Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpc2ZsQw/PEANO_complete

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳6 QDP

↳7 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳8 AND

    ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳11 QDP

        ↳12 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳13 QDP

        ↳14 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳15 QDP

        ↳16 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳17 TRUE

    ↳18 QDP

        ↳19 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳20 QDP

        ↳21 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳22 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U12¹(tt, V2) → U13¹(isNat(activate(V2)))
U12¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
U12¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U21¹(tt, V1) → U22¹(isNat(activate(V1)))
U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U21¹(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → S(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
ACTIVATE(n__0) → 0¹
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ACTIVATE(n__s(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U21¹(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U12¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, 0) → ISNAT(N)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → U21¹(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
U21¹(tt, V1) → ISNAT(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNAT(n__s(V1)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U21¹(tt, V1) → ACTIVATE(V1)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → U41¹(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → PLUS(activate(N), activate(M))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(M)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → ISNAT(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
U41¹(tt, M, N) → ACTIVATE(M)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V1)
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U12¹(x0, x1, x2) = U12¹(x0, x1)
ISNAT(x0, x1) = ISNAT(x0, x1)
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x0)
ACTIVATE(x0, x1) = ACTIVATE(x0, x1)
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x0, x2)
U31¹(x0, x1, x2) = U31¹(x0, x1)
ISNATKIND(x0, x1) = ISNATKIND(x1)
AND(x0, x1, x2) = AND(x0, x1)
U21¹(x0, x1, x2) = U21¹(x0)
U41¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U41¹(x0)

Tags:
U12¹ has argument tags [0,0,0] and root tag 1
ISNAT has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 1
U11¹ has argument tags [0,0,0,0] and root tag 1
ACTIVATE has argument tags [16,16] and root tag 2
PLUS has argument tags [16,0,16] and root tag 2
U31¹ has argument tags [16,16,0] and root tag 2
ISNATKIND has argument tags [17,16] and root tag 2
AND has argument tags [16,16,27] and root tag 2
U21¹ has argument tags [0,0,10] and root tag 4
U41¹ has argument tags [16,11,8,0] and root tag 5

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 1
POL(ACTIVATE(x₁)) = 0
POL(AND(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(ISNAT(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(ISNATKIND(x₁)) = 1
POL(PLUS(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U11(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(U11¹(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U12¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U13(x₁)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(U21¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U22(x₁)) = 0
POL(U31(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U31¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U41(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(U41¹(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₂ + x₃
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 1
POL(isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__0) = 1
POL(n__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
U22(tt) → tt
U13(tt) → tt
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs.

(8) Complex Obligation (AND)

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PLUS(N, 0) → U31¹(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
U31¹(tt, N) → ACTIVATE(N)
ACTIVATE(n__plus(X1, X2)) → PLUS(X1, X2)
PLUS(N, 0) → AND(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → AND(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ISNATKIND(activate(V1))
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNATKIND(n__plus(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)))
PLUS(N, s(M)) → AND(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = PLUS(x1, x2)
U31¹(x0, x1, x2) = U31¹(x0)
ACTIVATE(x0, x1) = ACTIVATE(x0, x1)
AND(x0, x1, x2) = AND(x0, x1, x2)
ISNATKIND(x0, x1) = ISNATKIND(x0, x1)

Tags:
PLUS has argument tags [0,8,5] and root tag 4
U31¹ has argument tags [8,7,1] and root tag 2
ACTIVATE has argument tags [8,4] and root tag 0
AND has argument tags [8,2,4] and root tag 0
ISNATKIND has argument tags [8,2] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ACTIVATE(x₁)) = 0
POL(AND(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(ISNATKIND(x₁)) = 0
POL(PLUS(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U11(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U13(x₁)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U22(x₁)) = 0
POL(U31(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₂
POL(U31¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U41(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__0) = 0
POL(n__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(n__s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(11) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)
ACTIVATE(n__isNatKind(X)) → ISNATKIND(X)
ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(12) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(13) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(14) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVATE(n__and(X1, X2)) → AND(X1, X2)
AND(tt, X) → ACTIVATE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ACTIVATE(x0, x1) = ACTIVATE(x1)
AND(x0, x1, x2) = AND(x0)

Tags:
ACTIVATE has argument tags [7,4] and root tag 1
AND has argument tags [4,6,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ACTIVATE(x₁)) = 0
POL(AND(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(tt) = 1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(17) TRUE

(18) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNAT(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11¹(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → U12¹(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U11¹(tt, V1, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ISNAT(x0, x1) = ISNAT(x1)
U11¹(x0, x1, x2, x3) = U11¹(x1, x2, x3)
U12¹(x0, x1, x2) = U12¹(x0, x1, x2)

Tags:
ISNAT has argument tags [4,7] and root tag 3
U11¹ has argument tags [8,7,8,13] and root tag 0
U12¹ has argument tags [6,11,7] and root tag 3

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(ISNAT(x₁)) = 0
POL(U11(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 0
POL(U11¹(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₃
POL(U12(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U12¹(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U13(x₁)) = 0
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U22(x₁)) = 0
POL(U31(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U41(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(isNat(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__0) = 0
POL(n__and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(n__isNatKind(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n__plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(n__s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(plus(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(s(x₁)) = x₁
POL(tt) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(X) → X
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
s(X) → n__s(X)
0 → n__0

(20) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U12¹(tt, V2) → ISNAT(activate(V2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

U11(tt, V1, V2) → U12(isNat(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U12(tt, V2) → U13(isNat(activate(V2)))
U13(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V1) → U22(isNat(activate(V1)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt, N) → activate(N)
U41(tt, M, N) → s(plus(activate(N), activate(M)))
and(tt, X) → activate(X)
isNat(n__0) → tt
isNat(n__plus(V1, V2)) → U11(and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2))), activate(V1), activate(V2))
isNat(n__s(V1)) → U21(isNatKind(activate(V1)), activate(V1))
isNatKind(n__0) → tt
isNatKind(n__plus(V1, V2)) → and(isNatKind(activate(V1)), n__isNatKind(activate(V2)))
isNatKind(n__s(V1)) → isNatKind(activate(V1))
plus(N, 0) → U31(and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N)), N)
plus(N, s(M)) → U41(and(and(isNat(M), n__isNatKind(M)), n__and(isNat(N), n__isNatKind(N))), M, N)
0 → n__0
plus(X1, X2) → n__plus(X1, X2)
isNatKind(X) → n__isNatKind(X)
s(X) → n__s(X)
and(X1, X2) → n__and(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__plus(X1, X2)) → plus(X1, X2)
activate(n__isNatKind(X)) → isNatKind(X)
activate(n__s(X)) → s(X)
activate(n__and(X1, X2)) → and(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(21) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Obligation:

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(8) Complex Obligation (AND)

(9) Obligation:

(10) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) Obligation:

(12) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(13) Obligation:

(14) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(15) Obligation:

(16) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) TRUE

(18) Obligation:

(19) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(20) Obligation:

(21) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(22) TRUE