Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpwdPM9p/PALINDROME_nokinds_noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳9 TRUE

    ↳10 QDP

        ↳11 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳12 QDP

        ↳13 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳14 TRUE

    ↳15 QDP

        ↳16 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳17 QDP

        ↳18 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳19 QDP

        ↳20 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳21 QDP

        ↳22 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳23 QDP

        ↳24 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳25 QDP

        ↳26 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳27 QDP

        ↳28 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳29 QDP

        ↳30 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳31 QDP

        ↳32 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳33 QDP

        ↳34 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳35 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(X)
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(Y), mark(Z))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Y)
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Z)
A____(X, nil) → MARK(X)
A____(nil, X) → MARK(X)
A__U21(tt, V2) → A__U22(a__isList(V2))
A__U21(tt, V2) → A__ISLIST(V2)
A__U41(tt, V2) → A__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
A__U41(tt, V2) → A__ISNELIST(V2)
A__U51(tt, V2) → A__U52(a__isList(V2))
A__U51(tt, V2) → A__ISLIST(V2)
A__U71(tt, P) → A__U72(a__isPal(P))
A__U71(tt, P) → A__ISPAL(P)
A__ISLIST(V) → A__U11(a__isNeList(V))
A__ISLIST(V) → A__ISNELIST(V)
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISNELIST(V) → A__U31(a__isQid(V))
A__ISNELIST(V) → A__ISQID(V)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISNELIST(V1)
A__ISNEPAL(V) → A__U61(a__isQid(V))
A__ISNEPAL(V) → A__ISQID(V)
A__ISNEPAL(__(I, __(P, I))) → A__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
A__ISNEPAL(__(I, __(P, I))) → A__ISQID(I)
A__ISPAL(V) → A__U81(a__isNePal(V))
A__ISPAL(V) → A__ISNEPAL(V)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → A____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(U11(X)) → A__U11(mark(X))
MARK(U11(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X1, X2)) → A__U21(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U21(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U22(X)) → A__U22(mark(X))
MARK(U22(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(isList(X)) → A__ISLIST(X)
MARK(U31(X)) → A__U31(mark(X))
MARK(U31(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U41(X1, X2)) → A__U41(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U41(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X)) → A__U42(mark(X))
MARK(U42(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(isNeList(X)) → A__ISNELIST(X)
MARK(U51(X1, X2)) → A__U51(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U51(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U52(X)) → A__U52(mark(X))
MARK(U52(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U61(X)) → A__U61(mark(X))
MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U71(X1, X2)) → A__U71(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(U71(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U72(X)) → A__U72(mark(X))
MARK(U72(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(isPal(X)) → A__ISPAL(X)
MARK(U81(X)) → A__U81(mark(X))
MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(isQid(X)) → A__ISQID(X)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → A__ISNEPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 3 SCCs with 28 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U71(tt, P) → A__ISPAL(P)
A__ISPAL(V) → A__ISNEPAL(V)
A__ISNEPAL(__(I, __(P, I))) → A__U71(a__isQid(I), P)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__U71(tt, P) → A__ISPAL(P)
A__ISNEPAL(__(I, __(P, I))) → A__U71(a__isQid(I), P)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
A__U71(x1, x2) = A__U71(x1, x2)
tt = tt
A__ISPAL(x1) = x1
A__ISNEPAL(x1) = x1
__(x1, x2) = __(x1, x2)
a__isQid(x1) = a__isQid
a = a
e = e
i = i
o = o
u = u
isQid(x1) = isQid

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[_{_₂}, a_{_isQid}] > A_{_U71₂} > isQid
[_{_₂}, a_{_isQid}] > tt > isQid
a > isQid
e > isQid
i > tt > isQid
o > isQid
u > tt > isQid

Status:

A_{_U71₂}: [1,2]
tt: []
__₂: [1,2]
a_{_isQid}: []
a: []
e: []
i: []
o: []
u: []
isQid: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__ISPAL(V) → A__ISNEPAL(V)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U21(tt, V2) → A__ISLIST(V2)
A__ISLIST(V) → A__ISNELIST(V)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
A__U41(tt, V2) → A__ISNELIST(V2)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
A__U51(tt, V2) → A__ISLIST(V2)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISNELIST(V1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__ISLIST(V) → A__ISNELIST(V)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
A__U41(tt, V2) → A__ISNELIST(V2)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
A__U51(tt, V2) → A__ISLIST(V2)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISNELIST(V1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
A__U21(x1, x2) = A__U21(x2)
tt = tt
A__ISLIST(x1) = A__ISLIST(x1)
A__ISNELIST(x1) = A__ISNELIST(x1)
__(x1, x2) = __(x1, x2)
A__U41(x1, x2) = A__U41(x1, x2)
a__isList(x1) = a__isList
A__U51(x1, x2) = A__U51(x1, x2)
a__isNeList(x1) = a__isNeList
a__U11(x1) = x1
nil = nil
a__U21(x1, x2) = x1
isList(x1) = isList
a__U31(x1) = x1
a__isQid(x1) = a__isQid
a__U41(x1, x2) = a__U41
a__U51(x1, x2) = x1
isNeList(x1) = isNeList
a__U42(x1) = x1
a__U52(x1) = a__U52
a__U22(x1) = a__U22
U41(x1, x2) = U41
U11(x1) = U11
U51(x1, x2) = x1
U52(x1) = U52
U21(x1, x2) = U21
U22(x1) = U22
U42(x1) = x1
a = a
e = e
i = i
o = o
u = u
isQid(x1) = isQid
U31(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[_{_₂}, a_{_isList}, a_{_isNeList}, a_{_isQid}, a_{_U41}, isNeList, U41, isQid] > [A_{_U21₁}, A_{_ISLIST₁}, A_{_U51₂}] > [tt, A_{_ISNELIST₁}, nil, a_{_U52}, a_{_U22}, U52, U22] > [U11, U21]
[_{_₂}, a_{_isList}, a_{_isNeList}, a_{_isQid}, a_{_U41}, isNeList, U41, isQid] > A_{_U41₂} > [tt, A_{_ISNELIST₁}, nil, a_{_U52}, a_{_U22}, U52, U22] > [U11, U21]
[_{_₂}, a_{_isList}, a_{_isNeList}, a_{_isQid}, a_{_U41}, isNeList, U41, isQid] > isList > [U11, U21]
a > [tt, A_{_ISNELIST₁}, nil, a_{_U52}, a_{_U22}, U52, U22] > [U11, U21]
e > [tt, A_{_ISNELIST₁}, nil, a_{_U52}, a_{_U22}, U52, U22] > [U11, U21]
i > [tt, A_{_ISNELIST₁}, nil, a_{_U52}, a_{_U22}, U52, U22] > [U11, U21]
o > [tt, A_{_ISNELIST₁}, nil, a_{_U52}, a_{_U22}, U52, U22] > [U11, U21]
u > [tt, A_{_ISNELIST₁}, nil, a_{_U52}, a_{_U22}, U52, U22] > [U11, U21]

Status:

A_{_U21₁}: [1]
tt: []
A_{_ISLIST₁}: [1]
A_{_ISNELIST₁}: [1]
__₂: [2,1]
A_{_U41₂}: [1,2]
a_{_isList}: []
A_{_U51₂}: [2,1]
a_{_isNeList}: []
nil: []
isList: []
a_{_isQid}: []
a_{_U41}: []
isNeList: []
a_{_U52}: []
a_{_U22}: []
U41: []
U11: []
U52: []
U21: []
U22: []
a: []
e: []
i: []
o: []
u: []
isQid: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U31(X) → U31(X)

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U21(tt, V2) → A__ISLIST(V2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(X)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → A____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(Y), mark(Z))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Y)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(U11(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U21(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U22(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U41(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U42(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U51(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U52(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U71(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U72(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Z)
A____(X, nil) → MARK(X)
A____(nil, X) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(X)
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(Y), mark(Z))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Y)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(U21(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U41(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U51(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U52(X)) → MARK(X)
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Z)
A____(X, nil) → MARK(X)
A____(nil, X) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
A____(x1, x2) = A____(x1, x2)
__(x1, x2) = __(x1, x2)
MARK(x1) = x1
mark(x1) = x1
a____(x1, x2) = a____(x1, x2)
U11(x1) = x1
U21(x1, x2) = U21(x1, x2)
U22(x1) = x1
U31(x1) = x1
U41(x1, x2) = U41(x1, x2)
U42(x1) = x1
U51(x1, x2) = U51(x1, x2)
U52(x1) = U52(x1)
U61(x1) = x1
U71(x1, x2) = x1
U72(x1) = x1
U81(x1) = x1
nil = nil
a__U11(x1) = x1
a__U21(x1, x2) = a__U21(x1, x2)
a__U22(x1) = x1
isList(x1) = isList(x1)
a__isList(x1) = a__isList(x1)
a__U31(x1) = x1
a__U41(x1, x2) = a__U41(x1, x2)
a__U42(x1) = x1
isNeList(x1) = isNeList(x1)
a__isNeList(x1) = a__isNeList(x1)
a__U51(x1, x2) = a__U51(x1, x2)
a__U52(x1) = a__U52(x1)
a__U61(x1) = x1
a__U71(x1, x2) = x1
a__U72(x1) = x1
isPal(x1) = isPal
a__isPal(x1) = a__isPal
a__U81(x1) = x1
isQid(x1) = isQid
a__isQid(x1) = a__isQid
isNePal(x1) = isNePal
a__isNePal(x1) = a__isNePal
tt = tt
a = a
e = e
i = i
o = o
u = u

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[A_{_{_{_₂}}}, _{_₂}, a_{_{_{_₂}}}] > [U21₂, a_{_U21₂}] > [isList₁, a_{_isList₁}] > [isNeList₁, a_{_isNeList₁}] > [isPal, a_{_isPal}, isQid, a_{_isQid}, isNePal, a_{_isNePal}, tt] > [U52₁, a_{_U52₁}]
[A_{_{_{_₂}}}, _{_₂}, a_{_{_{_₂}}}] > [U41₂, a_{_U41₂}] > [isNeList₁, a_{_isNeList₁}] > [isPal, a_{_isPal}, isQid, a_{_isQid}, isNePal, a_{_isNePal}, tt] > [U52₁, a_{_U52₁}]
[A_{_{_{_₂}}}, _{_₂}, a_{_{_{_₂}}}] > [U51₂, a_{_U51₂}] > [isList₁, a_{_isList₁}] > [isNeList₁, a_{_isNeList₁}] > [isPal, a_{_isPal}, isQid, a_{_isQid}, isNePal, a_{_isNePal}, tt] > [U52₁, a_{_U52₁}]
e > [isPal, a_{_isPal}, isQid, a_{_isQid}, isNePal, a_{_isNePal}, tt] > [U52₁, a_{_U52₁}]
o > [isPal, a_{_isPal}, isQid, a_{_isQid}, isNePal, a_{_isNePal}, tt] > [U52₁, a_{_U52₁}]
u > [isPal, a_{_isPal}, isQid, a_{_isQid}, isNePal, a_{_isNePal}, tt] > [U52₁, a_{_U52₁}]

Status:

A_{_{_{_₂}}}: [1,2]
__₂: [1,2]
a_{_{_{_₂}}}: [1,2]
U21₂: [2,1]
U41₂: [1,2]
U51₂: [2,1]
U52₁: [1]
nil: []
a_{_U21₂}: [2,1]
isList₁: [1]
a_{_isList₁}: [1]
a_{_U41₂}: [1,2]
isNeList₁: [1]
a_{_isNeList₁}: [1]
a_{_U51₂}: [2,1]
a_{_U52₁}: [1]
isPal: []
a_{_isPal}: []
isQid: []
a_{_isQid}: []
isNePal: []
a_{_isNePal}: []
tt: []
a: []
e: []
i: []
o: []
u: []

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(__(X1, X2)) → A____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(U11(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U22(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U42(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U71(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U72(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U22(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U11(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U42(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U71(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U72(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U22(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U71(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
U22(x1) = U22(x1)
U11(x1) = x1
U31(x1) = x1
U42(x1) = x1
U61(x1) = x1
U71(x1, x2) = U71(x1, x2)
U72(x1) = x1
U81(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

MARK₁: [1]
U22₁: [1]
U71₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(21) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U42(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U72(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U72(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
U11(x1) = x1
U31(x1) = x1
U42(x1) = x1
U61(x1) = x1
U72(x1) = U72(x1)
U81(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

MARK₁: [1]
U72₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(23) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U31(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U42(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U31(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
U11(x1) = x1
U31(x1) = U31(x1)
U42(x1) = x1
U61(x1) = x1
U81(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

MARK₁: [1]
U31₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(25) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U42(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U42(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = x1
U11(x1) = x1
U42(x1) = U42(x1)
U61(x1) = x1
U81(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U42₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(27) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(28) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U11(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = MARK(x1)
U11(x1) = U11(x1)
U61(x1) = x1
U81(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

MARK₁: [1]
U11₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(29) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(30) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U61(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = x1
U61(x1) = U61(x1)
U81(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U61₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(31) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(32) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

MARK(U81(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
MARK(x1) = x1
U81(x1) = U81(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [LPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

U81₁: [1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(33) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__U11(tt) → tt
a__U21(tt, V2) → a__U22(a__isList(V2))
a__U22(tt) → tt
a__U31(tt) → tt
a__U41(tt, V2) → a__U42(a__isNeList(V2))
a__U42(tt) → tt
a__U51(tt, V2) → a__U52(a__isList(V2))
a__U52(tt) → tt
a__U61(tt) → tt
a__U71(tt, P) → a__U72(a__isPal(P))
a__U72(tt) → tt
a__U81(tt) → tt
a__isList(V) → a__U11(a__isNeList(V))
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U21(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(V) → a__U31(a__isQid(V))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U41(a__isList(V1), V2)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__U51(a__isNeList(V1), V2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__U61(a__isQid(V))
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__U71(a__isQid(I), P)
a__isPal(V) → a__U81(a__isNePal(V))
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U11(X)) → a__U11(mark(X))
mark(U21(X1, X2)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U22(X)) → a__U22(mark(X))
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(U31(X)) → a__U31(mark(X))
mark(U41(X1, X2)) → a__U41(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U42(X)) → a__U42(mark(X))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(U51(X1, X2)) → a__U51(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U52(X)) → a__U52(mark(X))
mark(U61(X)) → a__U61(mark(X))
mark(U71(X1, X2)) → a__U71(mark(X1), X2)
mark(U72(X)) → a__U72(mark(X))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(U81(X)) → a__U81(mark(X))
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__U11(X) → U11(X)
a__U21(X1, X2) → U21(X1, X2)
a__U22(X) → U22(X)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__U31(X) → U31(X)
a__U41(X1, X2) → U41(X1, X2)
a__U42(X) → U42(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__U51(X1, X2) → U51(X1, X2)
a__U52(X) → U52(X)
a__U61(X) → U61(X)
a__U71(X1, X2) → U71(X1, X2)
a__U72(X) → U72(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)
a__U81(X) → U81(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(34) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) TRUE

(10) Obligation:

(11) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) Obligation:

(13) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) TRUE

(15) Obligation:

(16) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(17) Obligation:

(18) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(19) Obligation:

(20) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(21) Obligation:

(22) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(23) Obligation:

(24) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(25) Obligation:

(26) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(27) Obligation:

(28) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(29) Obligation:

(30) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(31) Obligation:

(32) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(33) Obligation:

(34) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(35) TRUE