Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpHRguvN/PEANO_nokinds-noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳6 QDP

↳7 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳8 AND

    ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳11 QDP

        ↳12 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳13 TRUE

    ↳14 QDP

        ↳15 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳16 QDP

        ↳17 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳18 TRUE

    ↳19 QDP

        ↳20 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳21 QDP

        ↳22 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳23 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(tt, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V2)))
U11¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → S(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNat(activate(V1)))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(isNat(N), N)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
ACTIVATE(n__0) → 0¹
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(activate(X1), activate(X2))
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → S(activate(X))
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → ACTIVATE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(activate(X1), activate(X2))
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(isNat(N), N)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → ACTIVATE(X)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(activate(X1), activate(X2))
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(isNat(N), N)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U42¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ISNAT(activate(N))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U11¹(x0, x1, x2) = U11¹(x1, x2)
ISNAT(x0, x1) = ISNAT(x1)
ACTIVATE(x0, x1) = ACTIVATE(x0, x1)
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x0, x1, x2)
U31¹(x0, x1, x2) = U31¹(x0)
U41¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U41¹(x0, x2, x3)
U42¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U42¹(x0, x1, x3)

Tags:
U11¹ has argument tags [16,8,6] and root tag 4
ISNAT has argument tags [24,6] and root tag 4
ACTIVATE has argument tags [6,0] and root tag 3
PLUS has argument tags [0,0,2] and root tag 0
U31¹ has argument tags [0,1,20] and root tag 2
U41¹ has argument tags [0,6,4,1] and root tag 0
U42¹ has argument tags [0,4,12,16] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U11¹(x1, x2) = U11¹(x1, x2)
tt = tt
ISNAT(x1) = x1
activate(x1) = x1
n__plus(x1, x2) = n__plus(x1, x2)
isNat(x1) = isNat
ACTIVATE(x1) = ACTIVATE
PLUS(x1, x2) = PLUS(x1, x2)
0 = 0
U31¹(x1, x2) = U31¹(x1, x2)
n__s(x1) = x1
s(x1) = x1
U41¹(x1, x2, x3) = U41¹(x2, x3)
U42¹(x1, x2, x3) = U42¹(x2, x3)
n__0 = n__0
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
U31(x1, x2) = U31(x1, x2)
U11(x1, x2) = U11
U21(x1) = x1
U41(x1, x2, x3) = U41(x2, x3)
U12(x1) = U12
U42(x1, x2, x3) = U42(x2, x3)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

U11^1₂ > [tt, ACTIVATE]
[n_{_plus₂}, PLUS₂, 0, U41^1₂, U42^1₂, n_₀, plus₂, U31₂, U41₂, U42₂] > [isNat, U11] > U12 > [tt, ACTIVATE]
[n_{_plus₂}, PLUS₂, 0, U41^1₂, U42^1₂, n_₀, plus₂, U31₂, U41₂, U42₂] > U31^1₂ > [tt, ACTIVATE]

Status:

U11^1₂: [1,2]
tt: []
n_{_plus₂}: [2,1]
isNat: []
ACTIVATE: []
PLUS₂: [2,1]
0: []
U31^1₂: [2,1]
U41^1₂: [1,2]
U42^1₂: [1,2]
n_₀: []
plus₂: [2,1]
U31₂: [1,2]
U11: []
U41₂: [1,2]
U12: []
U42₂: [1,2]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
U21(tt) → tt
U12(tt) → tt
0 → n__0

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 1 less node.

(8) Complex Obligation (AND)

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U41¹(tt, M, N) → U42¹(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(isNat(M), M, N)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U41¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U41¹(x0, x1, x2)
U42¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U42¹(x0, x2)
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x2)

Tags:
U41¹ has argument tags [2,11,4,1] and root tag 2
U42¹ has argument tags [11,12,4,2] and root tag 0
PLUS has argument tags [5,0,0] and root tag 1

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
U41¹(x1, x2, x3) = x2
tt = tt
U42¹(x1, x2, x3) = U42¹
isNat(x1) = isNat
activate(x1) = x1
PLUS(x1, x2) = x1
s(x1) = s(x1)
n__0 = n__0
0 = 0
n__plus(x1, x2) = n__plus(x1, x2)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
U31(x1, x2) = U31(x2)
n__s(x1) = n__s(x1)
U11(x1, x2) = x1
U21(x1) = x1
U41(x1, x2, x3) = U41(x1, x2, x3)
U12(x1) = x1
U42(x1, x2, x3) = U42(x1, x2, x3)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[n_₀, 0] > [tt, U42^1, isNat, s₁, n_{_s₁}]
[n_₀, 0] > U31₁
[n_{_plus₂}, plus₂, U41₃, U42₃] > [tt, U42^1, isNat, s₁, n_{_s₁}]
[n_{_plus₂}, plus₂, U41₃, U42₃] > U31₁

Status:

tt: []
U42^1: []
isNat: []
s₁: [1]
n_₀: []
0: []
n_{_plus₂}: [2,1]
plus₂: [2,1]
U31₁: [1]
n_{_s₁}: [1]
U41₃: [2,3,1]
U42₃: [2,3,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
U21(tt) → tt
U12(tt) → tt
0 → n__0

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(13) TRUE

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ISNAT(x0, x1) = ISNAT(x1)

Tags:
ISNAT has argument tags [1,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ISNAT(x1) = ISNAT(x1)
n__s(x1) = n__s(x1)
activate(x1) = x1
n__0 = n__0
0 = 0
n__plus(x1, x2) = n__plus(x1, x2)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
U31(x1, x2) = x2
isNat(x1) = isNat
tt = tt
s(x1) = s(x1)
U41(x1, x2, x3) = U41(x1, x2, x3)
U11(x1, x2) = x1
U21(x1) = x1
U42(x1, x2, x3) = U42(x1, x2, x3)
U12(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

ISNAT₁ > [n_{_s₁}, s₁]
[n_₀, 0] > [n_{_plus₂}, plus₂, isNat, tt, U41₃, U42₃] > [n_{_s₁}, s₁]

Status:

ISNAT₁: [1]
n_{_s₁}: [1]
n_₀: []
0: []
n_{_plus₂}: [2,1]
plus₂: [2,1]
isNat: []
tt: []
s₁: [1]
U41₃: [2,3,1]
U42₃: [2,3,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNat(n__0) → tt
s(X) → n__s(X)
U21(tt) → tt
U12(tt) → tt
0 → n__0

(16) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(17) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(18) TRUE

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → ACTIVATE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → ACTIVATE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ACTIVATE(x0, x1) = ACTIVATE(x1)

Tags:
ACTIVATE has argument tags [1,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVATE(x1) = ACTIVATE
n__s(x1) = n__s(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

ACTIVATE: []
n_{_s₁}: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12(tt) → tt
U21(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → U42(isNat(activate(N)), activate(M), activate(N))
U42(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNat(activate(V1)))
plus(N, 0) → U31(isNat(N), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(isNat(M), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Obligation:

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(8) Complex Obligation (AND)

(9) Obligation:

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) Obligation:

(12) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(13) TRUE

(14) Obligation:

(15) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) Obligation:

(17) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(18) TRUE

(19) Obligation:

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(21) Obligation:

(22) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(23) TRUE