Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpI9AXQX/PEANO_nokinds

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳6 QDP

↳7 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳8 QDP

↳9 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳10 QDP

↳11 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

↳12 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, N) → activate(N)
U21(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → isNat(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U11(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U21(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNat(X) → n__isNat(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNat(X)) → isNat(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U21¹(tt, M, N) → S(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
U21¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
U21¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U21¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → U11¹(isNat(N), N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNat(N))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
ACTIVATE(n__0) → 0¹
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(n__isNat(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, N) → activate(N)
U21(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → isNat(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U11(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U21(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNat(X) → n__isNat(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNat(X)) → isNat(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U11¹(isNat(N), N)
U11¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
ACTIVATE(n__isNat(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
U21¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNat(N))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U21¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U21¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, N) → activate(N)
U21(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → isNat(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U11(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U21(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNat(X) → n__isNat(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNat(X)) → isNat(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(n__isNat(X)) → ISNAT(X)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U21¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ACTIVATE(x0, x1) = ACTIVATE(x0)
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x1, x2)
U11¹(x0, x1, x2) = U11¹(x0)
ISNAT(x0, x1) = ISNAT(x0, x1)
AND(x0, x1, x2) = AND(x2)
U21¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U21¹(x0, x2)

Tags:
ACTIVATE has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 4
PLUS has argument tags [0,0,29] and root tag 4
U11¹ has argument tags [0,24,27] and root tag 4
ISNAT has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 3
AND has argument tags [0,30,0] and root tag 4
U21¹ has argument tags [0,18,30,8] and root tag 4

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVATE(x1) = x1
n__plus(x1, x2) = n__plus(x1, x2)
PLUS(x1, x2) = PLUS(x2)
0 = 0
U11¹(x1, x2) = x2
isNat(x1) = x1
tt = tt
n__isNat(x1) = x1
ISNAT(x1) = x1
AND(x1, x2) = AND
activate(x1) = x1
n__s(x1) = n__s(x1)
s(x1) = s(x1)
U21¹(x1, x2, x3) = x3
and(x1, x2) = and(x1, x2)
n__0 = n__0
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
U11(x1, x2) = U11(x2)
U21(x1, x2, x3) = U21(x1, x2, x3)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[0, tt, n_₀] > [n_{_plus₂}, PLUS₁, plus₂, U21₃] > [n_{_s₁}, s₁, and₂]
[0, tt, n_₀] > [n_{_plus₂}, PLUS₁, plus₂, U21₃] > U11₁

Status:

n_{_plus₂}: [1,2]
PLUS₁: [1]
0: []
tt: []
AND: []
n_{_s₁}: [1]
s₁: [1]
and₂: [1,2]
n_₀: []
plus₂: [1,2]
U11₁: [1]
U21₃: [3,2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

isNat(n__0) → tt
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(N, 0) → U11(isNat(N), N)
U11(tt, N) → activate(N)
activate(n__isNat(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__s(V1)) → isNat(activate(V1))
isNat(X) → n__isNat(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X
plus(N, s(M)) → U21(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
U21(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(N, 0) → U11¹(isNat(N), N)
U11¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
U21¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNat(N))
U21¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, N) → activate(N)
U21(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → isNat(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U11(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U21(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNat(X) → n__isNat(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNat(X)) → isNat(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(N, s(M)) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
U21¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, N) → activate(N)
U21(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → isNat(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U11(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U21(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNat(X) → n__isNat(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNat(X)) → isNat(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(N, s(M)) → U21¹(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
U21¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x0)
U21¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U21¹(x2)

Tags:
PLUS has argument tags [4,7,6] and root tag 0
U21¹ has argument tags [0,7,4,3] and root tag 1

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PLUS(x1, x2) = x2
s(x1) = s(x1)
U21¹(x1, x2, x3) = x3
and(x1, x2) = x2
isNat(x1) = isNat
n__isNat(x1) = n__isNat
tt = tt
activate(x1) = x1
n__0 = n__0
n__plus(x1, x2) = n__plus(x1, x2)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
0 = 0
U11(x1, x2) = U11(x2)
n__s(x1) = n__s(x1)
U21(x1, x2, x3) = U21(x1, x2, x3)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[n_₀, 0] > U11₁
[n_{_plus₂}, plus₂, U21₃] > [isNat, n_{_isNat}] > [s₁, tt, n_{_s₁}]
[n_{_plus₂}, plus₂, U21₃] > U11₁

Status:

s₁: [1]
isNat: []
n_{_isNat}: []
tt: []
n_₀: []
n_{_plus₂}: [1,2]
plus₂: [1,2]
0: []
U11₁: [1]
n_{_s₁}: [1]
U21₃: [3,2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

isNat(n__0) → tt
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(N, 0) → U11(isNat(N), N)
U11(tt, N) → activate(N)
activate(n__isNat(X)) → isNat(X)
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__s(V1)) → isNat(activate(V1))
isNat(X) → n__isNat(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X
plus(N, s(M)) → U21(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
U21(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, N) → activate(N)
U21(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNat(activate(V1)), n__isNat(activate(V2)))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → isNat(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U11(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U21(and(isNat(M), n__isNat(N)), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNat(X) → n__isNat(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNat(X)) → isNat(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Obligation:

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(8) Obligation:

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(10) Obligation:

(11) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) TRUE