Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpnaWHLa/PALINDROME_nokinds

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳6 QDP

↳7 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳8 QDP

↳9 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳10 QDP

↳11 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

↳12 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isList(V) → a__isNeList(V)
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNeList(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNePal(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
a__isPal(V) → a__isNePal(V)
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(X)
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(Y), mark(Z))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Y)
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Z)
A____(X, nil) → MARK(X)
A____(nil, X) → MARK(X)
A__AND(tt, X) → MARK(X)
A__ISLIST(V) → A__ISNELIST(V)
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISNELIST(V) → A__ISQID(V)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISNELIST(V1)
A__ISNEPAL(V) → A__ISQID(V)
A__ISNEPAL(__(I, __(P, I))) → A__AND(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
A__ISNEPAL(__(I, __(P, I))) → A__ISQID(I)
A__ISPAL(V) → A__ISNEPAL(V)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → A____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isList(X)) → A__ISLIST(X)
MARK(isNeList(X)) → A__ISNELIST(X)
MARK(isQid(X)) → A__ISQID(X)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → A__ISNEPAL(X)
MARK(isPal(X)) → A__ISPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isList(V) → a__isNeList(V)
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNeList(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNePal(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
a__isPal(V) → a__isNePal(V)
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 4 less nodes.

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(X)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → A____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(Y), mark(Z))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Y)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
A__AND(tt, X) → MARK(X)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(isList(X)) → A__ISLIST(X)
A__ISLIST(V) → A__ISNELIST(V)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISNELIST(V1)
MARK(isNeList(X)) → A__ISNELIST(X)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → A__ISNEPAL(X)
A__ISNEPAL(__(I, __(P, I))) → A__AND(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
MARK(isPal(X)) → A__ISPAL(X)
A__ISPAL(V) → A__ISNEPAL(V)
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Z)
A____(X, nil) → MARK(X)
A____(nil, X) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isList(V) → a__isNeList(V)
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNeList(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNePal(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
a__isPal(V) → a__isNePal(V)
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(X)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → A____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(Y), mark(Z))
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Y)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(__(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → A__AND(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(and(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
A__ISLIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISLIST(V1)
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__AND(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
A__ISNELIST(__(V1, V2)) → A__ISNELIST(V1)
MARK(isNePal(X)) → A__ISNEPAL(X)
A__ISNEPAL(__(I, __(P, I))) → A__AND(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
A__ISPAL(V) → A__ISNEPAL(V)
A____(__(X, Y), Z) → MARK(Z)
A____(X, nil) → MARK(X)
A____(nil, X) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(A__AND(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(A__ISLIST(x₁)) = x₁
POL(A__ISNELIST(x₁)) = x₁
POL(A__ISNEPAL(x₁)) = x₁
POL(A__ISPAL(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(A____(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(MARK(x₁)) = x₁
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a) = 0
POL(a____(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a__and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a__isList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__isNeList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__isNePal(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(a__isPal(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(a__isQid(x₁)) = x₁
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(e) = 0
POL(i) = 0
POL(isList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(isPal(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(isQid(x₁)) = x₁
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 1
POL(o) = 0
POL(tt) = 0
POL(u) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
a__isList(V) → a__isNeList(V)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
a__isPal(V) → a__isNePal(V)
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isNeList(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isNePal(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
A__AND(tt, X) → MARK(X)
MARK(isList(X)) → A__ISLIST(X)
A__ISLIST(V) → A__ISNELIST(V)
MARK(isNeList(X)) → A__ISNELIST(X)
MARK(isPal(X)) → A__ISPAL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isList(V) → a__isNeList(V)
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNeList(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNePal(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
a__isPal(V) → a__isNePal(V)
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 5 less nodes.

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isList(V) → a__isNeList(V)
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNeList(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNePal(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
a__isPal(V) → a__isNePal(V)
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A____(__(X, Y), Z) → A____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(A____(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a) = 0
POL(a____(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a__and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(a__isList(x₁)) = 0
POL(a__isNeList(x₁)) = 0
POL(a__isNePal(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__isPal(x₁)) = x₁
POL(a__isQid(x₁)) = 0
POL(and(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(e) = 0
POL(i) = 0
POL(isList(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = 0
POL(isNePal(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isPal(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 0
POL(mark(x₁)) = x₁
POL(nil) = 0
POL(o) = 0
POL(tt) = 0
POL(u) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
a__isList(V) → a__isNeList(V)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
a__isPal(V) → a__isNePal(V)
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isNeList(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__isNePal(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)

(10) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a____(__(X, Y), Z) → a____(mark(X), a____(mark(Y), mark(Z)))
a____(X, nil) → mark(X)
a____(nil, X) → mark(X)
a__and(tt, X) → mark(X)
a__isList(V) → a__isNeList(V)
a__isList(nil) → tt
a__isList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNeList(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isList(V1), isNeList(V2))
a__isNeList(__(V1, V2)) → a__and(a__isNeList(V1), isList(V2))
a__isNePal(V) → a__isQid(V)
a__isNePal(__(I, __(P, I))) → a__and(a__isQid(I), isPal(P))
a__isPal(V) → a__isNePal(V)
a__isPal(nil) → tt
a__isQid(a) → tt
a__isQid(e) → tt
a__isQid(i) → tt
a__isQid(o) → tt
a__isQid(u) → tt
mark(__(X1, X2)) → a____(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(and(X1, X2)) → a__and(mark(X1), X2)
mark(isList(X)) → a__isList(X)
mark(isNeList(X)) → a__isNeList(X)
mark(isQid(X)) → a__isQid(X)
mark(isNePal(X)) → a__isNePal(X)
mark(isPal(X)) → a__isPal(X)
mark(nil) → nil
mark(tt) → tt
mark(a) → a
mark(e) → e
mark(i) → i
mark(o) → o
mark(u) → u
a____(X1, X2) → __(X1, X2)
a__and(X1, X2) → and(X1, X2)
a__isList(X) → isList(X)
a__isNeList(X) → isNeList(X)
a__isQid(X) → isQid(X)
a__isNePal(X) → isNePal(X)
a__isPal(X) → isPal(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(11) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Obligation:

(7) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(8) Obligation:

(9) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(10) Obligation:

(11) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(12) TRUE