → a__U31(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U41(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U42(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U42(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U12(X) → U12(X)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__U21(X) → U21(X)
a__U31(X1, X2) → U31(X1, X2)
a__U41(X1, X2, X3) → U41(X1, X2, X3)
a__U42(X1, X2, X3) → U42(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(29) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) Obligation:

(15) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) Complex Obligation (AND)

(17) Obligation:

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(19) Obligation:

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(21) Obligation:

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(23) Obligation:

(24) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(25) TRUE

(26) Obligation:

(27) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(28) Obligation:

(29) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(30) TRUE