Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpsjbZcR/PALINDROME_nokinds-noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳4 AND

    ↳5 QDP

        ↳6 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳7 QDP

        ↳8 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳9 QDP

        ↳10 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳11 TRUE

    ↳12 QDP

        ↳13 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳14 QDP

        ↳15 PisEmptyProof (⇔)

        ↳16 TRUE

    ↳17 QDP

        ↳18 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳19 QDP

        ↳20 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳21 TRUE

    ↳22 QDP

        ↳23 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳24 QDP

        ↳25 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳26 QDP

        ↳27 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳28 QDP

        ↳29 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳30 QDP

        ↳31 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳32 QDP

        ↳33 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

        ↳34 QDP

        ↳35 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

        ↳36 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)
U21¹(tt, V2) → U22¹(isList(activate(V2)))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
U21¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U41¹(tt, V2) → U42¹(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U51¹(tt, V2) → U52¹(isList(activate(V2)))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ACTIVATE(V2)
U71¹(tt, P) → U72¹(isPal(activate(P)))
U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))
U71¹(tt, P) → ACTIVATE(P)
ISLIST(V) → U11¹(isNeList(activate(V)))
ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISLIST(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNELIST(V) → U31¹(isQid(activate(V)))
ISNELIST(V) → ISQID(activate(V))
ISNELIST(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V1)
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ACTIVATE(V2)
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))
ISNEPAL(V) → U61¹(isQid(activate(V)))
ISNEPAL(V) → ISQID(activate(V))
ISNEPAL(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → ISQID(activate(I))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → ACTIVATE(I)
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → ACTIVATE(P)
ISPAL(V) → U81¹(isNePal(activate(V)))
ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))
ISPAL(V) → ACTIVATE(V)
ACTIVATE(n__nil) → NIL
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → __¹(activate(X1), activate(X2))
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)
ACTIVATE(n__a) → A
ACTIVATE(n__e) → E
ACTIVATE(n__i) → I
ACTIVATE(n__o) → O
ACTIVATE(n__u) → U

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 4 SCCs with 32 less nodes.

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)
__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(Y, Z)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
__¹(x0, x1, x2) = __¹(x0, x2)

Tags:
__¹ has argument tags [1,2,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(__¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(nil) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)

(7) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

__¹(__(X, Y), Z) → __¹(X, __(Y, Z))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
__¹(x0, x1, x2) = __¹(x1)

Tags:
__¹ has argument tags [3,1,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(__¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(nil) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)

(9) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X2)
ACTIVATE(n____(X1, X2)) → ACTIVATE(X1)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ACTIVATE(x0, x1) = ACTIVATE(x1)

Tags:
ACTIVATE has argument tags [1,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ACTIVATE(x₁)) = 0
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(14) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))
ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U71¹(tt, P) → ISPAL(activate(P))
ISNEPAL(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71¹(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U71¹(x0, x1, x2) = U71¹(x0, x1)
ISPAL(x0, x1) = ISPAL(x0, x1)
ISNEPAL(x0, x1) = ISNEPAL(x0, x1)

Tags:
U71¹ has argument tags [3,0,0] and root tag 3
ISPAL has argument tags [0,1] and root tag 0
ISNEPAL has argument tags [0,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ISNEPAL(x₁)) = 1
POL(ISPAL(x₁)) = 1
POL(U71¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a) = 0
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(e) = 0
POL(i) = 0
POL(isQid(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(n__a) = 0
POL(n__e) = 0
POL(n__i) = 0
POL(n__nil) = 0
POL(n__o) = 0
POL(n__u) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(o) = 0
POL(tt) = 1
POL(u) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X
__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
nil → n__nil
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u

(19) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISPAL(V) → ISNEPAL(activate(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(20) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(21) TRUE

(22) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(23) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

U21¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U21¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
U21¹(x0, x1, x2) = U21¹(x0, x1)
ISLIST(x0, x1) = ISLIST(x0, x1)
ISNELIST(x0, x1) = ISNELIST(x0)
U41¹(x0, x1, x2) = U41¹(x0, x2)
U51¹(x0, x1, x2) = U51¹(x2)

Tags:
U21¹ has argument tags [2,3,0] and root tag 3
ISLIST has argument tags [3,0] and root tag 4
ISNELIST has argument tags [3,12] and root tag 4
U41¹ has argument tags [3,1,3] and root tag 4
U51¹ has argument tags [12,4,3] and root tag 4

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ISLIST(x₁)) = x₁
POL(ISNELIST(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U21¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U22(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U31(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U41(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U41¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₁
POL(U42(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(U51(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U51¹(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(U52(x₁)) = x₁
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a) = 1
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(e) = 1
POL(i) = 1
POL(isList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isQid(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__a) = 1
POL(n__e) = 1
POL(n__i) = 1
POL(n__nil) = 1
POL(n__o) = 1
POL(n__u) = 1
POL(nil) = 1
POL(o) = 1
POL(tt) = 1
POL(u) = 1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U11(tt) → tt
U22(tt) → tt
U42(tt) → tt
U52(tt) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
nil → n__nil
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u

(24) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(25) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U41¹(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U41¹(tt, V2) → ISNELIST(activate(V2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ISLIST(x0, x1) = ISLIST(x1)
ISNELIST(x0, x1) = ISNELIST(x0)
U41¹(x0, x1, x2) = U41¹(x0, x2)
U51¹(x0, x1, x2) = U51¹(x2)

Tags:
ISLIST has argument tags [15,12] and root tag 2
ISNELIST has argument tags [12,0] and root tag 2
U41¹ has argument tags [12,13,12] and root tag 0
U51¹ has argument tags [0,14,12] and root tag 2

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ISLIST(x₁)) = 0
POL(ISNELIST(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U11(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U22(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U31(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U41(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U41¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U42(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U51(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U51¹(x₁, x₂)) = 1
POL(U52(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a) = 1
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(e) = 1
POL(i) = 1
POL(isList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isQid(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__a) = 1
POL(n__e) = 1
POL(n__i) = 1
POL(n__nil) = 1
POL(n__o) = 1
POL(n__u) = 1
POL(nil) = 1
POL(o) = 1
POL(tt) = 1
POL(u) = 1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U11(tt) → tt
U22(tt) → tt
U42(tt) → tt
U52(tt) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
nil → n__nil
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u

(26) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(27) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → U51¹(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U51¹(tt, V2) → ISLIST(activate(V2))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ISLIST(x0, x1) = ISLIST(x1)
ISNELIST(x0, x1) = ISNELIST(x0, x1)
U51¹(x0, x1, x2) = U51¹(x0, x2)

Tags:
ISLIST has argument tags [6,1] and root tag 2
ISNELIST has argument tags [0,1] and root tag 2
U51¹ has argument tags [1,4,1] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ISLIST(x₁)) = 1
POL(ISNELIST(x₁)) = 0
POL(U11(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U21(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U22(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(U31(x₁)) = x₁
POL(U41(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U42(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(U51(x₁, x₂)) = x₂
POL(U51¹(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(U52(x₁)) = x₁
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(a) = 1
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(e) = 1
POL(i) = 1
POL(isList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isNeList(x₁)) = x₁
POL(isQid(x₁)) = x₁
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = x₁ + x₂
POL(n__a) = 1
POL(n__e) = 1
POL(n__i) = 1
POL(n__nil) = 1
POL(n__o) = 1
POL(n__u) = 1
POL(nil) = 1
POL(o) = 1
POL(tt) = 1
POL(u) = 1

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U11(tt) → tt
isList(n__nil) → tt
U22(tt) → tt
U42(tt) → tt
U52(tt) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
nil → n__nil
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u

(28) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(29) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISNELIST(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ISLIST(x0, x1) = ISLIST(x0, x1)
ISNELIST(x0, x1) = ISNELIST(x0, x1)

Tags:
ISLIST has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 1
ISNELIST has argument tags [2,0] and root tag 1

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ISLIST(x₁)) = 1
POL(ISNELIST(x₁)) = 0
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a) = 0
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(e) = 0
POL(i) = 0
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(n__a) = 0
POL(n__e) = 0
POL(n__i) = 0
POL(n__nil) = 0
POL(n__o) = 0
POL(n__u) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(o) = 0
POL(u) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

(30) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))
ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISLIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ISLIST(x0, x1) = ISLIST(x0)
ISNELIST(x0, x1) = ISNELIST(x0, x1)

Tags:
ISLIST has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 0
ISNELIST has argument tags [0,0] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ISLIST(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(ISNELIST(x₁)) = 1
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a) = 0
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(e) = 0
POL(i) = 1
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(n__a) = 0
POL(n__e) = 0
POL(n__i) = 1
POL(n__nil) = 0
POL(n__o) = 0
POL(n__u) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(o) = 0
POL(u) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X
__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
nil → n__nil
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u

(32) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))
ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ISNELIST(n____(V1, V2)) → ISLIST(activate(V1))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
ISLIST(x0, x1) = ISLIST(x1)
ISNELIST(x0, x1) = ISNELIST(x1)

Tags:
ISLIST has argument tags [3,3] and root tag 0
ISNELIST has argument tags [2,3] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(ISLIST(x₁)) = x₁
POL(ISNELIST(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(__(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(a) = 0
POL(activate(x₁)) = x₁
POL(e) = 0
POL(i) = 0
POL(n____(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(n__a) = 0
POL(n__e) = 0
POL(n__i) = 0
POL(n__nil) = 0
POL(n__o) = 0
POL(n__u) = 0
POL(nil) = 0
POL(o) = 0
POL(u) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X
__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
nil → n__nil
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u

(34) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ISLIST(V) → ISNELIST(activate(V))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

__(__(X, Y), Z) → __(X, __(Y, Z))
__(X, nil) → X
__(nil, X) → X
U11(tt) → tt
U21(tt, V2) → U22(isList(activate(V2)))
U22(tt) → tt
U31(tt) → tt
U41(tt, V2) → U42(isNeList(activate(V2)))
U42(tt) → tt
U51(tt, V2) → U52(isList(activate(V2)))
U52(tt) → tt
U61(tt) → tt
U71(tt, P) → U72(isPal(activate(P)))
U72(tt) → tt
U81(tt) → tt
isList(V) → U11(isNeList(activate(V)))
isList(n__nil) → tt
isList(n____(V1, V2)) → U21(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(V) → U31(isQid(activate(V)))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U41(isList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNeList(n____(V1, V2)) → U51(isNeList(activate(V1)), activate(V2))
isNePal(V) → U61(isQid(activate(V)))
isNePal(n____(I, n____(P, I))) → U71(isQid(activate(I)), activate(P))
isPal(V) → U81(isNePal(activate(V)))
isPal(n__nil) → tt
isQid(n__a) → tt
isQid(n__e) → tt
isQid(n__i) → tt
isQid(n__o) → tt
isQid(n__u) → tt
nil → n__nil
__(X1, X2) → n____(X1, X2)
a → n__a
e → n__e
i → n__i
o → n__o
u → n__u
activate(n__nil) → nil
activate(n____(X1, X2)) → __(activate(X1), activate(X2))
activate(n__a) → a
activate(n__e) → e
activate(n__i) → i
activate(n__o) → o
activate(n__u) → u
activate(X) → X

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(35) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Complex Obligation (AND)

(5) Obligation:

(6) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(7) Obligation:

(8) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(9) Obligation:

(10) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(11) TRUE

(12) Obligation:

(13) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(14) Obligation:

(15) PisEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(16) TRUE

(17) Obligation:

(18) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(19) Obligation:

(20) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(21) TRUE

(22) Obligation:

(23) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(24) Obligation:

(25) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(26) Obligation:

(27) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(28) Obligation:

(29) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(30) Obligation:

(31) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(32) Obligation:

(33) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(34) Obligation:

(35) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(36) TRUE