Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmphfuv2k/PEANO_nokinds

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳6 QDP

↳7 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳8 QDP

↳9 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

↳10 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__isNat(V1)
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, N) → MARK(N)
A__U21(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__U21(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
A__U21(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
A__AND(tt, X) → MARK(X)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__ISNAT(N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__AND(a__isNat(M), isNat(N))
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__ISNAT(M)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → A__U11(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isNat(X)) → A__ISNAT(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__isNat(V1)
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__U11(tt, N) → MARK(N)
A__U21(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
A__U21(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
A__AND(tt, X) → MARK(X)
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
A__ISNAT(plus(V1, V2)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__ISNAT(s(V1)) → A__ISNAT(V1)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → A__ISNAT(N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__AND(a__isNat(M), isNat(N))
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__ISNAT(M)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → A__U11(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__U11(x0, x1, x2) = A__U11(x2)
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x0)
A__U21(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__U21(x0, x2)
A__PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = A__PLUS(x0, x1, x2)
A__AND(x0, x1, x2) = A__AND(x0, x2)
A__ISNAT(x0, x1) = A__ISNAT(x0)

Tags:
A__U11 has argument tags [2,29,12] and root tag 6
MARK has argument tags [12,16] and root tag 0
A__U21 has argument tags [17,12,16,10] and root tag 1
A__PLUS has argument tags [17,17,16] and root tag 1
A__AND has argument tags [24,13,12] and root tag 6
A__ISNAT has argument tags [12,30] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
A__U11(x1, x2) = A__U11
tt = tt
MARK(x1) = x1
A__U21(x1, x2, x3) = x3
A__PLUS(x1, x2) = x1
mark(x1) = x1
A__AND(x1, x2) = A__AND(x1)
A__ISNAT(x1) = x1
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
a__isNat(x1) = x1
isNat(x1) = x1
s(x1) = s(x1)
0 = 0
a__and(x1, x2) = a__and(x1, x2)
U11(x1, x2) = U11(x1, x2)
U21(x1, x2, x3) = U21(x1, x2, x3)
and(x1, x2) = and(x1, x2)
a__U11(x1, x2) = a__U11(x1, x2)
a__plus(x1, x2) = a__plus(x1, x2)
a__U21(x1, x2, x3) = a__U21(x1, x2, x3)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[tt, 0] > s₁ > A_{_AND₁}
[plus₂, U21₃, a_{_plus₂}, a_{_U21₃}] > [A_{_U11}, U11₂, a_{_U11₂}] > A_{_AND₁}
[plus₂, U21₃, a_{_plus₂}, a_{_U21₃}] > s₁ > A_{_AND₁}
[plus₂, U21₃, a_{_plus₂}, a_{_U21₃}] > [a_{_and₂}, and₂] > A_{_AND₁}

Status:

A_{_U11}: []
tt: multiset
A_{_AND₁}: multiset
plus₂: [2,1]
s₁: [1]
0: multiset
a_{_and₂}: multiset
U11₂: multiset
U21₃: [2,3,1]
and₂: multiset
a_{_U11₂}: multiset
a_{_plus₂}: [2,1]
a_{_U21₃}: [2,3,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
a__U11(tt, N) → mark(N)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__isNat(V1)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U21(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
MARK(isNat(X)) → A__ISNAT(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__isNat(V1)
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
A__U21(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__isNat(V1)
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
A__U21(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = A__PLUS(x2)
A__U21(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__U21(x0, x2)

Tags:
A__PLUS has argument tags [0,1,0] and root tag 1
A__U21 has argument tags [0,0,0,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
A__PLUS(x1, x2) = x1
s(x1) = s(x1)
A__U21(x1, x2, x3) = A__U21(x2)
a__and(x1, x2) = x2
a__isNat(x1) = x1
isNat(x1) = x1
tt = tt
mark(x1) = x1
0 = 0
U11(x1, x2) = U11(x1, x2)
a__U11(x1, x2) = a__U11(x1, x2)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
a__plus(x1, x2) = a__plus(x1, x2)
and(x1, x2) = x2
U21(x1, x2, x3) = U21(x1, x2, x3)
a__U21(x1, x2, x3) = a__U21(x1, x2, x3)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[tt, 0] > [plus₂, a_{_plus₂}, U21₃, a_{_U21₃}] > [s₁, A_{_U21₁}]
[tt, 0] > [plus₂, a_{_plus₂}, U21₃, a_{_U21₃}] > [U11₂, a_{_U11₂}]

Status:

s₁: [1]
A_{_U21₁}: [1]
tt: multiset
0: multiset
U11₂: multiset
a_{_U11₂}: multiset
plus₂: [1,2]
a_{_plus₂}: [1,2]
U21₃: [3,2,1]
a_{_U21₃}: [3,2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

a__isNat(0) → tt
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
a__U11(tt, N) → mark(N)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__isNat(V1)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, N) → mark(N)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isNat(0) → tt
a__isNat(plus(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNat(V1), isNat(V2))
a__isNat(s(V1)) → a__isNat(V1)
a__plus(N, 0) → a__U11(a__isNat(N), N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U21(a__and(a__isNat(M), isNat(N)), M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isNat(X)) → a__isNat(X)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2) → U11(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isNat(X) → isNat(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Obligation:

(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(8) Obligation:

(9) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(10) TRUE