Termination w.r.t. Q proof of /tmp/tmpaZbkhT/MYNAT_nosorts_noand

Termination w.r.t. Q of the given QTRS could be proven:

0 QTRS

↳1 DependencyPairsProof (⇔)

↳2 QDP

↳3 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳4 QDP

↳5 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳6 QDP

↳7 QDPOrderProof (⇔)

↳8 QDP

↳9 DependencyGraphProof (⇔)

↳10 TRUE

(0) Obligation:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, M, N) → a__U12(tt, M, N)
a__U12(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__U21(tt, M, N) → a__U22(tt, M, N)
a__U22(tt, M, N) → a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
a__plus(N, 0) → mark(N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U11(tt, M, N)
a__x(N, 0) → 0
a__x(N, s(M)) → a__U21(tt, M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(x(X1, X2)) → a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
a__U12(X1, X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__U22(X1, X2, X3) → U22(X1, X2, X3)
a__x(X1, X2) → x(X1, X2)

Q is empty.

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem.

(2) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, M, N) → A__U12(tt, M, N)
A__U12(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__U12(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
A__U12(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
A__U21(tt, M, N) → A__U22(tt, M, N)
A__U22(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
A__U22(tt, M, N) → A__X(mark(N), mark(M))
A__U22(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
A__U22(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → MARK(N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U11(tt, M, N)
A__X(N, s(M)) → A__U21(tt, M, N)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(x(X1, X2)) → A__X(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(x(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(x(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, M, N) → a__U12(tt, M, N)
a__U12(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__U21(tt, M, N) → a__U22(tt, M, N)
a__U22(tt, M, N) → a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
a__plus(N, 0) → mark(N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U11(tt, M, N)
a__x(N, 0) → 0
a__x(N, s(M)) → a__U21(tt, M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(x(X1, X2)) → a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
a__U12(X1, X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__U22(X1, X2, X3) → U22(X1, X2, X3)
a__x(X1, X2) → x(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__U21(tt, M, N) → A__U22(tt, M, N)
A__U22(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
A__U22(tt, M, N) → A__X(mark(N), mark(M))
A__U22(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
A__U22(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
A__X(N, s(M)) → A__U21(tt, M, N)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → A__PLUS(mark(X1), mark(X2))
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(plus(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → A__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3)
MARK(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(x(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(x(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__U11(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__U11(x0, x2)
A__U12(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__U12(x0, x2)
A__PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = A__PLUS(x0, x2)
MARK(x0, x1) = MARK(x0, x1)
A__U21(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__U21(x0, x1, x2, x3)
A__U22(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__U22(x0, x3)
A__X(x0, x1, x2) = A__X(x0, x1)

Tags:
A__U11 has argument tags [1,17,1,30] and root tag 0
A__U12 has argument tags [1,0,1,0] and root tag 0
A__PLUS has argument tags [1,16,1] and root tag 0
MARK has argument tags [0,1] and root tag 0
A__U21 has argument tags [28,1,0,30] and root tag 4
A__U22 has argument tags [1,16,0,3] and root tag 6
A__X has argument tags [1,4,24] and root tag 0

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
A__U11(x1, x2, x3) = x3
tt = tt
A__U12(x1, x2, x3) = x3
A__PLUS(x1, x2) = x1
mark(x1) = x1
MARK(x1) = x1
A__U21(x1, x2, x3) = A__U21(x2, x3)
A__U22(x1, x2, x3) = A__U22(x2, x3)
a__x(x1, x2) = a__x(x1, x2)
A__X(x1, x2) = A__X(x1, x2)
0 = 0
s(x1) = s(x1)
U11(x1, x2, x3) = U11(x1, x2, x3)
U12(x1, x2, x3) = U12(x1, x2, x3)
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
U21(x1, x2, x3) = U21(x1, x2, x3)
U22(x1, x2, x3) = U22(x1, x2, x3)
x(x1, x2) = x(x1, x2)
a__U11(x1, x2, x3) = a__U11(x1, x2, x3)
a__U12(x1, x2, x3) = a__U12(x1, x2, x3)
a__plus(x1, x2) = a__plus(x1, x2)
a__U21(x1, x2, x3) = a__U21(x1, x2, x3)
a__U22(x1, x2, x3) = a__U22(x1, x2, x3)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[A_{_U21₂}, A_{_U22₂}, a_{_x₂}, A_{_X₂}, U21₃, U22₃, x₂, a_{_U21₃}, a_{_U22₃}] > [tt, U11₃, U12₃, plus₂, a_{_U11₃}, a_{_U12₃}, a_{_plus₂}] > s₁
0 > s₁

Status:

tt: multiset
A_{_U21₂}: [2,1]
A_{_U22₂}: [2,1]
a_{_x₂}: [1,2]
A_{_X₂}: [1,2]
0: multiset
s₁: multiset
U11₃: [3,2,1]
U12₃: [3,2,1]
plus₂: [1,2]
U21₃: [3,2,1]
U22₃: [3,2,1]
x₂: [1,2]
a_{_U11₃}: [3,2,1]
a_{_U12₃}: [3,2,1]
a_{_plus₂}: [1,2]
a_{_U21₃}: [3,2,1]
a_{_U22₃}: [3,2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3)
a__plus(N, 0) → mark(N)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → a__U22(tt, M, N)
a__U22(tt, M, N) → a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(x(X1, X2)) → a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__x(N, s(M)) → a__U21(tt, M, N)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__x(N, 0) → 0
a__x(X1, X2) → x(X1, X2)
a__U11(tt, M, N) → a__U12(tt, M, N)
a__U12(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U11(tt, M, N)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U11(X1, X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
a__U12(X1, X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__U22(X1, X2, X3) → U22(X1, X2, X3)

(4) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, M, N) → A__U12(tt, M, N)
A__U12(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__U12(tt, M, N) → MARK(N)
A__U12(tt, M, N) → MARK(M)
A__PLUS(N, 0) → MARK(N)
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U11(tt, M, N)
MARK(x(X1, X2)) → A__X(mark(X1), mark(X2))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, M, N) → a__U12(tt, M, N)
a__U12(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__U21(tt, M, N) → a__U22(tt, M, N)
a__U22(tt, M, N) → a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
a__plus(N, 0) → mark(N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U11(tt, M, N)
a__x(N, 0) → 0
a__x(N, s(M)) → a__U21(tt, M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(x(X1, X2)) → a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
a__U12(X1, X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__U22(X1, X2, X3) → U22(X1, X2, X3)
a__x(X1, X2) → x(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 4 less nodes.

(6) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U12(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U11(tt, M, N)
A__U11(tt, M, N) → A__U12(tt, M, N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, M, N) → a__U12(tt, M, N)
a__U12(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__U21(tt, M, N) → a__U22(tt, M, N)
a__U22(tt, M, N) → a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
a__plus(N, 0) → mark(N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U11(tt, M, N)
a__x(N, 0) → 0
a__x(N, s(M)) → a__U21(tt, M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(x(X1, X2)) → a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
a__U12(X1, X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__U22(X1, X2, X3) → U22(X1, X2, X3)
a__x(X1, X2) → x(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

A__U12(tt, M, N) → A__PLUS(mark(N), mark(M))
A__PLUS(N, s(M)) → A__U11(tt, M, N)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
Used ordering: SCNP Order with the following components:
Level mapping:
Top level AFS:
A__U12(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__U12(x0)
A__PLUS(x0, x1, x2) = A__PLUS(x2)
A__U11(x0, x1, x2, x3) = A__U11(x0, x2)

Tags:
A__U12 has argument tags [2,1,1,3] and root tag 2
A__PLUS has argument tags [1,12,2] and root tag 1
A__U11 has argument tags [0,10,2,0] and root tag 2

Comparison: MAX
Underlying order for the size change arcs and the rules of R:
Combined order from the following AFS and order.
A__U12(x1, x2, x3) = x2
tt = tt
A__PLUS(x1, x2) = x1
mark(x1) = x1
s(x1) = s(x1)
A__U11(x1, x2, x3) = x2
U11(x1, x2, x3) = U11(x1, x2, x3)
a__U11(x1, x2, x3) = a__U11(x1, x2, x3)
U12(x1, x2, x3) = U12(x1, x2, x3)
a__U12(x1, x2, x3) = a__U12(x1, x2, x3)
a__plus(x1, x2) = a__plus(x1, x2)
0 = 0
plus(x1, x2) = plus(x1, x2)
U21(x1, x2, x3) = U21(x1, x2, x3)
a__U21(x1, x2, x3) = a__U21(x1, x2, x3)
a__U22(x1, x2, x3) = a__U22(x1, x2, x3)
a__x(x1, x2) = a__x(x1, x2)
U22(x1, x2, x3) = U22(x1, x2, x3)
x(x1, x2) = x(x1, x2)

Recursive path order with status [RPO].
Quasi-Precedence:

[U21₃, a_{_U21₃}, a_{_U22₃}, a_{_x₂}, U22₃, x₂] > [tt, U11₃, a_{_U11₃}, U12₃, a_{_U12₃}, a_{_plus₂}, plus₂] > s₁
[U21₃, a_{_U21₃}, a_{_U22₃}, a_{_x₂}, U22₃, x₂] > 0

Status:

tt: multiset
s₁: [1]
U11₃: [3,2,1]
a_{_U11₃}: [3,2,1]
U12₃: [3,2,1]
a_{_U12₃}: [3,2,1]
a_{_plus₂}: [1,2]
0: multiset
plus₂: [1,2]
U21₃: [2,3,1]
a_{_U21₃}: [2,3,1]
a_{_U22₃}: [2,3,1]
a_{_x₂}: [2,1]
U22₃: [2,3,1]
x₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented:

mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3)
a__plus(N, 0) → mark(N)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
a__U21(tt, M, N) → a__U22(tt, M, N)
a__U22(tt, M, N) → a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(x(X1, X2)) → a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2))
a__x(N, s(M)) → a__U21(tt, M, N)
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(tt, M, N) → a__U12(tt, M, N)
a__U12(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U11(tt, M, N)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U11(X1, X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
a__U12(X1, X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__U22(X1, X2, X3) → U22(X1, X2, X3)
a__x(N, 0) → 0
a__x(X1, X2) → x(X1, X2)

(8) Obligation:

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

A__U11(tt, M, N) → A__U12(tt, M, N)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

a__U11(tt, M, N) → a__U12(tt, M, N)
a__U12(tt, M, N) → s(a__plus(mark(N), mark(M)))
a__U21(tt, M, N) → a__U22(tt, M, N)
a__U22(tt, M, N) → a__plus(a__x(mark(N), mark(M)), mark(N))
a__plus(N, 0) → mark(N)
a__plus(N, s(M)) → a__U11(tt, M, N)
a__x(N, 0) → 0
a__x(N, s(M)) → a__U21(tt, M, N)
mark(U11(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U11(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U12(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U12(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(plus(X1, X2)) → a__plus(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(U21(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U21(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(U22(X1, X2, X3)) → a__U22(mark(X1), X2, X3)
mark(x(X1, X2)) → a__x(mark(X1), mark(X2))
mark(tt) → tt
mark(s(X)) → s(mark(X))
mark(0) → 0
a__U11(X1, X2, X3) → U11(X1, X2, X3)
a__U12(X1, X2, X3) → U12(X1, X2, X3)
a__plus(X1, X2) → plus(X1, X2)
a__U21(X1, X2, X3) → U21(X1, X2, X3)
a__U22(X1, X2, X3) → U22(X1, X2, X3)
a__x(X1, X2) → x(X1, X2)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

(9) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.

(0) Obligation:

(1) DependencyPairsProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(2) Obligation:

(3) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(4) Obligation:

(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(6) Obligation:

(7) QDPOrderProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(8) Obligation:

(9) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

(10) TRUE